Ethanol co-administration moderates 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine effects on human physiology.

Alcohol is frequently used in combination with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Both drugs affect cardiovascular function, hydration and temperature regulation, but may have partly opposing effects. The present study aims to assess the acute physiologic effects of (co-) administration of MDMA and ethanol over time. A four-way, double blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled study in 16 healthy volunteers (9 male and 7 female) between the ages of 18 and 29. MDMA (100 mg) was given orally and blood ethanol concentration was maintained at pseudo-steady state levels of 0.6 per thousand by a three-hour 10% intravenous ethanol clamp. Cardiovascular function, temperature and hydration measures were recorded throughout the study days. Ethanol did not significantly affect physiologic function, with the exception of a short lasting increase in heart rate. MDMA potently increased heart rate and blood pressure and induced fluid retention as well as an increase in temperature. Co-administration of ethanol with MDMA did not affect cardiovascular function compared to the MDMA alone condition, but attenuated the effects of MDMA on fluid retention and showed a trend for attenuation of MDMA-induced temperature increase. In conclusion, co-administration of ethanol and MDMA did not exacerbate physiologic effects compared to all other drug conditions, and moderated some effects of MDMA alone.

Forearm vasoconstrictor response in uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: According to the 'haemodynamic hypothesis', increased tissue perfusion predisposes to microangiopathy in diabetic patients. We hypothesized that the typical haemodynamic changes underlying the increased tissue perfusion can be explained by a decreased sympathetic nerve activity caused by chronic hyperglycaemia. In this study we investigated sympathetic activity in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 15 DM patients (DM duration 6.3 +/- 3.8 year; HbA1c 7.9 +/- 1.3%) and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (Control), sympathetic nervous system activity was measured at rest (baseline) and during sympathoneural stimulation (lower body negative pressure (LBNP)) by means of interstitial and plasma noradrenaline (NA) sampling and power spectral analysis. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was measured before (baseline) and during a cold pressure test. Forearm blood flow was measured during forearm vascular alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor blockade. RESULTS: At baseline, forearm vascular resistance (FVR), plasma NA concentrations, MSNA and heart rate variability were similar in both groups. LBNP-induced vasoconstriction was significantly attenuated in the DM group compared with the Control group (DeltaFVR: 12 +/- 4 vs. 19 +/- 3 arbitrary units, P < 0.05). The responses of plasma NA and heart rate variability did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline FVR and sympathetic nerve activity are normal in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes. However, the forearm vasoconstrictor response to sympathetic stimulation is attenuated, which cannot be attributed to an impaired sympathetic responsiveness.

Evaluation of specific high-performance liquid-chromatographic determinations of urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine by comparison with isotope dilution mass spectrometry.

A method for the determination of metanephrine (MN; also known as metadrenaline), normetanephrine (NMN; also known as normetadrenaline) and 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) in human urine using high-performance liquid chromatography followed by electrochemical detection (ECD) was validated primarily by comparing the results with those obtained by a gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) reference method. Correlation coefficients of 0.93, 0.94 and 0.91 were obtained for MN, NMN and 3-MT, respectively, in a group of healthy controls consisting of 30 women and 30 men. A systematic difference was detected only for 3-MT (-16%). Further tests of accuracy (linearity and recovery) and precision demonstrated that the described method must be considered to be a reliable approach to assess urinary metanephrines in the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma. At lower concentrations (MN, 248 nmol/L; NMN, 434 nmol/L; 3-MT, 402 nmol/L), within-assay coefficients of variation were close to 5% or less (5.3, 4.6 and 2.2%, respectively) and between-assay coefficients of variation were 8.9, 11.2 and 12.3%, respectively, for the same low levels. This raises the possibility that this method can also be applied to assess urinary free, unconjugated metanephrines. Sex differences were detected for MN and NMN excretion when expressed in nmol per 24h and nmol/mmol creatinine, respectively, by both ECD and GC-MS methods.

Evaluation of specific high-performance liquid-chromatographic determinations of urinary adrenaline and noradrenaline by comparison with isotope dilution mass spectrometry.

