Obstacles to food security, food pantry use, and educational success among university students: a mixed methods approach.

Purpose. This study contrasts views of university students with very low or high food security scores with respect to: obstacles to healthy eating, food pantry use, and managing dietary and educational needs. Method. Comments on open-ended survey questions (n = 1374) were counted, compared, and thematically analyzed to discern differences between the two student groups. Results. Cost concerns were paramount among students with very low food security scores. Students with very low food security experienced significant challenges in reconciling dietary needs and long-term educational goals; this was not problematic among students with high food security. Students from both very low and high food security groups mostly expressed an openness to the campus food pantry, though stigma associated with its use remained a deterrent. Conclusion. While all students face similar challenges to healthy eating, food security status substantially shapes dietary health and the management of dietary and educational needs.

University student food insecurity and academic performance.

Objective: Characterize the prevalence and dimensions of student food insecurity and the associations with academic performance. Participants: An online survey was distributed (November 2017) to 13,897 undergraduates at a midsized, New Jersey Public University; 2,055 (15%) responded. Methods: Demographic, behavioral, and food security data from University IT services, and the survey were combined in a single dataset. The USDA food security index was adapted to assess food insecurity. Results: Forty-eight percent of students were food insecure. Odds were higher for: women, African Americans, Hispanics, students with partial or no meal plan, commuters, and students receiving financial assistance. Food insecurity increased the odds of being among the lower 10% GPA and reduced the odds of being among the upper 10% GPA. Conclusions: Food insecurity among university students is high and is associated with academic performance. Understanding the mechanisms underlying this relationship is essential to design programs to address this problem.

Implantable direct current stimulation in para-axial cervical arthrodesis.

This retrospective, case-controlled pilot study was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of an implantable direct current bone growth stimulator (IDCBGS) as an adjunct to cervical arthrodesis in patients at high risk for nonunion after undergoing cervical fusion in region from the occiput to C3. Twenty patients underwent para-axial cervical arthrodesis (involving posterior spine fusion and instrumentation using standard surgical techniques) for the correction of instability. All were at high risk for nonunion due to advanced age, rheumatoid arthritis, prior failed fusion attempts, infection, or immunosuppressive drug use. An IDCBGS was used to augment the surgical procedure. The mean follow-up period was 19 months, and 16 patients were available for follow-up. Radiographic evidence of fusion was demonstrated in 15 of 16 patients (94%). After surgery, all patients demonstrated clinical stabilization, a resolution of symptoms in combination with an improvement in neurologic status, or both. The mean elapsed time before fusion occurred was 4.6 months. No neurologic complications related to cathode or generator placement were observed. The use of the stimulator as an adjunct to instrument- or non-instrument-assisted surgical fusion of the para-axial region in these high-risk patients appeared both safe and efficacious. Further investigation is warranted to define the possible role and clinical utility of the IDCBGS in selected patients requiring cervical fusion, particularly those at high risk for nonunion.

A prospective outcomes study of patients undergoing intradiscal electrothermy (IDET) for chronic low back pain.

This prospective, non-randomized clinical trial was designed to determine the clinical outcome of patients who underwent Intradiscal Electrotherapy (IDET) for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Twenty-seven consecutive patients undergoing IDET were prospectively evaluated. All patients, as determined by provocative discography and/or MRI, had discogenic disease with chronic low back pain and were non-responsive to conservative treatment for at least 6 months. The mean pre-operative duration of symptoms was 38 months. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Joint Section Lumbar Disc Herniation Study Questionnaire, which includes the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Short Form (SF) -36 Health Status Questionnaire, was used. The follow-up endpoint for all patients was one year. Seventy-five percent of patients improved based upon the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire while only 48% of patients were found to improve on the SF-36 Survey. The SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale did improve relative to other subscales in 52% of patients. There was no relationship found between outcome and duration of symptoms (p= .32), number of levels treated (p= .20), or worker's compensation (p= .38). There were no complications that resulted from the IDET treatment. IDET was found to be effective in 75% of patients in improving their chronic low back pain. This did not translate into a significant improvement in the SF-36 survey scores. The risks are negligible, and recovery time is minimal. The procedure may be useful in selected patients who would otherwise undergo an interbody fusion procedure.