Genomes of historical specimens reveal multiple invasions of LTR retrotransposons in Drosophila melanogaster during the 19th century.

Transposable element invasions have a profound impact on the evolution of genomes and phenotypes. It is thus an important open question how often such TE invasions occur. To address this question, we utilize the genomes of historical specimens, sampled about 200 y ago. We found that the LTR retrotransposons Blood, Opus, and 412 spread in Drosophila melanogaster in the 19th century. These invasions constitute second waves, as degraded fragments were found for all three TEs. The composition of Opus and 412, but not of Blood, shows a pronounced geographic heterogeneity, likely due to founder effects during the invasions. Finally, we identified species from the Drosophila simulans complex as the likely origin of the TEs. We show that in total, seven TE families invaded D. melanogaster during the last 200y, thereby increasing the genome size by up to 1.2Mbp. We suggest that this high rate of TE invasions was likely triggered by human activity. Based on the analysis of strains and specimens sampled at different times, we provide a detailed timeline of TE invasions, making D. melanogaster the first organism where the invasion history of TEs during the last two centuries could be inferred.

Experimentally evolving Drosophila erecta populations may fail to establish an effective piRNA-based host defense against invading P-elements.

To prevent the spread of transposable elements (TEs), hosts have developed sophisticated defense mechanisms. In mammals and invertebrates, a major defense mechanism operates through PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs). To investigate the establishment of the host defense, we introduced the P-element, one of the most widely studied eukaryotic transposons, into naive lines of Drosophila erecta We monitored the invasion in three replicates for more than 50 generations by sequencing the genomic DNA (using short and long reads), the small RNAs, and the transcriptome at regular intervals. A piRNA-based host defense was rapidly established in two replicates (R1, R4) but not in a third (R2), in which P-element copy numbers kept increasing for over 50 generations. We found that the ping-pong cycle could not be activated in R2, although the ping-pong cycle is fully functional against other TEs. Furthermore, R2 had both insertions in piRNA clusters and siRNAs, suggesting that neither of them is sufficient to trigger the host defense. Our work shows that control of an invading TE requires activation of the ping-pong cycle and that this activation is a stochastic event that may fail in some populations, leading to a proliferation of TEs that ultimately threaten the integrity of the host genome.

The composition of piRNA clusters in Drosophila melanogaster deviates from expectations under the trap model.

BACKGROUND: It is widely assumed that the invasion of a transposable element (TE) in mammals and invertebrates is stopped when a copy of the TE jumps into a piRNA cluster (i.e., the trap model). However, recent works, which for example showed that deletion of three major piRNA clusters has no effect on TE activity, cast doubt on the trap model. RESULTS: Here, we test the trap model from a population genetics perspective. Our simulations show that the composition of regions that act as transposon traps (i.e., potentially piRNA clusters) ought to deviate from regions that have no effect on TE activity. We investigated TEs in five Drosophila melanogaster strains using three complementary approaches to test whether the composition of piRNA clusters matches these expectations. We found that the abundance of TE families inside and outside of piRNA clusters is highly correlated, although this is not expected under the trap model. Furthermore, the distribution of the number of TE insertions in piRNA clusters is also much broader than expected. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the observed composition of piRNA clusters is not in agreement with expectations under the simple trap model. Dispersed piRNA producing TE insertions and temporal as well as spatial heterogeneity of piRNA clusters may account for these deviations.

Rapid evolutionary diversification of the flamenco locus across simulans clade Drosophila species.

Suppression of transposable elements (TEs) is paramount to maintain genomic integrity and organismal fitness. In D. melanogaster, the flamenco locus is a master suppressor of TEs, preventing the mobilization of certain endogenous retrovirus-like TEs from somatic ovarian support cells to the germline. It is transcribed by Pol II as a long (100s of kb), single-stranded, primary transcript, and metabolized into ~24-32 nt Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) that target active TEs via antisense complementarity. flamenco is thought to operate as a trap, owing to its high content of recent horizontally transferred TEs that are enriched in antisense orientation. Using newly-generated long read genome data, which is critical for accurate assembly of repetitive sequences, we find that flamenco has undergone radical transformations in sequence content and even copy number across simulans clade Drosophilid species. Drosophila simulans flamenco has duplicated and diverged, and neither copy exhibits synteny with D. melanogaster beyond the core promoter. Moreover, flamenco organization is highly variable across D. simulans individuals. Next, we find that D. simulans and D. mauritiana flamenco display signatures of a dual-stranded cluster, with ping-pong signals in the testis and/or embryo. This is accompanied by increased copy numbers of germline TEs, consistent with these regions operating as functional dual-stranded clusters. Overall, the physical and functional diversity of flamenco orthologs is testament to the extremely dynamic consequences of TE arms races on genome organization, not only amongst highly related species, but even amongst individuals.

