The use of a standard-length conical tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty to address Paprosky type I-II femoral defects: a prospective study of 87 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Low-grade femoral defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) might be preferably treated with a primary implant. Almost no previous study reported the use of standard-length conical tapered (SLCT) stems in these cases. We analyzed a series of cases using a SLCT stem in rTHA with Paprosky type I-II femoral defects. The purpose of the study was to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes in this series of rTHA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively followed 87 patients undergoing a femoral component rTHA: 53 Paprosky type I and 34 type II femoral defects. Patient-reported measures (Oxford Hip Score, EQ-5D, VAS pain during rest and activity) were administered at baseline, 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Radiographic subsidence overtime was scored. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the subsidence over time, the complication-free survival, and the implant survivorship with reoperation and stem revision as endpoints. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 72.5 (SD ± 23.9) months. All PROMs significatively improved over time. The average subsidence was 2.8 (SD ± 3.2), 3.6 (SD ± 4.4), and 4.0 (SD ± 4.9) mm at 4, 12, and 24 months respectively. 6 stems had subsidence > 10 mm. The survival without complication was 0.85 (95% CI 0.94-0.77), while the implant survival without reoperation was 0.83 (95% CI 0.95-0.72). The overall stem survival rate was 93.7% (95% CI 0.91-0.97) at 2 years. CONCLUSION: The use of a SLCT stem in rTHA with Paprosky type I-II femoral defects demonstrated good survival with low subsidence rates during the first 2 years after surgery. Surgeons should consider the use of this primary prosthesis as a potential treatment during stem revision in cases with limited femoral bone loss.

Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Loosening and migration are common modes of aseptic failure following complex revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Metaphyseal cones allow surgeons to negotiate the loss of femoral and tibial bone stock while obtaining stable bony fixation. This study examines the mid-term functional and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing rTKA utilizing a novel metaphyseal cone system with stems of variable length and fixation methods. METHODS: This two-center retrospective study examined all patients who underwent rTKA with a novel porous, titanium tibial or femoral cone in combination with a stem of variable length and fixation who had a minimum follow-up of 2-years. Outcome analysis was separated into tibial and femoral cones as well as the stem fixation method (hybrid vs. fully cemented). RESULTS: Overall, 123 patients who received 156 cone implants were included (74 [60.2%] tibial only, 16 [13.0%] femoral only, and 33 [26.8%] simultaneous tibial and femoral) with a mean follow-up of 2.76 ± 0.66 years. At 2-years of follow-up the total cohort demonstrated 94.3% freedom from all-cause re-revisions, 97.6% freedom from aseptic re-revisions, and 99.4% of radiographic cone osteointegration. All-cause revision rates did not differ between stem fixation techniques in both the tibial and femoral cone groups. CONCLUSION: The use of a novel porous titanium femoral and tibial metaphyseal cones combined with stems in patients with moderate to severe bone defects undergoing complex revision total knee arthroplasty confers excellent results independent of stem fixation technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and re-revision rates are not associated with the indication for revision total hip arthroplasty : a prospective evaluation of 647 consecutive patients.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between reason for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and outcomes in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: We reviewed a prospective cohort of 647 patients undergoing full or partial rTHA at a single high-volume centre with a minimum of two years' follow-up. The reasons for revision were classified as: infection; aseptic loosening; dislocation; structural failure; and painful THA for other reasons. PROMs (modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EuroQol five-dimension three-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) score, and visual analogue scales for pain during rest and activity), complication rates, and failure rates were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The indication for revision influenced PROMs improvement over time. This finding mainly reflected preoperative differences between the groups, but diminished between the first and second postoperative years. Preoperatively, patients revised due to infection and aseptic loosening had a lower mOHS than patients with other indications for revision. Pain scores at baseline were highest in patients being revised for dislocation. Infection and aseptic loosening groups showed marked changes over time in both mOHS and EQ-5D-3L. Overall complications and re-revision rates were 35.4% and 9.7% respectively, with no differences between the groups (p = 0.351 and p = 0.470, respectively). CONCLUSION: Good outcomes were generally obtained regardless of the reason for revision, with patients having the poorest preoperative scores exhibiting the greatest improvement in PROMs. Furthermore, overall complication and reoperation rates were in line with previous reports and did not differ between different indications for rTHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):859-866.

