Resolving the unconventional mechanisms underlying RXFP1 and RXFP2 receptor function.

The receptors for relaxin and insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) are now well-characterized as the relaxin family peptide (RXFP) receptors RXFP1 and RXFP2, respectively. They are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with closest similarity to the glycoprotein hormone receptors, with both containing large ectodomains with 10 leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). Additionally, RXFP1 and RXFP2 are unique in the LGR family in that they contain a low-density lipoprotein class A (LDL-A) module at their N-terminus. Ligand-mediated activation of RXFP1 and RXFP2 is a complex process involving various domains of the receptors. Primary ligand binding occurs via interactions between B-chain residues of the peptides with specific residues in the LRRs of the ectodomain. There is a secondary binding site in the transmembrane exoloops which may interact with the A chain of the peptides. Receptor signaling through cAMP then requires the unique LDL-A module, as receptors without this domain bind ligand normally but do not signal. This is an unconventional mode of activation for a GPCR, and the precise mode of action of the LDL-A module is currently unknown. The specific understanding of the mechanisms underlying ligand-mediated activation of RXFP1 and RXFP2 is crucial in terms of targeting these receptors for future drug development.

The evolution of the relaxin peptide family and their receptors.

The relaxin peptide family in humans consists of relaxin-1, 2 and 3 and the insulin-like peptides (INSL)-3, 4, 5 and 6. The evolution of this family has been controversial; points of contention include the existence of an invertebrate relaxin and the absence of a ruminant relaxin. Over the past four years we have performed a comprehensive analysis of the relaxin peptide family using all available vertebrate and invertebrate genomes. Contrary to previous reports an invertebrate relaxin was not found; sequence similarity searches indicate the family emerged during early vertebrate evolution. Phylogenetic analyses revealed the presence ofpotential relaxin-3, relaxin and INSL5 homologs in fish; dating their emergence far earlier than previously believed. There are four known relaxin peptide family receptors; the relaxin and INSL3 receptors, the leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptors (LGR), LGR7 and LGR8 respectively; and the two relaxin-3 receptors, GPCR135 and GPCR142. Database searching identified several invertebrate ancestors of LGR7 and LGR8; the absence of an invertebrate relaxin suggests the presence of an unidentified invertebrate ligand for these receptors. No invertebrate ancestors of GPCR135 or GPCR142 were found. Based on the theory that interacting proteins co-evolve together, phylogenetic analyses of the relaxin peptide family receptors were performed to provide insight into interactions within the relaxin system. Co-evolution between INSL5 and GPCR142, as evidenced by the loss of both genes in the rat and dog and their similar expression profiles, predicted GPCR142 to be the endogeneous INSL5 receptor. This interaction has since been confirmed experimentally. The emergence and presence of multiple GPCR135 homologs in fish reflected similar findings for relaxin-3. It seems likely the ancestral relaxin system was relaxin-3 acting through GPCR135, before LGR7 was "acquired" as a relaxin receptor early in vertebrate development.

Defining the LGR8 residues involved in binding insulin-like peptide 3.

The peptide hormone insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) is essential for testicular descent and has been implicated in the control of adult fertility in both sexes. The human INSL3 receptor leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 8 (LGR8) binds INSL3 and relaxin with high affinity, whereas the relaxin receptor LGR7 only binds relaxin. LGR7 and LGR8 bind their ligands within the 10 leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) that comprise the majority of their ectodomains. To define the primary INSL3 binding site in LGR8, its LRRs were first modeled on the crystal structure of the Nogo receptor (NgR) and the most likely binding surface identified. Multiple sequence alignment of this surface revealed the presence of seven of the nine residues implicated in relaxin binding to LGR7. Replacement of these residues with alanine caused reduced [(125)I]INSL3 binding, and a specific peptide/receptor interaction point was revealed using competition binding assays with mutant INSL3 peptides. This point was used to crudely dock the solution structure of INSL3 onto the LRR model of LGR8, allowing the prediction of the INSL3 Trp-B27 binding site. This prediction was then validated using mutant INSL3 peptide competition binding assays on LGR8 mutants. Our results indicated that LGR8 Asp-227 was crucial for binding INSL3 Arg-B16, whereas LGR8 Phe-131 and Gln-133 were involved in INSL3 Trp-B27 binding. From these two defined interactions, we predicted the complete INSL3/LGR8 primary binding site, including interactions between INSL3 His-B12 and LGR8 Trp-177, INSL3 Val-B19 and LGR8 Ile-179, and INSL3 Arg-B20 with LGR8 Asp-181 and Glu-229.

