Insights into cancer surveillance in Central and Eastern Europe, Israel and Turkey.

The current cancer landscape within transitional economies in central and Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean area is not particularly optimistic. Current perceptions are often based on extrapolations from other countries and regions; and hence the authors collaborated with the South Eastern Europe Oncology Group (SEEROG) to collect information on cancer registration in Central and Eastern Europe, Israel and Turkey. Healthcare authorities and specialist oncology centres in 21 countries in the region were contacted for information on cancer registries in their countries. Based on this information, the authors believe that the recording and reporting of data on cancer in the region is at an acceptable level. The authors discuss and compare institution- and population-based registries, and present opinions on elements of an 'ideal registry' based on the survey replies and comparisons with other registries. A comparison with the sources used for GLOBOCAN 2008 illustrates the need for consistent data to be communicated, published and utilised throughout the region and the oncology community. The authors conclude by considering the potential value of collaboration between health authorities across the region, as well as between the clinical and epidemiological communities, to ensure that cancer data are consistently collected, verified and made public.

Angiogenic factors in relation to clinical effect in a phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Several anticancer agents including paclitaxel have an inhibitory effect on angiogenesis. AIMS: To compare the overall response rate and time to progression with changes in circulating angiogenic factors during palliative treatment with weekly paclitaxel. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic BC, ECOG 0-2, received weekly paclitaxel, concomitant with trastuzumab if HER2+ BC (n = 7). Circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were determined at base-line and before start of new course. RESULTS: Fifty-five of 63 included patients were evaluable. The overall response rate including stable disease ≥24 weeks (CR + PD + SD) was obtained in 25 of the evaluable patients (45%). The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.3 months and overall survival (OS) 16.7 months. Patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed a trend towards higher base-line VEGF compared with hormone receptor positive or HER2+ tumours and had shorter TTP. Significant differences in VEGF and bFGF levels at 12 weeks were found between patients with longer versus shorter TTP (VEGF: p = 0.046, bFGF: p = 0.005) and between patients gaining versus lacking clinical benefit (VEGF: p = 0.05, bFGF: p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility of circulating VEGF may be a useful tool for monitoring treatment efficacy.

Health-related quality of life during hormone therapy after breast cancer: a randomized trial.

AIM: To study the effects of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) on health-related quality of life in women after breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the Stockholm trial, breast cancer survivors were randomized to HT (estradiol and progestogen) or to a control group (no treatment). A subgroup of 75 women was studied (38 with HT, 37 controls). Fifty patients were on concomitant tamoxifen. Patients completed three questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C-30, EORTC QLQ-BR 23 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) during 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: A significant group-by-time interaction was found for improvement of insomnia in the HT group (p < 0.001). Within the HT group, but not in the control group, there was significant improvement for HADS anxiety, HADS depression, emotional, cognitive, and social functions and global quality of life. When HT was added to tamoxifen, the increase in global quality of life was significant (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The effects of HT on quality of life in breast cancer survivors have not previously been reported. The present data suggest that this controversial treatment may improve quality of life after breast cancer.

Hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer: attitudes of women eligible in a randomized trial.

Objectives To investigate the attitudes of breast cancer patients who accepted or declined participation in a randomized trial with hormone replacement therapy that might increase their risk of recurrence (the Stockholm trial). Methods A total of 115 patients free from breast cancer recurrence were interviewed; 57 were participants and 58 were non-participants in the Stockholm trial. Patients answered five questionnaires regarding information needs (two), attitudes to participation in trials (two) and patient role in treatment decisions (one). Results Participants in the Stockholm trial had a lower risk of breast cancer recurrence (measured by node-positive disease and tumor size) and were older than non-participants. Their information needs were the same. Participants in the trial were more prepared to accept uncertainty, to have an altruistic attitude, to accept risks including an increased risk of recurrence of breast cancer, if their quality of life or general health was improved. Most patients preferred a collaborative role in relation to their physician but participants often wanted more influence than they had in treatment decisions. Conclusion A patient's decision to accept or decline participation in the Stockholm trial was influenced by her objective risk of breast cancer recurrence and reflected her attitude to risk, uncertainty and preference to be active in treatment decisions.

Market and patient access to new oncology products in Europe: a current, multidisciplinary perspective.