Stay Short or Go Long in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paprosky Type II Femoral Defects: A Comparative Study With the Use of an Uncemented Distal Fixating Modular Stem and a Primary Monobloc Conical Stem With 5-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: In the revisions for Paprosky type II femoral defects, diaphyseal fixating femoral stems are commonly used. To preserve bone stock, the use of a shorter primary conical stem could be an adequate alternative. The objective of this study is to compare the results of a primary conical stem to the more commonly used diaphyseal fixating modular revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty surgery with Paprosky type II femoral defects. METHODS: A total of 59 consecutive patients with Paprosky type II femoral defects from our prospective revision registry were included. Thirty patients who received a long distal fixating modular stem (Revision Stem, Lima Corporate) and 29 patients who received a primary conical short stem (Wagner Cone, Zimmer) were prospectively followed. Minimal follow-up time was 2 years for subsidence and patient-reported outcome measures and 5 years for complications, reoperation, and revision. We compared subsidence, perioperative complications, reoperations, femoral component survival, Oxford Hip Score, EuroQol 5 Dimension, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, and VAS for pain during activity between stems. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding demographic, clinical, and surgery-related characteristics. We found more perioperative complications and stem revisions with the modular revision stem than with the primary conical stem. There were no statistical differences in subsidence, EuroQol 5 Dimension, Oxford Hip Score, and VAS for pain at rest or during activity between both stems. CONCLUSION: In revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type II femoral defects, uncemented primary monobloc conical femoral stems showed the same clinical result as distal fixating modular stems with fewer complications and fewer stem revisions.

Suprapectoral versus subpectoral tenodesis for Long Head Biceps Brachii tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Suprapectoral long head biceps (LHB) tenodesis and subpectoral LHB tenodesis are both commonly performed surgical procedures. Due to the more proximal position of the suprapectoral tenodesis site this technique may be accompanied with more postoperative pain in the bicipital groove and cramping pain in the biceps muscle. We hypothesized that subpectoral tenodesis is associated with a better clinical outcome than suprapectoral tenodesis. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase from January 2000 to July 2019 with the terms "biceps" and "tenodesis". Only comparing studies reporting on American Shoulder Elbow Score (ASES), VAS for anterior shoulder pain, Constant Murley Score (CMS), pain in the bicipital groove and Popeye deformity following suprapectoral and subpectoral tenodesis were included. Quality assessment of included articles was performed using the Coleman score. RESULTS: Seven comparative studies with 409 patients reporting the results of LHB suprapectoral and subpectoral tenodesis were included. A significant, but clinically irrelevant difference in ASES (mean difference 2.15) p=0.01 was observed. No significant difference in CMS (mean difference 0.09), VAS for anterior shoulder pain (mean difference 0.01), Popeye deformity (odds ratio 3.19) and persistent bicipital pain (odds ratio 2.66). The Coleman score ranged between 53 and 87. CONCLUSION: Based on this meta-analysis we found a significantly, though not clinically relevant difference in ASES in favour of subpectoral LHB tenodesis when compared with suprapectoral LHB tenodesis. Comparable results were found with regard to outcome scores, pain in the bicipital groove and avoiding a Popeye deformity.