A method for the determination of metadrenaline (MA), normetadrenaline (NMA) and 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) in human urine using high-performance liquid chromatography followed by electrochemical detection (ECD) was validated primarily by comparing the results with those obtained by a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) reference method. Correlation coefficients of 0.93, 0.94 and 0.91 were obtained for MA, NMA and 3-MT, respectively, in a group of healthy controls consisting of 30 women and 30 men. A systematic difference was detected only for 3-MT (-16%). Further tests of accuracy (linearity and recovery) and precision demonstrated that the described method must be considered to be a reliable approach to assess urinary metadrenalines in the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma. At lower concentrations (MA, 248 nmol/L; NMA, 434 nmol/L; 3-MT, 402 nmol/L), within-assay coefficients of variation were close to 5% or less (5.3, 4.6 and 2.2%, respectively) and between-assay coefficients of variation were 8.9, 11.2 and 12.3%, respectively, for the same low levels. This raises the possibility that this method can also be applied to assess urinary free, unconjugated metanephrines. Sex differences were detected for MA and NMA excretion when expressed in nmol per 24 h and nmol/mmol creatinine, respectively, by both ECD and GC-MS methods.

Sympathoadrenal activation and the dumping syndrome after gastric surgery.

Dumping symptoms suggest concomitant sympathoadrenal activation. To evaluate the relation between dumping symptoms and postprandial plasma catecholamine changes, standardized dumping-provocation tests with use of oral glucose were performed for 16 gastric surgery patients with dumping, for 14 gastric surgery patients without dumping, and for 14 healthy control patients. Early dumping symptoms were present for all patients with dumping, and late symptoms developed in three patients with dumping after glucose ingestion. Patients without dumping and healthy control patients had slight complaints or no complaints. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure remained unaffected for the three groups. Positive breath-hydrogen tests, heart rate increments, and reactive plasma glucose decrements were present for patients with dumping and for patients without dumping, but not for control patients. Plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline increased for patients with dumping and for patients without dumping, but not for control patients. The noradrenaline increment was higher for patients with dumping (98%) than for patients without dumping (78%; p <0.05). The noradrenaline increment was related to the dumping score and to the heart rate increment for the first hour after glucose ingestion, whereas the adrenaline increment was related to the plasma glucose decrement for the third hour. Therefore, dumping symptoms clearly are accompanied by postprandial sympathoadrenal activation, but sympathoadrenal activation cannot account completely for development of dumping symptoms.

Cardiovascular and endocrine responses to experimental stress: effects of mental effort and controllability.

The objective of the study was to investigate the unique and interactive effects of the controllability of a task and mental effort required by that task on cardiovascular and endocrine reactivity, when both were manipulated independently. A 2 x 2 factorial design was used, with two levels of mental effort and two levels of control. Twenty-four healthy male subjects participated in each experimental condition. Heart rate, blood pressure, catecholamine and cortisol responses were determined. High effort lead to greater increases in heart rate, blood pressure and norepinephrine levels. Uncontrollability lead to higher cortisol, blood pressure and norepinephrine responses. In addition, there was an effort x control interaction effect on the diastolic blood pressure response. In conclusion, effort has clear sympathetic effects, whereas control influences both the sympathetic nervous system and the release of cortisol. Having control seems to be most beneficial in high effort situations, at least with respect to sympathetic reactivity.

Insulin stimulates epinephrine release under euglycemic conditions in humans.