Evolution of the relaxin-like peptide family: from neuropeptide to reproduction.

The relaxin-like peptide family consists of relaxin-1, relaxin-2, and relaxin-3 and the insulin-like peptides (INSL)-3, INSL4, INSL5, and INSL6 (human relaxin-2 is equivalent to relaxin-1 in other species). Evolution of this family has been contentious. We therefore sought to clarify the issue by performing phylogenetic analysis of all relaxin-like peptides from the genomic databases available. Surprisingly, the phylogeny, combined with previous biologic characterizations, suggest that although relaxin's original function was likely in the brain, its reproductive role was acquired just prior to the divergence of amphibians. This phylogeny also illuminates inconsistencies in relaxin evolution in invertebrates, chickens, and cows.

Coevolution of the relaxin-like peptides and their receptors.

Currently, four relaxin peptide family receptors are known: LGR7 is the relaxin receptor, although it also interacts specifically with relaxin-3; LGR8 is the insulin-like factor 3 (INSL3) receptor; and GPCR135 or the somatostatin- and angiotensin-like peptide receptor (SALPR) and GPCR142 are both specific relaxin-3 receptors. Because these receptors coevolved together with their relaxin ligands, phylogenetic analysis of these sequences can provide insight into peptide-receptor interactions and even predict interacting partners for INSL4, INSL5, and INSL6, the receptors for which are unknown.

Evolution of the relaxin-like peptide family.

BACKGROUND: The relaxin-like peptide family belongs in the insulin superfamily and consists of 7 peptides of high structural but low sequence similarity; relaxin-1, 2 and 3, and the insulin-like (INSL) peptides, INSL3, INSL4, INSL5 and INSL6. The functions of relaxin-3, INSL4, INSL5, INSL6 remain uncharacterised. The evolution of this family has been contentious; high sequence variability is seen between closely related species, while distantly related species show high similarity; an invertebrate relaxin sequence has been reported, while a relaxin gene has not been found in the avian and ruminant lineages. RESULTS: Sequence similarity searches of genomic and EST data identified homologs of relaxin-like peptides in mammals, and non-mammalian vertebrates such as fish. Phylogenetic analysis was used to resolve the evolution of the family. Searches were unable to identify an invertebrate relaxin-like peptide. The published relaxin cDNA sequence in the tunicate, Ciona intestinalis was not present in the completed C. intestinalis genome. The newly discovered relaxin-3 is likely to be the ancestral relaxin. Multiple relaxin-3-like sequences are present in fugu fish (Takifugu rubripes) and zebrafish (Danio rerio), but these appear to be specific to the fish lineage. Possible relaxin-1 and INSL5 homologs were also identified in fish and frog species, placing their emergence prior to mammalia, earlier than previously believed. Furthermore, estimates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates (dN/dS) suggest that the emergence of relaxin-1, INSL4 and INSL6 during mammalia was driven by positive Darwinian selection, hence these peptides are likely to have novel and in the case of relaxin-1, which is still under positive selection in humans and the great apes, possibly still evolving functions. In contrast, relaxin-3 is constrained by strong purifying selection, demonstrating it must have a highly conserved function, supporting its hypothesized important neuropeptide role. CONCLUSIONS: We present a phylogeny describing the evolutionary history of the relaxin-like peptide family and show that positive selection has driven the evolution of the most recent members of the family.