To air challenging issues related to patient and market access to new anticancer agents, the Biotherapy Development Association--an international group focused on developing targeted cancer therapies using biological agents--convened a meeting on 29 November 2007 in Brussels, Belgium. The meeting provided a forum for representatives of pharmaceutical companies and academia to interact with European regulatory and postregulatory agencies. The goal was to increase all parties' understanding of their counterparts' roles in the development, licensure, and appraisal of new agents for cancer treatment, events guided by an understanding that cancer patients should have rapid and equitable access to life-prolonging treatments. Among the outcomes of the meeting were a greater understanding of the barriers facing drug developers in an evolving postregulatory world, clarity about what regulatory and postregulatory bodies expect to see in dossiers of new anticancer agents as they contemplate licensure and reimbursement, and several sets of recommendations to optimize patients' access to innovative, safe, effective, and fairly priced cancer treatments.

Effectiveness of third-generation chemotherapy on the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Norway: a national study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the introduction of modern third-generation chemotherapy was associated with survival benefits in a national population of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) and to explore geographical and temporary variations in the utilisation of chemotherapy. METHODS: All patients with ANSCLC in the Cancer Registry of Norway during 1994-2005 were included. Using sales of vinorelbine as an indicator for chemotherapy, annual county utilisation rates were calculated. Survival before and after the general introduction of vinorelbine and associations between survival and variations in utilisation in counties were investigated. In a subgroup, the predictors of having received chemotherapy were explored. RESULTS: Of 24 875 registered patients with lung cancer, 13 757 had ANSCLC. The annual utilisation of the indicator drug in Norway increased from 3.7 to 184.2 g (1998-2005). Median survival increased from 149 to176 days (p<0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for a diagnosis after the introduction was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.99). County utilisation rates of vinorelbine (increments of 100 mg/1000 inhabitants) were inversely associated with the risk of death (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98). County of residence predicted chemotherapy utilisation with odds ratios in the range 0.13 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.19) to 1.04 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.69), a county with traditionally high utilisation as reference. CONCLUSION: Utilisation of third-generation chemotherapy was associated with slightly increased survival of patients with ANSCLC. Geographical and temporal differences in utilisation indicate variable quality of delivered care.

Hormone therapy and estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) may increase breast cancer risk and influence tumor characteristics. We investigated 321 postmenopausal women aged 50-65 years, with breast cancer, diagnosed and treated at Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Hospital, during 1993-1997. In women using HT (n =90) estrogen receptor concentration (ER) at diagnosis were lower than in non-users (n =135) (1.17 vs 1.70 fmol/microg; p <0.05). HT users also had a tendency to less multifocal (5 vs 12%) (p <0.05) and metastatic disease (5% vs 2%) however this was not statistically significant. The estrogen receptor expression is always considered in the judgement on hormone dependency and the clinical decision on adjuvant endocrine therapy. A suppression of ER during HT could tentatively influence the treatment decisions in breast cancer patients and maybe disregard patients from endocrine treatment.

Long-term follow-up of the SBG 9401 study comparing tailored FEC-based therapy versus marrow-supported high-dose therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to investigate adjuvant marrow-supportive high-dose chemotherapy compared with an equitoxicity-tailored comparator arm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and twenty-five women below the age of 60 years with operated high-risk primary breast cancer were randomised to nine cycles of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supported and individually tailored FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide), (n = 251) or standard FEC followed by marrow-supported high-dose therapy with CTCb (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin) therapy (n = 274), followed by locoregional radiotherapy and tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: There were 104 breast cancer relapses in the tailored FEC group versus 139 in the CTCb group (double triangular method by Whitehead, P = 0.046), with a median follow-up of all included patients of 60.8 months. The event-free survival demonstrated 121 and 150 events in the tailored FEC- and CTCb group, respectively [P = 0.074, hazard ratio (HR) 0.804, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.633-1.022]. Ten patients in the tailored FEC regimen developed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)/myelodysplasia (MDS). One hundred deaths occurred in the tailored FEC group and 121 in the CTCb group (P = 0.287, HR 0.866, 95% CI 0.665-1.129). CONCLUSION: The update of this study shows an improved outcome linked to the tailored FEC treatment in relation to breast cancer relapse, but also an increased incidence of AML/MDS.

Tamoxifen and megestrol acetate for postmenopausal breast cancer: diverging effects on liver proteins, androgens, and glucocorticoids.

