Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 89(12): 5690-5696, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37132385

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of systemic therapy in elderly patients with Her2/neu-positive breast cancers has been questioned given the potential for cardiac side effects with several of the agents frequently used. This study aimed to evaluate trends in use of systemic therapy in patients 70 years and older. METHODS: The 2010-2016 SEER database was used to collect data on female patients with non-metastatic Her2/neu-positive breast cancer. Data was stratified to compare systemic therapy use in patients <70 vs ≥70. RESULTS: A total of 62,014 patients were included in the study. Of those, 79.0% (38,760) of patients <70 years old received systemic therapy while only 45.2% (5844) of patients ≥70 received systemic therapy (P < .001). Of patients ≥70 with ER positive tumors, 42.1% received systemic therapy and those with ER negative tumors, 52.1% received systemic therapy. The mortality rate in patients ≥70 was 8.5% in those who received systemic therapy and 12.1% in those who did not (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There remains a significant difference in rates of systemic therapy administration in the elderly population with an associated increase in mortality due to their cancer. Continuing educational efforts could be of benefit.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Idoso , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Receptor ErbB-2/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico
2.
Am J Surg ; 224(1 Pt A): 131-135, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35440377

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tertiary surveys can help identify missed injuries, but how and when to conduct them remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a policy requiring tertiary survey completion within 24 h post-admission. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed with a pre-intervention time-period of 8/1/2019-1/31/2020, where tertiary surveys were performed prior to discharge (n = 762). During the post-intervention time-period of 8/1/2020-1/31/21 tertiary surveys were performed within 24 h of admission (n = 651). RESULTS: Missed injury (1.6% [n = 12] vs. 1.5% [n = 10]; p = 0.953) and mortality rates (3.1% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.579) were similar between the pre- and post-intervention groups. Tertiary survey completion rates were higher (86.8% vs. 80.2%; p = 0.001) and exams performed earlier (1[1-1] vs. 1 [1-2] day, p < 0.001) in the post-intervention group. For those with missed injuries, time to injury identification and number of injuries identified on tertiary survey was unchanged. CONCLUSION: Requiring tertiary surveys within 24 h of admission can help identify and correct missed injuries, but standardization of the tertiary survey process and documentation may be as important as the timing.


Assuntos
Traumatismo Múltiplo , Centros de Traumatologia , Erros de Diagnóstico , Documentação , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...