In healthy subjects, acute physiological hyperinsulinemia induces activation of the sympathetic nervous system, but in the absence of hypoglycemia, plasma epinephrine levels have not been found to increase during insulin administration. However, the venous level of epinephrine reflects the net result of release, clearance, and uptake and therefore is not a good measure of adrenomedullary epinephrine secretion. The influence of 90 minutes of euglycemic physiological hyperinsulinemia (60 mU x m(-2) x min(-1); plasma insulin concentration, approximately 700 pmol x L[-1]) on epinephrine kinetics using the 3H-epinephrine tracer method was studied in 12 healthy normotensive, non-obese subjects. After bolus injection, [3H]-epinephrine was continuously infused with arterial and venous blood sampling at regular intervals, enabling calculation of total body (systemic) and forearm epinephrine release and clearance. Studies were performed in the basal state and during sympathetic stimulation by lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) of -15 mm Hg for 15 minutes. Control experiments ("sham" clamps, but with LBNP) were performed in four of the 12 individuals. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (all arterial glucose samples > or = 4.2 mmol x L[-1]) induced an increase of the arterial epinephrine concentration (P = .03), and tended to increase total body epinephrine release (P = .08). Total body epinephrine clearance did not change during hyperinsulinemia. The insulin-induced increase in forearm blood flow ([FBF] by plethysmography, from 3.0 +/- 0.4 to 3.8 +/- 0.6 mL x dL(-1) x min(-1), P = .01) was strongly correlated with the increase in arterial epinephrine (r = .78, P < .01). Plasma epinephrine concentrations did not change during control experiments (sham clamp). Sympathetic stimulation alone as induced by LBNP did not stimulate epinephrine release. However, the combination of insulin and LBNP significantly increased epinephrine release (from 0.37 +/- 0.06 to 0.56 +/- 0.12 nmol x m(-2) x min(-1), P = .03). We conclude that acute physiological hyperinsulinemia under euglycemic conditions induces epinephrine release. This effect is enhanced when hyperinsulinemia is combined with sympathetic stimulation by LBNP. Due to increased forearm removal, venous epinephrine concentrations hardly change. Epinephrine release was strongly correlated with the hemodynamic effects of insulin.

Long-term beta 1-adrenergic blockade restores adrenomedullary activity in primary hypertension.

In this study we examined the effects of long-term treatment of 19 patients with primary hypertension with the beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist atenolol on norepinephrine and epinephrine kinetics, at rest and during sympathoadrenal stimulation by lower body negative pressure. Norepinephrine and epinephrine kinetics were measured by using the radioisotope-dilution technique by steady-state infusion of tritiated norepinephrine and epinephrine. The patients were studied before and at the end of 3 months of treatment with atenolol (50 or 100 mg daily). A control group of four normotensive subjects was studied before and after 3 months without any drug treatment. In this group, only arterial blood samples were collected without infusion of the tritiated catecholamines. Atenolol decreased blood pressure and heart rate, but forearm vascular resistance was not affected by atenolol. During atenolol, baseline arterial plasma epinephrine decreased from 0.23 +/- 0.02 to 0.17 +/- 0.01 nM (p < 0.05), and this was accompanied by a decrease in total body epinephrine spillover from 0.50 +/- 0.05 to 0.35 +/- 0.04 nmol/min (p < 0.05). In the control group, arterial plasma epinephrine had not decreased after 3 months. In addition, the increment of arterial plasma epinephrine during lower body negative pressure at -40 mm Hg was attenuated during atenolol. Atenolol had no effect on total body and forearm norepinephrine spillover rates, either at rest or during lower body negative pressure. Clearance rates of epinephrine and norepinephrine were not significantly affected by atenolol. These results suggest that treatment of patients with primary hypertension with the beta 1-adrenoceptor blocker atenolol inhibits the adrenomedullary secretion of epinephrine, but it does not affect the biochemical indices of sympathoneural activity. It remains speculative whether this selective effect of atenolol on epinephrine secretion contributes to its hypotensive action and to its cardioprotective effects in the long term.

Adrenomedullary secretion of epinephrine is increased in mild essential hypertension.

To assess whether patients with mild essential hypertension have excessive activities of the sympathoneuronal and adrenomedullary systems, we examined total body and forearm spillovers and norepinephrine and epinephrine clearances in 47 subjects with mild essential hypertension (25 men, 22 women, aged 38.1 +/- 6.7 years) and 43 normotensive subjects (19 men, 24 women, aged 36.5 +/- 5.9 years). The isotope dilution method with infusions of tritiated norepinephrine and epinephrine was used at rest and during sympathetic stimulation by lower body negative pressure at -15 and -40 mm Hg. Hypertensive subjects had a higher arterial plasma epinephrine concentration (0.20 +/- 0.01 nmol.L-1: mean +/- SE) than normotensive subjects (0.15 +/- 0.01) (P < .01). The increased arterial plasma epinephrine levels appeared to be due to a higher total body epinephrine spillover rate in the hypertensive subjects (0.23 +/- 0.02 nmol.min-1.m-2) than the normotensive subjects (0.18 +/- 0.01) (P < .05) and not to a decreased plasma clearance of epinephrine. The arterial plasma norepinephrine level, total body and forearm norepinephrine spillover rates, and plasma norepinephrine clearance were not altered in the hypertensive subjects. The responses of the catecholamine kinetic variables to lower body negative pressure were not consistently different between normotensive and hypertensive individuals. These data indicate that individuals with mild essential hypertension (1) have elevated arterial plasma epinephrine concentrations that are due to an increased total body epinephrine spillover rate, indicating an increased adrenomedullary secretion of epinephrine; (2) have no increased generalized sympathoneuronal activity and no increased forearm norepinephrine spillover; and (3) have similar responses of both the sympathoneuronal and adrenomedullary systems to sympathetic stimulation by lower body negative pressure.