AIM: To compare the effects of tamoxifen and megestrol acetate on liver proteins, androgens, and glucocorticoids during adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer. METHODS: A subgroup of women within a large prospective multicenter trial were followed with blood sampling every 3 mo during 2 yr. Women were randomized to receive either continuous tamoxifen 40 mg/d or repeated sequential treatment with tamoxifen and megestrol acetate (MA) 160 mg/d. RESULTS: We found profound and distinct differences between the two regimens. Tamoxifen increased steroid-binding proteins (SHBG and CBG) and suppressed circulating androgens and IGF-I. In contrast, the metabolic effects of tamoxifen were clearly antagonized by MA. There was a rise in IGF-I and marked suppression of steroid-binding proteins. Levels of free testosterone were reduced by 70%. MA also caused apparent adrenal suppression. CONCLUSION: The different effects on anabolic/catabolic balance and adrenal function may relate to certain clinical effects during treatment.

Phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin with radiotherapy in patients with inextirpable non-rectal gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy is increasingly used in the primary management of patients with loco-regionally advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Oral chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) may represent a convenient way of delivering protracted infusion of fluorouracil. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of UFT plus LV combined with radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and a recommended dose for further testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inextirpable GI cancer received escalating doses of UFT (starting at 300 mg/m(2)/d with 50 mg/m(2)/d increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of LV (90 mg/d). UFT and LV were given 5 days per week concurrently with radiation to 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated, and 22 received the planned treatment. Three patients were withdrawn from treatment, two due to disease-progression and one due to toxicity. The MTD of UFT with radiation was 400 mg/m(2)/d with 90 mg/d of LV. Diarrhoea was the main dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Since some toxicity (3/12 DLTs) was seen in the expanded cohort at the level below, but none (0/9 DLT) at the starting level, the recommended dose chosen for further testing is 300-350 mg/m(2)/d depending upon the size of the target volume. CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiation with oral UFT plus LV is feasible and well tolerated and should be further investigated since tumour responses were frequently seen.

Radiation therapy in the management of brain metastases from breast cancer.

A retrospective analysis of 99 patients treated at Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Hospital 1979-1990 with palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases from breast cancer was performed. A relief of symptoms was obtained in 45% of patients. Median time from diagnosis of breast cancer until CNS metastases was 33 months. Median survival time with CNS metastases after diagnosis was 5 months. Prognostic indicators for survival were studied. Patients operated for a singular brain metastasis and irradiated postoperatively had a mean survival of 21 months while patients with multiple brain metastases and meningeal spread displayed a short median survival. Extracranial disease status influenced prognosis significantly. Radiation dose (CRE) did not correlate with survival.

Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomised trial. Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy drug distribution varies greatly among individual patients. Therefore, we developed an individualised fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen to improve outcomes in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. We then did a randomised trial to compare this individually tailored FEC regimen with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy followed by consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support. METHODS: 525 women younger than 60 years of age with high-risk primary breast cancer were randomised after surgery to receive nine cycles of tailored FEC to haematological equitoxicity with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support (n=251), or three cycles of FEC at standard doses followed by high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb), and peripheral-blood stem-cell or bone-marrow support (n=274). Both groups received locoregional radiation therapy and tamoxifen for 5 years. The primary outcome measure was relapse-free survival, and analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: At a median follow-up of 34.3 months, there were 81 breast-cancer relapses in the tailored FEC group versus 113 in the CTCb group (double triangular method p=0.04). 60 deaths occurred in the tailored FEC group and 82 in the CTCb group (log-rank p=0.12). Patients in the CTCb group experienced more grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity compared with the tailored FEC group (p<0.0001). Two treatment-related deaths (0.7%) occurred in the CTCb group. Six patients in the tailored FEC group developed acute myeloid leukaemia and three developed myelodysplastic syndrome. INTERPRETATION: Tailored FEC with G-CSF support resulted in a significantly improved relapse-free survival and fewer grade 3 and 4 toxicities compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy with CTCb as adjuvant therapy of women with high-risk primary breast cancer.

Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients.

