Impact of Cofacilitated, Collaborative, Recovery-Oriented Practice Training on Clinical Mental Health Workforce Competencies.

OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to evaluate the impact of a staff development training program informed by the collaborative recovery model (CRM) on staff outcomes in the largest implementation of CRM undertaken by a public clinical mental health service. METHODS: Implementation spanned community, rehabilitation, inpatient, and crisis programs for children and youths, adults, and older persons in metropolitan Melbourne, 2017-2018. The CRM staff development program was cofacilitated and coproduced by trainers with clinical and lived experience of recovery (including caregivers) and delivered to the mental health workforce (N=729, including medical, nursing, allied health, lived experience, and leadership staff). The 3-day training program was supplemented by booster training and coaching in team-based reflective practice. Pre- and posttraining measures assessed changes in self-reported CRM-related knowledge, attitudes, skills, and confidence and in the perceived importance of CRM implementation. Staff definitions of recovery were analyzed to understand changes in language related to collaborative recovery. RESULTS: The staff development program significantly (p<0.001) improved self-rated knowledge, attitudes, and skills in applying CRM. At booster training, improvements in attitudes and self-confidence in implementing CRM were maintained. Ratings of the importance of CRM and confidence in the organization's implementation did not change. Definitions of recovery illustrated development of shared language throughout the large mental health program. CONCLUSIONS: The cofacilitated CRM staff development program achieved significant changes in staff knowledge, attitudes, skills, and confidence and changes in language related to recovery. These results suggest that implementing collaborative, recovery-oriented practice in a large public mental health program is feasible and can result in broad and sustainable change.

A critical review of the first six months of operation of a trial Hospital Outreach Post-suicidal Engagement (HOPE) service in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To review the Hospital Outreach Post-suicidal Engagement (HOPE) service in the first six months of the pilot program in a metropolitan Melbourne setting, including a description of: (a) socio-demographic, health and psychosocial stressors of people referred; (b) method of presentation; (c) interventions provided and (d) outcomes measured. METHOD: A retrospective case file analysis reviewed the first six months of HOPE service operation. RESULTS: Forty people received HOPE service during the study period, 60% female, mean age 35 years (range 17-58). The majority had previously engaged in self-harm (72.5%) or attempted suicide (67.5%). Stressors included social isolation, relationship breakdown, unemployment, financial stress, medical problems, history of mental illness, exposure to family violence and adverse childhood events. Statistically significant improvements occurred in the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and Session Rating Scale (SRS) following intervention. There were no deaths by suicide during the study period. CONCLUSION: People referred to HOPE had significant health and psychosocial stressors. Engagement significantly improved subjective well-being and connection with supports. Findings highlighted the need for an integrated clinical and psychosocial model to promote hope and connection in life post suicide attempt. It remains unclear which interventions improved well-being and if this contributes to suicide prevention.

Making sense of it together: Youth & families co-create sensory modulation assessment and intervention in community mental health settings to optimise daily life.

INTRODUCTION: Occupational therapists work collaboratively with young people experiencing mental ill-health to enable meaningful occupational participation in daily life. Sensory modulation is used as a means of developing self-regulation and enabling occupational participation. Published literature on sensory modulation in mental health settings is primarily located within acute inpatient settings and focuses on self-regulation. Little is known about the use of sensory modulation within community settings to enhance occupational participation in daily lives of people with mental-ill health. This study investigated the experiences of young people and their families who engaged in sensory modulation assessment (Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile) and intervention (between one and twelve sessions) as part of community mental health care at a large area mental health service in Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: The qualitative study used naturalistic inquiry methodology involving semi-structured interviews with six young people and three families. Nine interview transcripts were thematically analysed to elicit the experiences of sensory modulation assessment and intervention, and how this may influence daily life. RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed that young people and their families' positive experiences of sensory modulation were underpinned by processes of co-creation: (a) knowing yourself; (b) understanding 'the why': developing shared reasons for engaging in sensory modulation; (c) creating comfort; (d) creating connection; and (e) constantly learning. Sensory modulation supported occupational participation in young peoples' daily lives in the areas of sleep, study, relationships, self-care, independent living, being in the world, and doing new things. CONCLUSION: Young people and their families valued the process of co-creating sensory modulation assessment and intervention to enhance occupational participation. Results revealed that sensory modulation assessment and intervention was optimised when it was a process of co-creation. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of sensory modulation in enhancing occupational participation in these domains that influence daily life.