Differential effects of low- and high-intensity lower body negative pressure on noradrenaline and adrenaline kinetics in humans.

1. Lower body negative pressure provides a means to examine neurocirculatory reflexive responses to decreases in venous return to the heart. We assessed whether the pattern of catecholaminergic responses to lower body negative pressure depends on the intensity of the stimulus (-15 versus -40 mmHg). 2. In 14 healthy subjects, responses of forearm blood flow and noradrenaline spillover and of total body noradrenaline and adrenaline spillover were assessed during infusion of [3H]noradrenaline and [3H]adrenaline during -15 and -40 mmHg of lower body negative pressure. 3. During lower body negative pressure at -15 mmHg, heart rate and pulse pressure did not change, but forearm vascular resistance increased by 25-50%. Forearm noradrenaline spillover increased by about 50%, from 0.63 +/- 0.16 to 0.94 +/- 0.23 pmol min-1 100 ml-1 (P < 0.05). Total body noradrenaline spillover did not change, and total body adrenaline spillover increased significantly by about 30%. Clearances of noradrenaline and adrenaline were unchanged. 4. During lower body negative pressure at -40 mmHg, heart rate increased and pulse pressure decreased. Forearm vascular resistance increased by about 100%, and forearm noradrenaline spillover increased by 80%, from 0.73 +/- 0.19 to 1.32 +/- 0.36 pmol min-1 100 ml-1 (P < 0.05). Total body noradrenaline spillover increased by 30%, and total body adrenaline spillover increased by about 50%. Clearances of both noradrenaline and adrenaline decreased. 5. The results are consistent with the view that selective deactivation of cardiopulmonary baroreceptors during low-intensity lower body negative pressure increases sympathoneural traffic to forearm skeletal muscle and increases adrenomedullary secretion without a concomitant generalized increase in sympathoneural outflows. Concurrent deactivation of cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptors during high-intensity lower body negative pressure evokes a more generalized increase in sympathoneural activity, accompanied by further increased adrenomedullary secretion and decreased plasma clearances of noradrenaline and adrenaline. The findings support differential increases in skeletal sympathoneural and adrenomedullary outflows during orthostasis, with more generalized sympathoneural responses to systemic hypotension.

Presynaptic inhibition of norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve endings by endogenous adenosine.

ATP is coreleased with norepinephrine from sympathetic nerve endings and subsequently broken down to adenosine. In animal preparations, adenosine can inhibit norepinephrine release by stimulation of presynaptic receptors. We tested this feedback mechanism in humans by using a specific nucleoside transport inhibitor (draflazine) as a pharmacological tool to allow accumulation of endogenous adenosine in the synaptic cleft. In a dose-finding study on draflazine infusions into the brachial artery (n=10), we identified an optimal dose of 250 ng/min per deciliter of forearm tissue that induced considerable local nucleoside transport inhibition (approximately 40%) without systemic effects. In the main study, we investigated the effects of this draflazine dose on sympathetic-mediated norepinephrine spillover during lower body negative pressure (-25 mm Hg) by the use of the [3H]norepinephrine isotope dilution technique (n=25). Lower body negative pressure induced a significant increase in total body norepinephrine spillover, forearm norepinephrine appearance rate, forearm vascular resistance, and heart rate. During draflazine infusion into the brachial artery, the responses to lower body negative pressure were preserved for all parameters, with the exception of the median increase in forearm norepinephrine appearance rate, which was reduced from 54% to 2% (P <.05). We conclude that accumulation of endogenous adenosine in the synaptic cleft during sympathetic stimulation can inhibit norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve endings.

