A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

BACKGROUND: Circumcision is a common procedure, but regional and societal attitudes differ on whether there is a need for a male to be circumcised and, if so, at what age. This is an important issue for many parents, but also pediatricians, other doctors, policy makers, public health authorities, medical bodies, and males themselves. DISCUSSION: We show here that infancy is an optimal time for clinical circumcision because an infant's low mobility facilitates the use of local anesthesia, sutures are not required, healing is quick, cosmetic outcome is usually excellent, costs are minimal, and complications are uncommon. The benefits of infant circumcision include prevention of urinary tract infections (a cause of renal scarring), reduction in risk of inflammatory foreskin conditions such as balanoposthitis, foreskin injuries, phimosis and paraphimosis. When the boy later becomes sexually active he has substantial protection against risk of HIV and other viral sexually transmitted infections such as genital herpes and oncogenic human papillomavirus, as well as penile cancer. The risk of cervical cancer in his female partner(s) is also reduced. Circumcision in adolescence or adulthood may evoke a fear of pain, penile damage or reduced sexual pleasure, even though unfounded. Time off work or school will be needed, cost is much greater, as are risks of complications, healing is slower, and stitches or tissue glue must be used. SUMMARY: Infant circumcision is safe, simple, convenient and cost-effective. The available evidence strongly supports infancy as the optimal time for circumcision.

Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records of three consecutive cohorts of women. All cohorts received a digoxin feticide injection on Day 1. Two cohorts were treated with laminaria, cohort A of 151 women over 1-2 days and cohort B of 52 women over 1-3 days, and cohort C of 151 women was treated with Dilapan-S over 1-3 days. RESULTS: Adequate cervical priming for dilatation and evacuation (D&E) on Day 2 was achieved in 98% of the Dilapan-S cohort and 56% of cohort A and 40% of the cohort B laminaria cohorts. Return to theater for D&E 3-4 hours after dilator insertion on Day 2 occurred in 62.3% of Dilapan-S cohort C and 9.3% of cohort A and 4% of cohort B laminaria cohorts (P = 0.001). A mean D&E theater time of 19 minutes for laminaria cohort A was reduced by 10.1% in the Dilapan-S cohort C (P = 0.02). The incidence of unscheduled overnight delivery outside the clinic was 0% for Dilapan-S and 1.3% for cohort A and 3.8% for cohort B laminaria cohorts (P = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Dilapan-S osmotic dilators are superior to laminaria in producing more cervical priming and dilatation in a shorter time. This enables 17-22 week D&E procedures to be carried out in fewer days and in shorter theater times. They also eliminate the risk of an unscheduled overnight delivery outside the clinic.

Pulsatile intravenous insulin therapy: the best practice to reverse diabetes complications?

In the basal state and after oral ingestion of carbohydrate, the normal pancreas secretes insulin into the portal vein in a pulsatile manner. The end organ of the portal vein is the liver, where approximately 80% of pancreatic insulin is extracted during first pass. In Type 1 diabetes, pancreatic insulin secretion is nearly or completely absent whilst in Type 2 diabetes the normal pattern is absent, abnormal, or blunted. Exogenous subcutaneous insulin treatment results in plasma insulin concentrations that are not pulsatile and a fraction of normal portal vein levels. Oral hypoglycemic agents also do not result in normal pulsatile response to a glucose load. Due to hypoglycemia risk, intensive treatment is not recommended after serious complications develop. Consequently, no conventional therapy has proved effective in treating advanced diabetes complications. Beta-cell replacement using whole pancreas or islet transplantation has been utilized to treat certain problems in Type 1 diabetic patients, but still unavailable for all diabetics. Pulsatile intravenous insulin therapy (PIVIT) is an insulin therapy, which mimics the periodicity and amplitude of normal pancreatic function. Numerous studies show PIVIT effective in preventing, reversing, and reducing the severity and progression of diabetes complications, however, the mechanisms involved with the improvement are not clearly understood. Here, we review the cellular basis of normal and abnormal insulin secretion, current treatments available to treat diabetes, the physiologic basis of PIVIT and possible mechanisms of action.