Current Dietetic Internship Admission Criteria and Selection Processes: Results From an Electronic Survey of Directors.

BACKGROUND: Members of the dietetics profession have been discussing and confronting the lack of diversity within the profession. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is committed to diversity and inclusion efforts. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine current admission criteria and practices used by Dietetic Internships (DIs) across the United States. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study using electronic survey with open and close-ended items conducted in the fall of 2020. PARTICIPANTS: The electronic survey was distributed to 261 DI directors. Statistical analysis performed Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable using SPSS software. Six topically related open-ended items were analyzed through a qualitative thematic approach. RESULTS: DI directors (n = 89) were primarily female (n = 76) and White (n = 77). Most admissions process and criteria decisions were made by committees. Directors (n = 79) reported using a predefined rubric/scoring system for candidate evaluation. Many (n = 60) indicated not using Graduate Record Examination scores. All reported considering Didactic Program in Dietetics' grade point average; personal statement quality; professional interests and goals; and type and quantity of previous dietetics-related work and volunteer experience. The admission factors rated (on a 7-point scale) most important were quality of interview (mean = 6.03), Didactic Program in Dietetics' grade point average (mean = 5.67), type of work and volunteer experience (mean = 5.62), quality of personal statement (mean = 5.5), recommender comments (mean = 5.41), and quantity of work and volunteer experience (mean = 5.40). Most (n = 80) indicated that they were satisfied with their selection processes. CONCLUSIONS: Educators should continue refining admissions processes as professional gatekeepers, consider reducing application fees, diversifying and training selection committees, re-evaluating admission criteria, and assessing how criteria weights.

Developing a Questionnaire to Evaluate College Students' Knowledge, Attitude, Behavior, Self-efficacy, and Environmental Factors Related to Canned Foods.

OBJECTIVE: Develop a questionnaire to measure students' knowledge, attitude, behavior, self-efficacy, and environmental factors related to the use of canned foods. METHODS: The Knowledge-Attitude-Behavior Model, Social Cognitive Theory, and Canned Foods Alliance survey were used as frameworks for questionnaire development. Cognitive interviews were conducted with college students (n = 8). Nutrition and survey experts assessed content validity. Reliability was measured via Cronbach α and 2 rounds (1, n = 81; 2, n = 65) of test-retest statistics. Means and frequencies were used. RESULTS: The 65-item questionnaire had a test-retest reliability of .69. Cronbach α scores were .87 for knowledge (9 items), .86 for attitude (30 items), .80 for self-efficacy (12 items), .68 for canned foods use (8 items), and .30 for environment (6 items). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: A reliable questionnaire was developed to measure perceptions and use of canned foods. Nutrition educators may find this questionnaire useful to evaluate pretest-posttest changes from canned foods-based interventions among college students.