There is no difference in postoperative pain, function and complications in patients with chondrocalcinosis in the outcome of total knee arthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: Chondrocalcinosis is the radiographic appearance of calcium crystals in cartilage and other soft tissue. It is suggested that preoperative chondrocalcinosis predicts a worse outcome after total knee arthroplasty and it is unclear if chondrocalcinosis leads to more postoperative complications. This study aimed to compare function, pain, postoperative complications, postoperative signs of acute arthritis and revision rates between patients with and without chondrocalcinosis undergoing total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study performed in 2017, 408 knees in 392 patients (16 bilateral total knee arthroplasties) were included. None of the patients received additional synovectomy. PROMs were evaluated after 1 year (n = 294) and 5 years (n = 308). The follow-up for clinical data was 5 years (n = 408). The range of final follow-up was 57-84 months. All preoperative radiographs were scored for chondrocalcinosis and Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score and Algofunctional Index were used to assess outcome. All clinical records were screened for postoperative complications (excessive wound discharge, infection, loosening, PAO, stiffness), arthritis after surgery and reoperation or revision for any reason. RESULTS: Sixty-three knees (15.4%) showed signs of chondrocalcinosis. Male gender, higher age and lower BMI were risk factors for chondrocalcinosis. No difference was found in Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score and Algofunctional Index, nor in postoperative complications, postoperative signs of acute arthritis and revision rate. CONCLUSION: Patients with and without chondrocalcinosis have the same outcome after total knee arthroplasty related to pain, functionality, complications, arthritis and revision after surgery for end-stage osteoarthritis. Chondrocalcinosis is not a contraindication for total knee arthroplasty and additional synovectomy is unnecessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure.

PURPOSE: Literature describes the concern of an overstuffed shoulder joint after a resurfacing humeral head implant (RHHI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-observer variability of (1) the critical shoulder angle (CSA), (2) the length of the gleno-humeral offset (LGHO), and (3) the anatomic center of rotation (COR) in a patient population operated with a Global Conservative Anatomic Prosthesis (CAP) RHHI. The measurements were compared between the revision and non-revision groups to find predictive indicators for failure. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative radiographs were retrieved from 48 patients who underwent RHHI from 2007 to 2009 using a Global CAP hemiarthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis. This cohort consisted of 36 females (12 men) with a mean age of 77 years (SD 7.5). Two musculoskeletal radiologist and two specialized shoulder orthopedic surgeons measured the CSA, LGHO, and COR of all patients. RESULTS: The inter-observer reliability showed excellent reliability for the CSA, LGHO, and the COR, varying between 0.91 and 0.98. The mean COR of the non-revision group was 4.9 mm (SD 2.5) compared to mean COR of the revision group, 8 mm (SD 2.2) (p < 0.01). The COR is the predictor of failure (OR 1.90 (95%Cl 1.19-3.02)) with a cut of point of 5.8 mm. The mean CSA was 29.8° (SD 3.9) There was no significant difference between the revision and non-revision groups (p = 0.34). The mean LGHO was 2.6 mm (SD 3.3) post-surgery. The mean LGHO of the revision group was 3.9 (SD 1.7) (p = 0.04) post-surgery. Despite the difference in mean LGHO, this is not a predictor for failure. CONCLUSION: The CSA, LGHO, and COR can be used on radiographs and have a high inter-observer agreement. In contrast with the CSA and LGHO, we found a correlation between clinical failure and revision surgery in case of a deviation of the COR greater than 5 mm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institutional review board, number: ACLU 2016.0054, Ethical Committee number: CBP M1330348. Registered 7 November 2006.

[Metal implants and airport security checks]. / Metalen implantaten en veiligheidscontroles op luchthavens.

Orthopaedic surgeons and trauma surgeons in the Netherlands are implanting 65,000 joint replacements and treating nearly 300,000 fractures per year. For many travellers with a metal implant - but also for the physicians who are treating them - it is unclear what the consequences will be when they have to go through airport security checks. These checks follow a fixed procedure in accordance with European rules which involves travellers passing through a number of visible and invisible barriers. The first barrier is usually a metal detector or a millimetre wave scanner; when the implant has been detected, this is followed by a body search. The electromagnetic field of a metal detector penetrates into the body; the metal detector has therefore a higher detection rate for metal implants than a millimetre wave scanner, of which radio waves reach up to or just below the skin. Medical documentation can help reassure the traveller or the security officer, but possible additional checks cannot be avoided.

