The human estrogen receptor-alpha is a ubiquitinated protein whose stability is affected differentially by agonists, antagonists, and selective estrogen receptor modulators.

The human estrogen receptor alpha-isoform (ERalpha) is a nuclear transcription factor that displays a complex pharmacology. In addition to classical agonists and antagonists, the transcriptional activity of ERalpha can be regulated by selective estrogen receptor modulators, a new class of drugs whose relative agonist/antagonist activity is determined by cell context. It has been demonstrated that the binding of different ligands to ERalpha results in the formation of unique ERalpha-ligand conformations. These conformations have been shown to influence ERalpha-cofactor binding and, therefore, have a profound impact on ERalpha pharmacology. In this study, we demonstrate that the nature of the bound ligand also influences the stability of ERalpha, revealing an additional mechanism by which the pharmacological activity of a compound is determined. Of note we found that although all ERalpha-ligand complexes can be ubiquitinated and degraded by the 26 S proteasome in vivo, the mechanisms by which they are targeted for proteolysis appear to be different. Specifically, for agonist-activated ERalpha, an inverse relationship between transcriptional activity and receptor stability was observed. This relationship does not extend to selective estrogen receptor modulators and pure antagonists. Instead, it appears that with these compounds, the determinant of receptor stability is the ligand-induced conformation of ERalpha. We conclude that the different conformational states adopted by ERalpha in the presence of different ligands influence transcriptional activity directly by regulating cofactor binding and indirectly by modulating receptor stability.

Comparative analyses of mechanistic differences among antiestrogens.

Antiestrogens such as tamoxifen are one of the most effective methods of treating estrogen receptor (ERalpha) positive breast cancers; however, the effectiveness of this therapy is limited by the almost universal development of resistance to the drug. If antiestrogens are recognized differently by the cell as it has been suggested, then in disease conditions where tamoxifen fails to function effectively, a mechanistically different antiestrogen might yield successful results. Although many antiestrogens have been developed, a direct comparison of their mechanisms of action is lacking, thus limiting their utility. Therefore, to determine if there are mechanistic differences among available antiestrogens, we have carried out a comprehensive analysis of the molecular mechanisms of action of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (40HT), idoxifene, raloxifene, GW7604, and ICI 182,780. Using a novel set of peptides that recognize different surfaces on ERalpha, we have found that following binding to ERalpha, each ligand induces a distinct ERalpha-ligand conformation. Furthermore, transcriptional assays indicate that each ERalpha-ligand complex is recognized distinctly by the transcription machinery, and consequently, antiestrogens vary in their ability to inhibit estradiol- and 40HT-mediated activities. Relative binding assays have shown that the affinity of these ligands for ERalpha is not always representative of their inhibitory activity. Using this assay, we have also shown that the pharmacology of each antiestrogen is influenced differently by hormone binding proteins. Furthermore, GW7604, like ICI 182,780, but unlike the other antiestrogens evaluated, decreases the stability of the receptor. Overall, our results indicate that there are clear mechanistic distinctions among each of the antiestrogens studied. However, GW7604 and ICI 182,780 differ more significantly from tamoxifen than idoxifene and raloxifene. These data, which reveal differences among antiestrogens, should assist in the selection of compounds for the clinical regulation of ERalpha function.