Is the Tunnel Technique More Effective Than Open Augmentation With a Titanium-Reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation?

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that horizontal ridge augmentation with a nonresorbable membrane is subject to a relatively frequent occurrence of dehiscence and loss of the graft. This study was designed to compare the outcomes of a tunnel technique versus an open technique using a titanium-reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, in which the data were collected by chart review, was designed to compare patients who had undergone horizontal ridge augmentation with a 1:1 ratio of mineralized freeze-dried allograft and particulate bovine hydroxyapatite by the tunnel technique with patients who had undergone an open technique with a titanium-reinforced PTFE membrane. The incidence of wound dehiscence or membrane exposure, the number of postoperative visits required, and the number of systemic antibiotic courses needed, as well as the number of grafted sites that subsequently were amenable to routine implant placement after graft maturation, were compared between the 2 techniques. The differences in implants placed between the 2 methods were analyzed with the Fisher exact test. The secondary hypothesis (regarding wound dehiscence, number of postoperative visits, and number of systemic antibiotic courses) was analyzed by Poisson regression. RESULTS: The chart review found 52 patients, with 21 treated by the tunnel technique and 31 treated with the open technique. Within 6 months after bone grafting, 18 patients (86%) treated with tunnel technique grafts received dental implants whereas 22 patients (71%) treated with the open technique received dental implants. Dehiscence developed in a greater proportion of ridge augmentations with the PTFE method (52% vs 19%). There was a trend toward an increased number of courses of antibiotics prescribed for this group (P = .11), as well as a significant increase in the number of postoperative visits required (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: For horizontal defects amenable to either technique, the findings of this study show the tunnel technique is a more cost-effective option with similar success to the open technique.

Use of Transalveolar Sutures in Conjunction With Grafting to Preserve Vestibular Depth and Augment Gingival Thickness Around Mandibular Implants.

Preservation or reconstruction of the soft tissues around dental implants is an essential component of implant dentistry. Increased width and thickness of the keratinized tissue surrounding dental implants has been recognized as an important factor associated with long-term implant success. When extractions and ridge reduction are performed concurrently with implant placement, maintaining vestibular depth also is of utmost importance. A previous report described a technique for applying bone-anchoring sutures to preserve keratinized tissue and vestibular depth around implants. The present report describes a variation of the procedure for the simultaneous correction of situations in which the existing keratinized tissue is thin and narrow and preserving and apically positioning it might not provide an appropriate gingival cuff.

Prevalence of third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in young adults.

PURPOSE: We assessed the prevalence of caries experience and periodontal pathology on asymptomatic third molars in young adults. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy subjects with 4 asymptomatic third molars were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved study during a 5-year period. Full mouth periodontal probing, 6 sites per tooth, was the measure of clinical periodontal status. The presence or absence of occlusal caries experience (carious lesions or restorations, including sealants) on third molars and on any surface of the first and second molars were assessed using a visual-tactile examination and panoramic radiographs. The primary outcome measures were at least 1 periodontal probing depth of at least 4 mm versus none and caries experience versus no caries experience. RESULTS: The data were analyzed from 409 subjects, who averaged 25 years old. More subjects were female (53%) and white (76%). More subjects had at least 1 periodontal probing depth of 4 mm or deeper on a third molar (55%) than on the distal of a second molar (46%). These findings were more likely to be detected around a third molar in subjects with all third molars at the occlusal plane (72%) than in subjects with at least one third molar below (33%). Overall, fewer subjects were affected by third molar caries experience than first or second molars (24% vs 73%, respectively). Of the subset of subjects with all four third molars at the occlusal plane, 26% were affected by both third molar periodontal pathology and caries experience and 16% were caries and periodontal pathology free. CONCLUSIONS: In these cross-sectional analyses, periodontal pathology was detected more frequently on third molars than on first and second molars and caries experience was detected more frequently on first and second molars than on third molars.