Results and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) after One-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: A Single-centre Retrospective Study.

Background: Little is known about functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip. Methods: a cohort of 30 subjects treated with one-stage revision between 2011 and 2015 was identified, and questionnaires on functional outcome and QoL were distributed. Results: 28 subjects were successfully treated (93%). Most subjects were referred from other hospitals. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was found in 50% of the cases, and 40% of all cultured bacteria were multidrug-resistant. 25% had subsequent revision surgery, unrelated to PJI. Functional outcome was good and QoL scores were high, comparable to prosthetic joint revision surgery in general. Conclusion: Although the cohort was small and statistical analysis was not performed, this study showed that excellent results can be obtained with one-stage revision for hip PJI. Functional outcome and QoL was comparable to prosthetic joint revision surgery in general.

Cryocompression therapy after elective arthroplasty of the hip.

Pneumatic compression and cryotherapy have been successfully being employed in the management of acute tissue damage. The Game Ready System (GRS) combines cyclic compression and cryotherapy. No randomised controlled trial has been performed on the effects of combined cyclic compression and cryotherapy in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We observed postoperative pain, morphine usage, blood loss, wound discharge, patient and medical staff satisfaction, together with the feasibility of a cryocompression machine, total hospital admission time, infection rate, deep vein thrombosis, and short-term prosthesis related problems in this context. Thirty patients, mean age 68 yrs (range 31-83 yrs) undergoing elective hip arthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis were included. Control patients (n = 15) received a tricot compression bandage alone, and patients studied received a tricot compression bandage plus intermittent cryocompression therapy 15 times for 30 minutes. Haemoglobin levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 dropped 2.34 mmol/L in the control group and 1,87 mmol/L in the intervention group (p = 0,027). At POD 3 haemoglobin levels were reduced by 2,63 and 2,16 respectively (p = 0,646). A trend occurred towards lower morphine usage, shorter hospital admission time and less wound discharge in the study group. No difference was found in postoperative pain scores. One event of deep venous thrombosis occurred in the control group. Intermittent cryocompression therefore appears to reduce postoperative blood loss. A trend towards less analgesic use, shorter hospital stay, less wound discharge and less pain at 6 weeks postoperatively was also observed.

Less invasive indicators of changes in thermodilution cardiac output by ventilatory changes after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We studied whether changes in less invasive, noncalibrated pulse-contour cardiac output (by modified ModelFlow, COmf) and derived stroke volume variations (SVV), as well as systolic and pulse pressure variations, predict changes in bolus thermodilution cardiac output (COtd), evoked by continuous and cyclic increases in intrathoracic pressure by increases in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tidal volume (Vt), respectively. METHODS: Prospective study on 17 critically ill postcardiac surgery patients on full mechanical ventilatory support, in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: In contrast to systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation, SVV increased from (mean +/- SD) 6.2 +/- 4.4 to 8.1 +/- 5.6 at PEEP 10 cmH2O (P = 0.064) and to 7.8 +/- 3.5% at PEEP 15 cmH2O (P = 0.031), concomitantly with a 12 +/- 7 and 11 +/- 8% decrease in COmf and COtd (P < 0.001), respectively. For pooled data, changes in COmf correlated with those in COtd (r = 0.55, P = 0.002), but changes in SVV did not. Variables did not change when Vt was increased up to 50%. CONCLUSION: A fall in COmf is more sensitive than a rise in SVV, which is more sensitive than systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation, in tracking a fall in COtd during continuous (and not cyclic) increases in intrathoracic pressure, in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. This suggests a reduction in biventricular preload as the main factor in decreasing cardiac output and increasing SVV with PEEP.