A Novel REBOA Training Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a potentially life-saving intervention to treat noncompressible torso hemorrhage. Traditionally, REBOA use has been limited to surgeons. However, emergency physicians are often the first point-of-contact and are well-versed in obtaining rapid vascular access and damage control resuscitation, making them ideal candidates for REBOA training. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To fill this gap, we designed and evaluated a REBOA training curriculum for emergency medicine (EM) residents. METHODS: Participants enrolled in an accredited 4-year EM residency program (N = 11) completed a 12-hour REBOA training course. Day 1 included lectures, case studies, and hands-on training using REBOA task trainers and perfused cadavers. Day 2 included additional practice and competency evaluations. Assessments included a 25-item written knowledge exam, decision-making on case studies, REBOA placement success, and time-to-placement. Participants returned at 4 months to assess long-term retention. Data were analyzed using t-tests and nonparametric statistics at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Scores on a 25-item multiple choice test significantly increased from pre-training (65% ± 5%) to post-training (92% ± 1%), p < 0.001. On Day 2, participants scored 100% on correct recognition of REBOA indications and scored 100% on correct physical placement of REBOA. Exit surveys indicated increased preparedness, confidence, and support for incorporating this course into EM training. Most importantly, REBOA knowledge, correct recognition of REBOA indications, and correct REBOA placement skills were retained by the majority of participants at 4 months. CONCLUSION: This course effectively teaches EM residents the requisite skills for REBOA competence and proper placement. This study could be replicated at other facilities with larger, more diverse samples, aiming to expand the use of REBOA in emergency physicians and reducing preventable deaths in trauma.

Variation of anti-A and anti-B titers in group O potential blood donors: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation with fresh whole blood is vital to preserving life on the battlefield. Transfusing low titer O whole blood (LTOWB), defined as anti-A and anti-B titer levels of <1:256, is safe because LTOWB alleviates the risk for hemolytic transfusion reactions. Because of possible variations in titer levels over time, a study was needed using US Navy and Marine Corps personnel to assess how these titers change across two assessments. METHODS: Retrospective data from group O marines and sailors (M = 25 years of age; range, 19-35 years) stationed in the San Diego region were acquired from the Armed Services Blood Program and the Composite Health Care System. Of 972 group O donors between January 2016 and November 2019, 55 donors with 2 samples were identified (N = 55). Analysis included contrasting rates of high (≥1:256) and low (<1:256) anti-A and anti-B titers on the initial and second blood tests, along with the time between testings. RESULTS: The average time between testing was 332 days (range, 35-1,121 days), which far exceeded the recommended 90-day interval (p < 0.00001). Only 45% met the 90-day recommendation. Titer status changed frequently, from low to high (anti-A, 18%; anti-B, 13%; LTOWB to not LTOWB, 21%) or from high to low (anti-A, 62%; anti-B, 78%; not LTOWB to LTOWB, 62%). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-A and anti-B titers change frequently enough to warrant testing immediately before deployment and even during deployment. The observed time elapsed between testing is unacceptably long. The present pilot study provides a foundation for a larger formal study to more fully characterize titer changes over repeated testing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test, level IV.