Can the left ventricular early diastolic tissue-to-blood time interval be used to identify a normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure?

The pulsed Doppler early diastolic left ventricular (LV) tissue (e)-blood (E) onset temporal relationship (e-E) is suggested to predict pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), through the formulas: tau = 32 + 0.7(e-E) and PCWP = LV end-systolic pressure x e(-IVRT/tau). Small changes/errors in E could influence the quotient IVRT/tau by oppositely affecting IVRT and e-E. At rest in 50 healthy individuals we noted: e-E: 2 +/- 14 ms; IVRT: 89 +/- 17 ms; calculated tau: 33 +/- 10 ms; and PCWP: 9 +/- 9 mmHg (> 12 mmHg in 28%). Non-pharmacological preload alterations in 14 individuals rendered an intraindividual 'PCWP'-fluctuation of up to 40 mmHg. This application may therefore not be clinically robust.

The E/e filling index and right ventricular pressure in relation to applied international Doppler recommendations of left ventricular filling assessment.

AIM: A ratio>15 between the early diastolic pulsed Doppler velocities of the mitral inflow (E) and the basal left ventricular (LV) tissue (e) has been demonstrated to predict an elevated LV filling pressure (FP). An elevated LVFP implies an elevated right ventricular pressure (RVp). In order to investigate the sensitivity of the E/e filling index, we compared E/e and RVp, in their ability to identify a Doppler-assumed elevation of LVFP. METHODS AND RESULTS: Application of pulsed Doppler international recommendations grouped 134 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and 50 age- and sex-matched controls, according to LV filling: normal; delayed relaxation; an isolated pathological mitral-pulmonary venous-A-wave-duration difference; pseudo normal; or a restrictive filling pattern. An E/e>15 and an RVp>30 mmHg showed the following (%) sensitivity (32/94), specificity (95/76), positive (68/59), and negative (80/97) predictive values of a Doppler-assumed elevation of LVFP, in terms of either a pseudo normal or a restrictive filling pattern. CONCLUSION: The low sensitivity of E/e to detect a Doppler-assumed elevation of LVFP could limit its clinical usefulness as a single variable, in ACS. The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of RVp support its use as an additional LV filling variable in these patients.