RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Outpatient mental health care in the United States is delivered by an uncoordinated patchwork of public and private entities that struggle to effectively differentiate the care they provide. The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed transformative changes in this space, including rapid adoption of telehealth and escalating private sector investment to provide services for individuals wishing to obtain care through insurance. In this article, we briefly review the current landscape of ambulatory mental health care. Utilizing Kissick's Iron Triangle model of health care delivery, we compare the relative strengths and weaknesses of academic medical centers and the growing private sector, entities potentially positioned to synergistically foster a mental health ecosystem with improved quality, access, and cost-effectiveness. A roadmap for strategic integration is presented for how academic centers-institutions frequently overwhelmed by patient volume-might leverage partnerships with a private sector eager to utilize novel technology to improve access, demonstrate data-driven outcomes, and advocate for improved reimbursement from payers. We also assess the potential risks and pitfalls of such collaboration. In return, academic institutions can refocus on their strengths, including research, systems knowledge, quality-improvement initiatives, education and training, and specialty clinical care.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Estados Unidos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Setor Privado/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented unprecedented challenges to the provision of inpatient psychiatric care. The nature of the physical plant, programmatic constraints, and the patient population required a rapid and agile approach to problem-solving under conditions of uncertainty and stress. Flexibility in decision-making, excellent communication, an effective working relationship with infection prevention and control experts, and attention to staff morale and support were important elements of successful provision of care to our inpatients. We present our experience, lessons learned, and recommendations should a resurgence of the pandemic or a similar crisis occur.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , COVID-19 , Pacientes Internados , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/psicologia , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/normas , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/normasRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced new ethical challenges in the care of patients with serious psychiatric illness who require inpatient treatment and who may have beeen exposed to COVID-19 or have mild to moderate COVID-19 but refuse testing and adherence to infection prevention protocols. Such situations increase the risk of infection to other patients and staff on psychiatric inpatient units. We discuss medical and ethical considerations for navigating this dilemma and offer a set of policy recommendations.