Assessing the interrelationship between stigma, social influence, and cervical cancer prevention in an urban underserved setting: An exploratory study.

In the US, incidence and mortality from cervical cancer disproportionately affects racial/ethnic minorities and low-income women. Despite affordable access to primary and secondary prevention measures at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening rates are low, suggesting the presence of non-financial barriers to uptake in this population. This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study sought to explore factors that influence the acceptability of cervical cancer prevention services among parents and legal guardians of vaccine-eligible girls attending an urban FQHC and to assess social influences related to cervical cancer prevention. Participants included eight mothers, one father, and two grandparents/legal guardians. Nine participants self-identified as Black/Afro-Caribbean, or African American, two as Latinx, and one as Native American. The quantitative data suggested discordance between participants' cervical cancer prevention knowledge and their practices. Most indicated that their daughters had received the HPV vaccine but were unsure about HPV transmission modes. Qualitative data revealed that participants were comfortable disclosing information on HPV infection and vaccination status, and most women were likely to share information related to cervical cancer testing and diagnosis. Few comments indicated personal stigma on the part of participants, but there was frequent expression of perceived public stigma (shaming and blaming women), gender differences (men are indifferent to risk), and distrust of the healthcare system. Findings highlight several concepts including the disharmony between knowledge and practice, prevalent perceived public stigma, cumbersome attitudes on the part of men regarding HPV and cervical cancer, and distrust of the healthcare system.

Pathogens That Cause Acute Febrile Illness Among Children and Adolescents in Burkina Faso, Madagascar, and Sudan.

BACKGROUND: The etiology and optimal clinical management of acute febrile illness (AFI) is poorly understood. METHODS: Blood samples taken from study participants with acute fever (≥37.5°C) or a history of fever and recruited into the previous Typhoid Fever Surveillance in Africa (TSAP) study were evaluated using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based TaqMan-Array Card designed to detect a panel of bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens. Clinical metadata were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 615 blood samples available for analysis originated from Burkina Faso (n = 53), Madagascar (n = 364), and Sudan (n = 198) and were taken from participants ranging in age from 0-19 years. Through the TaqMan-Array Card, at least 1 pathogen was detected in 62% (33 of 53), 24% (86 of 364), and 60% (118 of 198) of specimens from Burkina Faso, Madagascar, and Sudan, respectively. The leading identified pathogen overall was Plasmodium spp., accounting for 47% (25 of 53), 2.2% (8 of 364), and 45% (90 of 198) of AFI at the respective sites. In Madagascar, dengue virus was the most prevalent pathogen (10.2%). Overall, 69% (357 of 516) of patients with clinical diagnoses of malaria, respiratory infection, or gastrointestinal infection were prescribed a World Health Organization guideline-recommended empiric antibiotic, whereas only 45% (106 of 237) of patients with pathogens detected were treated with an antibiotic exerting likely activity. CONCLUSIONS: A PCR approach for identifying multiple bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens in whole blood unveiled a diversity of previously undetected pathogens in AFI cases and carries implications for the appropriate management of this common syndrome.

Preoperative Pulmonary Function Test Results Are Not Associated With Postoperative Intubation in Children Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion for Scoliosis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative pulmonary function tests are routinely obtained in children with scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion despite unclear benefits as a perioperative risk assessment tool and frequent inability of patients to provide acceptable results. The goal of this study was to determine whether preoperative pulmonary function test results are associated with the need for postoperative intubation or intensive care unit admission after posterior spinal fusion. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion at a pediatric tertiary hospital between June 2012 and August 2017 were reviewed. Pulmonary function tests were consistently ordered for all patients, unless the patient was deemed unable to perform the test due to cognitive disability. Cases were categorized as primary or secondary scoliosis.Demographic data, preoperative bilevel positive airway pressure use, Cobb angle, intraoperative allogeneic blood transfusion, and ability to produce acceptable pulmonary function test results were collected for each patient. In patients with satisfactory pulmonary function test results, forced vital capacity and maximum inspiratory pressure were collected. Primary outcomes for analysis were postoperative intubation and intensive care unit admission. Univariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between each variable of interest and the primary outcomes. RESULTS: The study sample included 433 patients, 288 with primary scoliosis and 145 with secondary scoliosis. Among patients with primary scoliosis, 90% were able to produce acceptable pulmonary function test results, zero remained intubated postoperatively, and 6 were admitted to the intensive care unit. Among patients with secondary scoliosis, 44% could not attempt pulmonary function tests. Among those who did attempt the test, 30% were unable to produce meaningful results. Forced vital capacity and maximum inspiratory pressure were not found to be associated with postoperative intubation or intensive care unit admission. Weight, Cobb angle, intraoperative blood transfusion, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and preoperative bilevel positive airway pressure use were associated with patient outcomes. Among 357 total patients who attempted pulmonary function tests, 37 had high-risk results. Only 1 of these 37 patients remained intubated postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion, especially those with secondary scoliosis, are frequently unable to adequately perform pulmonary function tests. Among patients with interpretable pulmonary function tests, there was no association between results and postoperative intubation or intensive care unit admission. Routine pulmonary function testing for all patients with scoliosis may not be indicated for purposes of risk assessment before posterior spinal fusion. Clinicians should consider a targeted approach and limit pulmonary function tests to patients for whom results may guide preoperative optimization as this may improve outcomes and reduce inefficiencies and costs.