Effects of insulin on vascular tone and sympathetic nervous system in NIDDM.

Chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system may be a pathogenetic mechanism by which hyperinsulinemia induces cardiovascular damage in insulin-resistant NIDDM patients. The influence of physiological hyperinsulinemia (approximately 700 pmol/l) on basal and stimulated sympathetic outflow was studied in 12 lean normotensive subjects with well-controlled NIDDM without complications and in 13 matched control subjects. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured with forearm plethysmography; sympathetic nervous system activity was assessed by the [3H]norepinephrine (NE) tracer method. NIDDM patients were insulin resistant (glucose infusion rates 31.8 +/- 3.8 vs. 48.7 +/- 2.0 mumol.kg-1.min-1 in control subjects, P < 0.01). After a mixed meal, NIDDM patients showed a hyperinsulinemic response (2-h insulin levels: NIDDM patients 324 +/- 34 pmol/l, control subjects 165 +/- 19 pmol/l, P < 0.001). Insulin infusion induced a vasodilator response (not significantly different between the groups). Arterial plasma NE levels and total-body NE spillover increased significantly (total spillover in NIDDM patients from 0.77 +/- 0.09 to 1.18 +/- 0.16 nmol.m-2.min-1, in control subjects from 0.98 +/- 0.14 to 1.23 +/- 0.18 nmol.m-2.min-1, P < 0.01 for all, not different between groups). Total-body NE clearance did not change. Sympathetic stimulation (lower-body negative pressure [LBNP] 15 mmHg) induced forearm vasoconstriction and increased arterial and venous plasma NE and total NE spillover. Responses of FBF and NE kinetics to LBNP were not significantly different between groups and were not altered by hyperinsulinemia. Although these nonobese subjects with uncomplicated NIDDM showed postprandial hyperinsulinemia and resistance to the effect of insulin on glucose metabolism, this group was not resistant to the vasodilator and sympathetic stimulant effects of insulin. Responses to sympathetic stimuli (LBNP) were normal and unaffected by physiological hyperinsulinemia. Therefore, because of daily life hyperinsulinemia, chronic sympathetic stimulation could be operative in these patients and may explain the increased incidence of hypertension and/or cardiovascular complications.

Chronic alpha-1-adrenergic blockade increases sympathoneural but not adrenomedullary activity in patients with essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Doxazosin, a selective alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, lowers blood pressure by reducing peripheral vascular resistance without causing reflex tachycardia. To discover whether antihypertensive treatment with an alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker is accompanied by an increase in sympathoadrenomedullary activity, we studied plasma catecholamine kinetics before and during treatment with doxazosin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with essential hypertension were studied before and after 3 months' treatment with doxazosin (4-8 mg a day). 3H-noradrenaline and 3H-adrenaline were infused simultaneously and blood samples were collected to calculate plasma catecholamine kinetics before and during sympatho-adrenomedullary stimulation (lower-body negative pressure). RESULTS: Doxazosin decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure and forearm vascular resistance, whereas the heart rate did not change significantly. During doxazosin, baseline arterial plasma noradrenaline increased from 0.97 +/- 0.07 to 1.21 +/- 0.07 nmol/l, and this appeared to be due to an increase in total body noradrenaline spillover from 1.54 +/- 0.15 to 1.84 +/- 0.16 nmol/min; noradrenaline clearance did not change significantly. Forearm noradrenaline spillover also increased, from 0.89 +/- 0.18 to 1.48 +/- 0.23 pmol/100 ml per min. In contrast, arterial plasma adrenaline, total body adrenaline spillover and adrenaline clearance were not significantly affected by doxazosin treatment. The response of plasma noradrenaline and total body and forearm spillover of noradrenaline to lower-body negative pressure (-40 mmHg) was significantly increased during doxazosin administration, whereas the response of the adrenaline kinetic parameters were not altered. CONCLUSIONS: The blood pressure reduction induced by a chronic administration of the alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker doxazosin elicits a baroreceptor-mediated reflexive increase in sympathoneural but not in adrenomedullary activity. The latter finding might partly explain why the heart rate is not increased during chronic treatment with this alpha1-adrenoceptor blocking drug.

