Accuracy of preoperative clinical examination and imaging for mandibular resection in oral cancer: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

The aim of this systematic review is not only to analyse the accuracy of clinical examination and radiological preoperative assessment of mandibular invasion reported in isolation, but to highlight those reports that have combined them. A total of 1636 titles and abstracts published between 1995 - 2000 were screened following a literature search in PubMed. Keywords were "mandible" and "squamous cell carcinoma". A total of 90 full manuscripts were reviewed with 24 meeting defined inclusion/exclusion criteria and yielding the data reported. The most sensitive test was single photon emission tomography with eight out of the 10 studies reporting sensitivity higher than 95%. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated superior sensitivity but was less specific than computed tomography (CT). A single report attempted to report the combined CT and MRI scans with a separate expert reporting but did not result in more reliable detection. Periosteal stripping was not reported, and there was insufficient data to establish the value of new technologies. This review confirms that, to our knowledge, there are no reliable data on the results of combining imaging techniques with or without clinical examination. It emphasises the lack of data for the combination of preoperative techniques to enhance safe oncological resection of the mandible. Based on the evidence gathered in this review an algorithm of assessment of possible mandibular invasion is proposed. With new technologies available and 3-dimensional models to help plan the mandibular resection and reconstruction, the potential of combining preoperative investigations should be fully realised through prospective research.

Patients' experience and perceived concerns regarding obtaining and taking prescriptions for head and neck osteoradionecrosis.

The main components of the medical management of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are combinations of clodronate, pentoxifylline, tocopherol, sometimes with antibiotics or chlorhexidine rinses. Anecdotally in the Cheshire and Merseyside network, patients report having difficulties getting and taking their prescription, hence the aim was to survey patient experience of obtaining prescriptions, administration of the medications, and side effects. Patients prescribed tocopherol and pentoxifylline from the pharmacy department's record database from the period of January 2019 to June 2020 were invited to take part in a semi-structured telephone survey. Sixteen patients out of a total 33 (48%) responded. 11 patients (69%) reported some issue collecting their repeat prescriptions, commonly low stock of medicines in community or unwillingness of GPs to prescribe. One patient permanently stopped treatment owing to difficulties obtaining medication, whilst for three there were temporary gaps in treatment. Difficulty in administration of the medications was reported in 7 patients (44%) patients, most commonly in those with pre-existing dysphagia. Issues related to difficulties in swallowing the large pentoxifylline tablet or with the vitamin E capsules. Patients crushed the medications, but this was associated with gastrointestinal side-effects in one patient who had to stop treatment. One patient stopped chlorhexidine mouthwash due to oral soreness. In conclusion, medical management of ORN is well tolerated by patients. There is difficulty for patients getting prescriptions in primary care. Few patients need to stop taking the medication due to difficulty in administration or side-effects. More patient information would be useful for all concerned.