Evolutionary dynamics of piRNA clusters in Drosophila.

Small RNAs produced from transposable element (TE)-rich sections of the genome, termed piRNA clusters, are a crucial component in the genomic defence against selfish DNA. In animals, it is thought the invasion of a TE is stopped when a copy of the TE inserts into a piRNA cluster, triggering the production of cognate small RNAs that silence the TE. Despite this importance for TE control, little is known about the evolutionary dynamics of piRNA clusters, mostly because these repeat-rich regions are difficult to assemble and compare. Here, we establish a framework for studying the evolution of piRNA clusters quantitatively. Previously introduced quality metrics and a newly developed software for multiple alignments of repeat annotations (Manna) allow us to estimate the level of polymorphism segregating in piRNA clusters and the divergence among homologous piRNA clusters. By studying 20 conserved piRNA clusters in multiple assemblies of four Drosophila species, we show that piRNA clusters are evolving rapidly. While 70%-80% of the clusters are conserved within species, the clusters share almost no similarity between species as closely related as D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Furthermore, abundant insertions and deletions are segregating within the Drosophila species. We show that the evolution of clusters is mainly driven by large insertions of recently active TEs and smaller deletions mostly in older TEs. The effect of these forces is so rapid that homologous clusters often do not contain insertions from the same TE families.

Novel quality metrics allow identifying and generating high-quality assemblies of piRNA clusters.

In most animals, it is thought that the proliferation of a transposable element (TE) is stopped when the TE jumps into a piRNA cluster. Despite this central importance, little is known about the composition and the evolutionary dynamics of piRNA clusters. This is largely because piRNA clusters are notoriously difficult to assemble as they are frequently composed of highly repetitive DNA. With long reads, we may finally be able to obtain reliable assemblies of piRNA clusters. Unfortunately, it is unclear how to generate and identify the best assemblies, as many assembly strategies exist and standard quality metrics are ignorant of TEs. To address these problems, we introduce several novel quality metrics that assess: (a) the fraction of completely assembled piRNA clusters, (b) the quality of the assembled clusters and (c) whether an assembly captures the overall TE landscape of an organisms (i.e. the abundance, the number of SNPs and internal deletions of all TE families). The requirements for computing these metrics vary, ranging from annotations of piRNA clusters to consensus sequences of TEs and genomic sequencing data. Using these novel metrics, we evaluate the effect of assembly algorithm, polishing, read length, coverage, residual polymorphisms and finally identify strategies that yield reliable assemblies of piRNA clusters. Based on an optimized approach, we provide assemblies for the two Drosophila melanogaster strains Canton-S and Pi2. About 80% of known piRNA clusters were assembled in both strains. Finally, we demonstrate the generality of our approach by extending our metrics to humans and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Tirant Stealthily Invaded Natural Drosophila melanogaster Populations during the Last Century.

It was long thought that solely three different transposable elements (TEs)-the I-element, the P-element, and hobo-invaded natural Drosophila melanogaster populations within the last century. By sequencing the "living fossils" of Drosophila research, that is, D. melanogaster strains sampled from natural populations at different time points, we show that a fourth TE, Tirant, invaded D. melanogaster populations during the past century. Tirant likely spread in D. melanogaster populations around 1938, followed by the I-element, hobo, and, lastly, the P-element. In addition to the recent insertions of the canonical Tirant, D. melanogaster strains harbor degraded Tirant sequences in the heterochromatin which are likely due to an ancient invasion, likely predating the split of D. melanogaster and D. simulans. These degraded insertions produce distinct piRNAs that were unable to prevent the novel Tirant invasion. In contrast to the I-element, P-element, and hobo, we did not find that Tirant induces any hybrid dysgenesis symptoms. This absence of apparent phenotypic effects may explain the late discovery of the Tirant invasion. Recent Tirant insertions were found in all investigated natural populations. Populations from Tasmania carry distinct Tirant sequences, likely due to a founder effect. By investigating the TE composition of natural populations and strains sampled at different time points, insertion site polymorphisms, piRNAs, and phenotypic effects, we provide a comprehensive study of a natural TE invasion.