Neurohumoral antecedents of vasodepressor reactions.

Vasodepressor (vasovagal) syncope, the most common cause of acute loss of consciousness, can occur in otherwise vigorously healthy people during exposure to stimuli decreasing cardiac filling. Antecedent physiological or neuroendocrine conditions for this dramatic syndrome are poorly understood. This study compared neurocirculatory responses to non-hypotensive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in subjects who subsequently developed vasodepressor reactions during hypotensive LBNP with responses in subjects who did not. In 26 healthy subjects, LBNP at -15 and -40 mmHg was applied to inhibit cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptors. All the subjects tolerated 30 min of LBNP at -15 mmHg, but during subsequent LBNP at -40 mmHg 11 subjects had vasodepressor reactions, with sudden hypotension, nausea, and dizziness. In these subjects, arterial plasma adrenaline responses to LBNP both at -15 and at -40 mmHg exceeded those in subjects who did not experience these reactions. In 16 of the 26 subjects, forearm noradrenaline spillover was measured; in the eight subjects with a vasodepressor reaction, mean forearm noradrenaline spillover failed to increase during LBNP at -15 mmHg (delta = -0.06 +/- (SEM) 0.04 pmol min-1 100mL-1), whereas in the eight subjects without a vasodepressor reaction, mean forearm noradrenaline spillover increased significantly (delta = 0.31 +/- 0.13 pmol min-1 100mL-1). Plasma levels of beta-endorphin during LBNP at -15 mmHg increased in some subjects who subsequently had a vasodepressor reaction during LBNP at -40mmHg. The findings suggest that a neuroendocrine pattern including adrenomedullary stimulation, skeletal sympathoinhibition, and release of endogenous opioids can precede vasodepressor syncope.

Highly sensitive and specific HPLC with fluorometric detection for determination of plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine applied to kinetic studies in humans.

An HPLC separation method combined with fluorometric detection was extended to enable simultaneous assessment of plasma 3H-labeled and endogenous epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE). Forearm fractional extraction (FFE) of 3H-labeled E and NE and of endogenous E was measured in 40 healthy volunteers who were receiving a continuous infusion of 3H-labeled E and NE. Concentrations of arterial and venous E were 26.8 +/- 1.95 (mean +/- SE) and 6.8 +/- 0.75 ng/L, respectively. Arterial and venous NE and dopamine (DA) were also measured, with respective values of 140.7 +/- 8.5 and 192.1 +/- 15.1 for NE, and 13.1 +/- 0.78 and 11.3 +/- 0.70 ng/L for DA. The FFE of 3H-labeled E was slightly but significantly higher (0.790 +/- 0.016) than the that of either 3H-labeled NE or endogenous E (0.748 +/- 0.0146 and 0.745 +/- 0.0185, respectively; P < 0.001), the correlations being highly significant (r = 0.80, P < 0.001) in both cases. The small difference between the FFE of E and of 3H-labeled E allows the calculation of the apparent spillover of E. However, this spillover was negligible compared with forearm NE spillover (0.0112 +/- 0.0031 vs 1.369 +/- 0.128 ng/L per minute. The high sensitivity of this measurement of venous E widens the possibilities for studying E kinetics under physiological conditions.

