RESUMO
Introduction: Dual-task walking is common in daily life but becomes more difficult with aging. Little is known about the neurobiological mechanisms affecting competing cognitive demands. Translational studies with human and animal models are needed to address this gap. This pilot study investigated the feasibility of implementing a novel cross-species dual-task model in humans and rats and aimed to establish preliminary evidence that the model induces a dual-task cost. Methods: Young and older humans and rats performed an object discrimination task (OD), a baseline task of typical walking (baseline), an alternation turning task on a Figure 8 walking course (Alt), and a dual-task combining object discrimination with the alternation task (AltOD). Primary behavioral assessments including walking speed and correct selections for object discrimination and turning direction. In humans, left prefrontal cortex activity was measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Results: Human subjects generally performed well on all tasks, but the older adults exhibited a trend for a slowing of walking speed immediately before the turning decision for Alt and AltOD compared to baseline. Older adults also had heightened prefrontal activity relative to young adults for the Alt and AltOD tasks. Older rodents required more training than young rodents to learn the alternation task. When tested on AltOD with and without a 15-s delay between trials, older rodents exhibited a substantial performance deficit for the delayed version on the initial day of testing. Old rats, however, did not show a significant slowing in walking speed with increasing task demand, as was evident in the young rats. Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility and challenges associated with implementing a cross-species dual-task model. While there was preliminary evidence of dual-task cost in both humans and rats, the magnitude of effects was small and not consistent across species. This is likely due to the relative ease of each task in humans and the walking component in rats not being sufficiently challenging. Future versions of this test should make the cognitive tasks more challenging and the motor task in rats more complex.
RESUMO
Inclusion of female subjects in preclinical biomedical research is imperative for understanding mechanisms of age-related cognitive decline, as more than half of individuals older than 65 are female. In rodents, however, few behavioral and physical assessments have been conducted in both sexes within the same study. The current article documents data obtained from young and aged rats of both sexes that performed a battery of cognitive and physical assessments to examine for potential interactions between sex and age. Physical performance was measured with a rotarod test of motor coordination, assessment of maximum grip strength, and swim speed. While females outperformed males in rotarod and grip strength, there was also an age-dependent decline in physical performance in both sexes. Cognitive assessments included the Morris watermaze test of hippocampal dependent spatial memory and a biconditional association task with a working memory (WM) component, both of which were not significantly different across sex. Notably, a cognitive dual task that simultaneously tests working memory (WM) and biconditional association task (BAT) acquisition has previously been shown to be more sensitive to age-related cognitive decline than the watermaze in male rats, which is replicated here in both female and male rats. Furthermore, young and aged females (<27 months) spent a similar percent of time in each estrus cycle phase and phase did not influence WM/BAT performance. Future studies utilizing similar behavioral paradigms to examine the neurobiology of cognitive aging should be representative of the human population they intend to model through the inclusion of female subjects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