Patient participation in treatment decisions presupposes well-informed patients. The purpose of this study was to determine Swedish breast cancer patients' information needs and their preferences for participation in treatment decisions. Patients (n = 201) were interviewed on nine categories of information and five patient roles, using paired comparisons. Patients gave priority to facts about disease and treatment (chances of cure, stage of disease, treatment options). A collaborative role in treatment decisions was preferred by 87% of the patients. Most patients (56%) preferred a passive form of collaboration: I prefer that my doctor makes the final decision about my treatment but seriously considers my opinion. Younger and better educated patients tended to prefer a more active role. Many patients wanted to be more active (20%) and some more passive (8%) than they actually were. Patients gave priority to disease-specific information, but this reflected needs other than taking control of treatment decisions.

High activity and tolerability demonstrated for exemestane in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who had previously failed on tamoxifen treatment.

This phase II, multicentre, open-label, clinical trial evaluated antitumoral efficacy, tolerability and endocrine effects following 25 mg of treatment with oral exemestane given daily to postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Eligibility criteria included oestrogen and/or progesterone positivity or a prior response to hormonal therapy if receptor status was unknown; prior failure to tamoxifen therapy; and progressive disease. Patients were divided into three strata: patients who did not respond to tamoxifen or progressed after disease stabilisation (SD) for less than 6 months (stratum 1); patients who, after an initial response or SD lasting at least 6 months, experienced disease progression whilst on tamoxifen (stratum 2); patients with recurrent metastatic disease during or within 12 months of discontinuing adjuvant tamoxifen (stratum 3). Of the 137 patients who received exemestane, 4 experienced a complete response (CR) and 28 a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 23%. Another 33 patients had SD for > or = 24 weeks, resulting in an overall success rate of 47%. The median time to objective response was 16.1 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.9-24.1). The median response duration was 69.4 weeks, the median duration of overall success 59.1 weeks, the median time to progression (TTP) 25.1 weeks and the median time to treatment failure (TTF) 24 weeks. Response to previous hormonal therapy had little effect on the results, except that there was a trend toward a higher overall success rate in patients who did not respond to previous hormonal therapy. After 8 weeks of therapy, serum levels of oestradiol (E2), oestrone (E1) and oestrone sulphate (E1S) were suppressed to 15.2%, 9.7% and 10.7% of baseline, respectively. The most common adverse events of drug-related or indeterminate cause were hot flushes (14%), dizziness (9%), nausea (8%) and increased sweating (5%). Exemestane had a favourable effect on performance status and tumour-related signs and symptoms, both of which improved or stabilised in approximately 67% and 68% of patients respectively. Exemestane is a unique therapy that is highly active and well tolerated as a new treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Correlation of vascular endothelial growth factor content with recurrences, survival, and first relapse site in primary node-positive breast carcinoma after adjuvant treatment.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in primary node-positive breast cancer (NPBC) after adjuvant endocrine treatment or adjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VEGF was quantitatively measured in tumor cytosols from 362 consecutive patients with primary NPBC using an enzyme immunoassay for human VEGF(165). Adjuvant treatment was given to all patients, either as endocrine therapy (n = 250) or chemotherapy (n = 112). The median follow-up time was 56 months. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed VEGF to be a significant predictor of RFS (P =.0289) and OS (P =.0004) in the total patient population and in patients who received adjuvant endocrine treatment (RFS, P =.0238; OS, P =.0121). In the group of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, no significant difference was seen in RFS, but a difference was seen in OS (P =.0235). Patients with bone recurrences tended to have lower VEGF expression (median, 2.17 pg/microg DNA) than patients with visceral metastasis (4.41 pg/microg), brain metastasis (8.29 pg/microg), or soft tissue recurrences (3.16 pg/microg). Multivariate analysis showed nodal status (P =.0004), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P <.0001), and tumor size (P =.0085) to be independent predictors of RFS. VEGF was found to be an independent predictor of OS (P =.0170; relative risk [RR] = 1.82), as were ER (P <.0001; RR = 5.19) and nodal status (P =.0002; RR = 2.58). For patients receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment, multivariate analysis showed VEGF content to be an independent predictor of OS (P =.0420; RR = 1.90) but not of RFS. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that VEGF(165) content in tumor cytosols is a predictor of RFS and OS in primary NPBC. VEGF content might also predict outcome after adjuvant endocrine treatment, but further studies in a prospective setting with homologous treatments are required.

Radiation recall--another call with tamoxifen.

Tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal antioestrogen, has been used as an adjuvant therapy in patients with oestrogen-receptor positive breast cancer for more than 10 years. Few cutaneous adverse side-effects of the skin are found with this therapy. In this study we present 20 cases of adverse skin effects in relation to tamoxifen during 1979-1997 reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reaction Register and 1160 skin side-effects reported to he World Health Organisation's International Collaborative Programme on Drug Monitoring. One new case report of radiation recall in conjunction to tamoxifen, with no sign of reactivation despite 18 months treatment with the tamoxifen analogue toremifene is also discussed in detail. This case illustrates that toremifene can be used as a second-line therapy in patients who have received radiation recall, on tamoxifen.

Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma in Sweden. A health economic comparison of palliative treatment with best supportive care versus palliative treatment with gemcitabine in combination with best supportive care.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with pancreatic cancer have only short survival after diagnosis, irrespective of treatment. The aim of this study was to perform a health economic evaluation of present standard treatment (in most cases, palliative treatment in combination with best supportive care) versus palliative treatment with gemcitabine in combination with best supportive care in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. DESIGN: The use of resources and associated costs according to present treatment practice were estimated and calculated retrospectively. Costs were calculated from diagnosis until death. Actual costs and treatment effects for the patient population were compared with expected treatment costs for the same population if they additionally received gemcitabine. SETTING: This economic analysis is based on a hypothetical comparison and was performed from a societal point of view. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The study population consisted of all patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer during the year April 1994 to March 1995 and resident in Stockholm County, Sweden. After exclusions, 184 patients were included in the economic analysis. INTERVENTIONS: The effects of gemcitabine treatment on survival and disease-related symptoms were extrapolated from the results of a recent randomised clinical trial in North America. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: The estimated additional costs for chemotherapy, treatment of adverse effects and in- and outpatient care associated with gemcitabine treatment were approximately 132,000 Swedish kronor (SEK) per life-year gained. This result is comparable with costs per life-year gained for other accepted treatments, for example those of home dialysis and kidney transplants for chronic renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer may be a cost-effective alternative, but the results need to be confirmed in future randomised trials.

Proliferating fraction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of primary breast cancer in relation to objective local response and relapse-free survival.

In women with inoperable primary breast cancer or large T2 tumors, preoperative chemotherapy may induce tumor shrinkage, facilitate surgery and possibly improve survival. However, at present there are no reliable tumor cell parameters to predict which patients will benefit from preoperative chemotherapy. The aims of this study were to analyze the utility of tumor cell proliferation as assessed by Ki-67 staining in fine-needle aspirates from primary breast carcinomas to predict initial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as recurrence-free survival. The study comprised 51 women with primary breast cancer who received 3-4 courses of CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor cells were procured through fine-needle aspiration biopsy prior to treatment. A second biopsy was performed before the second course of therapy in 33 women. Twenty-nine women (56%) experienced an objective local response after neoadjuvant treatment. During a median follow-up period of 39 months, 21 women (41%) developed disease recurrence. A decrease of more than 25% in proliferating fraction after the first course of chemotherapy correlated significantly with a decreased risk of disease recurrence (p = 0.033) but showed no significant correlation with local objective response. A multivariate analysis revealed that the decrease in proliferating fraction significantly (p < 0.05) added prognostic information to that of involved lymph nodes. These results suggest that changes in proliferating fraction as assessed by Ki-67 staining in fine-needle aspirates during preoperative chemotherapy may be of value in selecting postoperative adjuvant systemic treatment.

FEC mobilized stem cells for high-dose therapy in breast cancer patients. SB6 9401 Study Group.

The feasibility of mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) using anthracycline containing polychemotherapy and G-CSF on the first 50 patients randomized to the high-dose arm in the adjuvant SBG 9401 is investigated. The patients were treated with standard FEC (5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) for two courses followed by a modified third FEC course with a C dose of 1200 mg/m2 supported with subcutaneous G-CSF (filgrastim) at 5 mg/kg followed by harvest around day 11. The mean yield of CD34+ cells per patient was 10.6x10(6)/kg (range 2.6-29.1). The side effects after the third course were low and only one patient developed an uncomplicated granulopenic fever. Our data indicated a correlation between number of transfused CD34+ cells and days to neutrophil and platelet recovery. In conclusion, the modified FEC regimen followed by G-CSF is a feasible method for PBSC mobilization in the adjuvant setting.