Plasma metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether tests for plasma metanephrines, the o-methylated metabolites of catecholamines, offer advantages for diagnosis of a pheochromocytoma over standard tests for plasma catecholamines or urinary metanephrines. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: 3 clinical specialist centers. PATIENTS: 52 patients with a pheochromocytoma; 67 normotensive persons and 51 patients with essential hypertension who provided reference values; and 23 patients with secondary hypertension and 50 patients with either heart failure or angina pectoris who served as comparison groups. MEASUREMENTS: Plasma concentrations of catecholamines (norepinephrine and epinephrine) and metanephrines (normetanephrine and metanephrine) were measured in all patients. The 24-hour urinary excretion of metanephrines was measured in 46 patients with pheochromocytoma. RESULTS: Pheochromocytomas were associated with increases in plasma concentrations of metanephrines that were greater and more consistent than those in plasma catecholamine concentrations. No patient with a pheochromocytoma had normal plasma concentrations of both normetanephrine and metanephrine. The sensitivity of these tests was 100% (52 of 52 patients [95% CI, 94% to 100%]), and the negative predictive value of normal plasma concentrations of metanephrines was 100% (162 of 162 patients). Tests for plasma catecholamines yielded eight false-negative results and a sensitivity of 85% (44 of 52 patients [CI, 72% to 93%]). The negative predictive value of normal plasma concentrations of catecholamines was 95% (156 of 164 patients). Tests for urinary metanephrines yielded five false-negative results and a sensitivity of 89% (41 of 46 patients [CI, 76% to 96%]). Because no statistical difference was noted in the number of false-positive results between tests for plasma metanephrines (15%) and tests for plasma catecholamines (18%), the specificities of the two tests did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Normal plasma concentrations of metanephrines exclude the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, whereas normal plasma concentrations of catecholamines and normal urinary excretion of metanephrines do not. Tests for plasma metanephrines are more sensitive than tests for plasma catecholamines or urinary metanephrines for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

Hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of various grades of selective adenosine transport inhibition in humans. Implications for its future role in cardioprotection.

In 12 healthy male volunteers (27-53 yr), a placebo-controlled randomized double blind cross-over trial was performed to study the effect of the intravenous injection of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 mg draflazine (a selective nucleoside transport inhibitor) on hemodynamic and neurohumoral parameters and ex vivo nucleoside transport inhibition. We hypothesized that an intravenous draflazine dosage without effect on hemodynamic and neurohumoral parameters would still be able to augment the forearm vasodilator response to intraarterially infused adenosine. Heart rate (electrocardiography), systolic blood pressure (Dinamap 1846 SX; Critikon, Portanje Electronica BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands) plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine increased dose-dependently and could almost totally be abolished by caffeine pretreatment indicating the involvement of adenosine receptors. Draflazine did not affect forearm blood flow (venous occlusion plethysmography). Intravenous injection of 0.5 mg draflazine did not affect any of the measured hemodynamic parameters but still induced a significant ex vivo nucleoside-transport inhibition of 31.5 +/- 4.1% (P < 0.05 vs placebo). In a subgroup of 10 subjects the brachial artery was cannulated to infuse adenosine (0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, and 50 micrograms/100 ml forearm per min) before and after intravenous injection of 0.5 mg draflazine. Forearm blood flow amounted 1.9 +/- 0.3 ml/100 ml forearm per min for placebo and 1.8 +/- 0.2, 2.0 +/- 0.3, 3.8 +/- 0.9, 6.3 +/- 1.2, 11.3 +/- 2.2, and 19.3 +/- 3.9 ml/100 ml forearm per min for the six incremental adenosine dosages, respectively. After the intravenous draflazine infusion, these values were 1.6 +/- 0.2 ml/100 ml forearm per min for placebo and 2.1 +/- 0.3, 3.3 +/- 0.6, 5.8 +/- 1.1, 6.9 +/- 1.4, 14.4 +/- 2.9, and 23.5 +/- 4.0 ml/100 ml forearm per min, respectively (Friedman ANOVA: P < 0.05 before vs after draflazine infusion). In conclusion, a 30-50% inhibition of adenosine transport significantly augments the forearm vasodilator response to adenosine without significant systemic effects. These results suggest that draflazine is a feasible tool to potentiate adenosine-mediated cardioprotection in man.

