Exogenous supplementation of antithrombin III in adult and pediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombin III deficiency can occur with heparin anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation leading to heparin resistance. Antithrombin III supplementation has been shown to improve anticoagulation; however, there is no consensus on appropriate administration. We described the effect of antithrombin III supplementation on coagulation parameters in adult and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records of patients who received ⩾1 dose of antithrombin III during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation while on continuous heparin. Endpoints included the change in anti-Xa levels and antithrombin III activity at -6 versus 6 h relative to antithrombin III supplementation, and heparin infusion rates at 6 versus 12 h after antithrombin III supplementation. RESULTS: Eighteen patients receiving 36 antithrombin III administrations were analyzed. Mean (standard deviation) anti-Xa values at -6 versus 6 h were 0.15 (0.07) versus 0.24 (0.15) IU/mL (p-value: 0.250) for pediatrics and 0.19 (0.22) versus 0.31 (0.27) IU/mL (p-value: 0.052) for adults. Mean (standard deviation) plasma antithrombin III activity at the same intervals were 32% (14.2%) versus 66.8% (25.1%; p-value: 0.062) for pediatrics and 30.3% (14%) versus 52.8% (8.1%; p-value: 0.094) for adults. Mean (standard deviation) heparin rates at 6 versus 12 h after antithrombin III for pediatrics were 23.6 (6) versus 23.5 (6.5) units/kg/h (p-value: 0.728), and 15.3 (6.6) versus 13.5 (8) units/kg/h (p-value: 0.188) for adults. CONCLUSION: Administration of antithrombin III improved anti-Xa levels in both populations, however, did not significantly reduce heparin rates. Our findings suggest that the use of antithrombin III restores heparin responsiveness in patients with low antithrombin III activity and low anti-Xa activity.

The misdiagnosis of epilepsy in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy is common in people with intellectual disabilities. Epilepsy can be difficult to diagnose and may be misdiagnosed in around 25% of cases. A systematic review was conducted to explore: (i) How common the misdiagnosis of epilepsy is amongst people with intellectual disabilities. (ii) Reasons for misdiagnosis of epilepsy. (iii) Implications of misdiagnosis. (iv) Improving diagnosis. METHODS: Primary studies and systematic reviews published in the English language between 1998 and 2008 were identified from electronic databases, experts, the Internet, grey literature, and citation tracking. Included studies were critically appraised by team members using the appraisal tools produced by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) at the Public Health Resource Unit, Oxford. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the review and critically appraised: six cohort studies and two case studies. Where data was provided in the cohort studies between 32% and 38% of people with intellectual disabilities were diagnosed as not having epilepsy or as having nonepileptic events. The main reason for misdiagnosis was the misinterpretation of behavioural, physiological, syndrome related, medication related or psychological events by parents, paid carers and health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Those working in epilepsy and intellectual disability services and families must be made more aware of the possibility of misdiagnosis. Future research is needed about the misdiagnosis of epilepsy amongst people with intellectual disabilities and carer knowledge.