The versatility of progress testing assessed in an international context: a start for benchmarking global standardization?

Sharing and collaboration relating to progress testing already takes place on a national level and allows for quality control and comparisons of the participating institutions. This study explores the possibilities of international sharing of the progress test after correction for cultural bias and translation problems. Three progress tests were reviewed and administered to 3043 Pretoria and 3001 Maastricht medical students. In total, 16% of the items were potentially biased and removed from the test items administered to the Pretoria students (9% due to translation problems; 7% due to cultural differences). Of the three clusters (basic, clinical and social sciences) the social sciences contained most bias (32%), basic sciences least (11%). The differences that were found, comparing the student results of both schools, seem a reflection of the deliberate accentuations that both curricula pursue. The results suggest that the progress test methodology provides a versatile instrument that can be used to assess medical schools across the world. Sharing of test material is a viable strategy and test outcomes are interesting and can be used in international quality control.

Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: hold on to the philosophy.

INTRODUCTION: Problem-based learning (PBL) has gained a foothold within many schools in higher education as a response to the problems faced within traditional education. DISCUSSION: Working with PBL tutorial groups is assumed to have positive effects on student learning. Several studies provide empirical evidence that PBL stimulates cognitive effects and leads to restructuring of knowledge and enhanced intrinsic interest in the subject matter. However, staff members do not always experience the positive effects of group work which they had hoped for. When confronted with problems in group work, such as students who only maintain an appearance of being actively involved and students who let others do the work, teachers all too often implement solutions which can be characterized as teacher- directed rather than student-directed. Teachers tend to choose solutions which are familiar from their own experience during professional training, i.e. using the teacher-directed model. These solutions are not effective in improving group work and the negative experiences persist. CONCLUSION: It is argued that teachers should hold on to the underlying educational philosophy when solving problems arising from group work in PBL, by choosing actions which are consistent with the student-directed view of education in PBL.