Value of the plasma norepinephrine/3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol ratio for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the plasma norepinephrine/3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol ratio (NE/DHPG) is of diagnostic relevance for patients with a pheochromocytoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 18 patients with a histologically proven pheochromocytoma and in nine patients with congestive heart failure, plasma levels of NE, epinephrine (EPI), and DHPG (radioenzymatic method) were determined after 20 minutes of supine rest. In 10 healthy subjects, the plasma catecholamine responses to active standing (5 minutes) and mental arithmetic (5 minutes) were measured. From the plasma NE and DHPG levels, the plasma NE/DHPG ratio was calculated. In order to analyze whether NE or EPI was the major secreted catecholamine, the patients with a pheochromocytoma were divided into two groups based on the increase of plasma NE above normal relative to that of EPI: Group 1 included patients with increased plasma NE or increased plasma NE and EPI. Group 2 included patients with increased plasma EPI in combination with a nearly normal NE. RESULTS: Both active standing and mental arithmetic increased the plasma NE/DHPG ratio by 105% and 13.6%, respectively, but in all subjects the ratio did not exceed 1.0. Patients with heart failure demonstrated a threefold higher plasma NE/DHPG ratio than did healthy subjects, and the ratio also did not exceed 1.0. The plasma NE/DHPG ratio was about seven to eight times higher in Group 1 (mean: 1.62, range: 0.81 to 2.84) than in Group 2 (mean: 0.24, range: 0.12 to 0.68). Nearly all patients in Group 1 had a NE/DHPG ratio that was higher than 1.0. In contrast, five of six samples of Group 2 demonstrated a NE/DHPG ratio within the normal range. The calculated positive and negative predictive values of a basal plasma catecholamine level were higher than that for the plasma NE/DHPG ratio. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to earlier reports, a normal plasma NE/DHPG ratio does not exclude the presence of a pheochromocytoma. In patients with a pheochromocytoma that produces EPI predominantly, this ratio may be normal. On the other hand, in patients with congestive heart failure, the plasma NE/DHPG ratio is increased, although there is no clear overlap with values of patients with a pheochromocytoma. Although the prevalence of pure EPI-producing pheochromocytomas is low, the plasma NE/DHPG ratio should be used with caution in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with a suspected pheochromocytoma.

Adenosine attenuates the response to sympathetic stimuli in humans.

The effect of adenosine on the forearm vasoconstrictor response to alpha-adrenergic and sympathetic stimulation was studied in healthy volunteers. During a predilated state achieved by infusion of sodium nitroprusside into the branchial artery, subsequent infusion of norepinephrine induced a mean increase in forearm vascular resistance of 571%, whereas this response was only 270% when an equipotent vasodilator dose of adenosine was used instead of sodium nitroprusside (nitroprusside versus adenosine, p less than 0.05, n = 6). A comparable difference was found when the endogenous release of norepinephrine was stimulated by the local infusion of tyramine, with tyramine-induced increments in forearm vascular resistance of 438% during nitroprusside versus 93% during adenosine (n = 6, p less than 0.05). During these tyramine infusions a similar increase in the calculated forearm norepinephrine overflow occurred in the adenosine and the nitroprusside tests. In a third experiment, we demonstrated that adenosine also reduced the vasoconstrictor response to lower body negative pressure, an endogenous stimulus, of the sympathetic nervous system. During nitroprusside, lower body negative pressure induced an increase in forearm vascular resistance of 135%, whereas this was 39% during adenosine (n = 6, p less than 0.05). We conclude that adenosine attenuates the response to sympathetic nervous system-mediated vasoconstriction in humans, and that this effect may at least partly be explained by a postsynaptic inhibition of alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction. Therefore, we think that adenosine may be an important endogenous modulator of sympathetic nervous system activity in humans.

Adenosine attenuates the vasoconstrictor response to the cold pressor test in humans.

The forearm vasoconstrictor response to a standardized cold pressor test (CPT) was studied twice in eight healthy subjects, once during local intraarterial infusion of adenosine and once during infusion of equipotent dosages of the control vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP). During local SNP infusion, the forearm vascular resistance (FVR) decreased from 70 +/- 14 to 30 +/- 7 arbitrary units (AU). Adenosine induced a comparable vasodilator response, with a decrease in FVR from 56 +/- 14 to 28 +/- 6 AU. Subsequent cold exposure induced a mean percentage increase in FVR of 62 +/- 17% during SNP, whereas the increase was only 27 +/- 12% during adenosine infusion (p = 0.014). There were no differences in the calculated cold-induced changes in forearm production of norepinephrine (NE) between the SNP and the adenosine tests. We conclude that adenosine attenuates forearm vasoconstrictor response to the CPT, probably by a postjunctional mechanism of action.