Manual compared with target-controlled infusion of propofol.

We studied 160 ASA I-II patients, anaesthetized with propofol by infusion, using either a manually controlled or target-controlled infusion system. Patients were anaesthetized by eight consultant anaesthetists who had little or no previous experience of the use of propofol by infusion. In addition to propofol, patients received temazepam premedication, a single dose of fentanyl and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Each consultant anaesthetized 10 patients in sequential fashion with each system. Use of the target-controlled infusion resulted in more rapid induction of anaesthesia and allowed earlier insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. There was a tendency towards less movement in response to the initial surgical stimulus and significantly less movement during the remainder of surgery. Significantly more propofol was administered during both induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with the target-controlled system. This was associated with significantly increased end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements during the middle period of maintenance only, but recovery from anaesthesia was not significantly prolonged in the target-controlled group. With the exception of a clinically insignificant difference in heart rate, haemodynamic variables were similar in the two groups. Six of the eight anaesthetists found the target-controlled system easier to use, and seven would use the target-controlled system in preference to a manually controlled infusion. Anaesthetists without prior experience of propofol infusion anaesthesia quickly became familiar with both manual and target-controlled techniques, and expressed a clear preference for the target-controlled system.

The effect of epidural anaesthesia on peripheral resistance and graft flow following femorodistal reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which epidural anaesthesia influences peripheral resistance and graft blood flow following femorocrural reconstruction. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study measuring blood flow, arterial pressure and peripheral resistance in femorocrural bypass grafts for 20 min following onset of epidural anaesthesia with 15ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. PATIENTS: Twenty patients undergoing femorocrural reconstruction for critical lower-limb ischaemia with in situ long saphenous vein, under general anaesthesia. Ten patients had epidural cannulae inserted preoperatively and injected with bupivacaine after completion of the graft. RESULTS: Peripheral resistance fell in all 10 patients receiving epidural anaesthesia from a mean (range) of 1.07 PRU (0.32-2.2) to 0.49 PRU (0.19-0.72), compared to control values of 0.95 PRU (0.39-2.0) to 0.91 PRU (0.41-1.51; P < 0.01, Wilcoxon). There was a tendency for blood pressure to fall in the study patients (not significant) but graft blood flow still increased from 98 ml min-1 (41-221) to 160 ml min-1 (101-250), compared to flow in the control patients of 101 ml min-1 (45-176) at baseline to 104 ml min-1 (56-168; p < 0.01) at 20 min. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural anaesthesia significantly decreases peripheral resistance and increases graft blood flow in femorocrural grafts and would appear, therefore, to be of benefit for patients undergoing femorodistal reconstruction.

Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurement of continuous arterial pressure using the Finapres in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for lower segment caesarean section.

We have compared arterial pressures measured by an indwelling radial cannula with those obtained non-invasively by the Finapres 2000 (Ohmeda) during spinal anaesthesia for lower segment Caesarean section. The digital outputs of both pressures were recorded using a computerized system. We studied 20 patients, yielding a total of 18,772 data points after elimination of data recorded during arterial flushing and erroneous results from each source. The data analysis demonstrated a normal distribution for differences between the two methods of measurement, and the correlations between invasive and Finapres readings for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures were 0.78, 0.72 and 0.79, respectively, indicating an overall poor reflection of intra-arterial pressure by the Finapres under these circumstances. Some patients and some periods of readings reflected a high degree of precision and little bias. However, unexplained large differences in pressure and trends of change that were out of phase over time occurred frequently. We conclude that the Finapres cannot be recommended as a monitor of arterial pressure in this group of patients in whom sudden hypotension may be a threat to maternal or fetal outcome.

Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of infusions of phenylephrine and ephedrine.

Maternal cardiovascular changes and neonatal acid-base status were assessed in 29 healthy women undergoing elective lower segment Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. The patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups to receive an i.v. infusion of one of the following: ephedrine 1 mg min-1 (group E1: n = 10), ephedrine 2 mg min-1 (group E2: n = 9), or phenylephrine 10 micrograms min-1 (group P: n = 10). Invasive arterial pressure was monitored continuously and if hypotension occurred (defined as a 20% decrease from baseline, taken after i.v. preload administration), bolus doses of either ephedrine (6 mg in groups E1 and E2) or phenylephrine (20 micrograms in group P) were given. Only four patients became hypotensive in group E2, compared with eight patients in group E1 and nine patients in group P. The total time that the patients remained hypotensive was greatest in group P (P < 0.005), less in group E1 and least in group E2. Neonatal Apgar scores and acid-base profiles were similar in all three groups. In this study, an infusion of phenylephrine 10 micrograms min-1 with bolus doses of 20 micrograms was shown to be significantly less effective in maintaining systolic arterial pressure within 20% limits of baseline compared with an infusion of ephedrine 1 or 2 mg min-1 with bolus doses of 6 mg.