Hospital-level variation in genetic testing in children's hospitals' neonatal intensive care units from 2016 to 2021.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine variation in genetic testing between neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across hospitals over time. METHODS: We performed a multicenter large-scale retrospective cohort study using NICU discharge data from the Pediatric Hospital Information System database between 2016 and 2021. We analyzed the variation in the percentage of NICU patients who had any genetic testing across hospitals and over time. We used a multivariable multilevel logistic regression model to investigate the potential association between patient characteristics and genetic testing. RESULTS: The final analysis included 207,228 neonates from 38 hospitals. Overall, 13% of patients had at least 1 genetic test sent, although this varied from 4% to 50% across hospitals. Over the study period, the proportion of patients tested increased, with the increase disproportionately borne by hospitals already testing high proportions of patients. On average, patients who received genetic testing had higher illness severity. Controlling for severity, however, only minimally reduced the degree of hospital-level variation in genetic testing. CONCLUSION: The percentage of NICU patients who undergo genetic testing varies among hospitals and increasingly so over time. Variation is largely unexplained by differences in severity between hospitals. The degree of variation suggests that clearer guidelines for NICU genetic testing are warranted.

Influence of Genetic Information on Neonatologists' Decisions: A Psychological Experiment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Genetic testing is expanding among ill neonates, yet the influence of genetic results on medical decision-making is not clear. With this study, we sought to determine how different types of genetic information with uncertain implications for prognosis influence clinicians' decisions to recommend intensive versus palliative care. METHODS: We conducted a national study of neonatologists using a split sample experimental design. The questionnaire contained 4 clinical vignettes. Participants were randomly assigned to see one of 2 versions that varied only regarding whether they included the following genetic findings: (1) a variant of uncertain significance; (2) a genetic diagnosis that affects neurodevelopment but not acute survival; (3) a genetic versus nongenetic etiology of equally severe pathology; (4) a pending genetic testing result. Physicians answered questions about recommendations they would make for the patient described in each vignette. RESULTS: Vignette versions that included a variant of uncertain significance, a diagnosis foreshadowing neurodevelopmental impairment, or a genetic etiology of disease were all associated with an increased likelihood of recommending palliative rather than intensive care. A pending genetic test result did not have a significant effect on care recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study of hypothetical cases suggest neonatologists apply uncertain genetic findings or those that herald neurodevelopmental disability in problematic ways. As genetic testing expands, understanding how it is used in decision-making and educating clinicians regarding appropriate use are paramount.

Hyperornithinemia, Hyperammonemia, and Homocitrullinuria Syndrome Causing Severe Neonatal Hyperammonemia.

Hyperornithinemia-hyperammonemia-homocitrullinuria (HHH) syndrome (OMIM 238970) is an autosomal recessive disorder that is caused by a deficiency of mitochondrial ornithine transporter 1, resulting in dysfunction of the urea cycle. HHH is the rarest of the urea cycle disorders, reported in fewer than 100 patients. It is characterized by extreme phenotypic variability, including diverse ages of onset and severity of phenotype. We report the first confirmed instance of HHH syndrome in a premature infant (31 2/7 weeks) with severe hyperammonemia (1,300 µmol/L).This case highlights the importance of considering HHH in the differential diagnosis for neonatal hyperammonemia. Because HHH is not detected by newborn screening, and the characteristic biochemical triad may be subtle or even absent, it has the potential to be underdiagnosed; however, making the diagnosis has critical therapeutic implications as treatment is distinct from other urea cycle defects. For instance, lysine supplementation is a beneficial treatment unique to HHH. Therefore, we present here a review of previously reported cases in order to demonstrate the full spectrum of the disease and highlight potentially diagnostic features.