Pulmonary rehabilitation referral and uptake from primary care for people living with COPD: a mixed-methods study.

Healthcare service and patient barriers contribute to low referral to and uptake of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Solutions should support skilled clinician-patient conversations and span primary care-PR boundaries to prevent disjointed working. http://bit.ly/2PVKHZf.

Success and failure in integrated models of nursing for long term conditions: multiple case studies of whole systems.

BACKGROUND: Current projections indicate that the UK faces a 252% increase in people aged over 65 with one or more long term conditions (LTC) by 2050. Nurses, managing their own caseloads and clinics, working across sectors and organisational boundaries and as part of a wider multi-disciplinary team, are frequently seen as key to managing this growing demand. However, the evidence base informing the nursing role in managing LTC, the most effective configuration of the multi-disciplinary team and the policy evidence relating to the infrastructure required to support cross organisational working, remains weak. OBJECTIVES: To explore, identify and characterise the origins, processes and outcomes of effective chronic disease management models and the nursing contributions to such models. DESIGN: Case study whole systems analysis using qualitative interview methods. SETTINGS: Two community matron services, two primary care (GP) practice nursing services, two hospital based specialist nursing services were purposefully sampled from across England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Selection criteria were derived using a consensus conference. The nurses in the service, all patients and carers on the caseload, members of the multi-disciplinary team and stakeholders were invited to participate. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with all participants, thematic analysis within a whole system framework. RESULTS: The study found high levels of clinical nursing expertise which in the case of the community matrons was meeting the aim of reducing hospital admissions. Both the primary care and hospital nurse specialist indicate similar levels of clinical expertise which was highly valued by medical colleagues and patients. Patients continued to experience fragmented care determined by diagnostic categories rather than patient need and by the specific remit of the clinic or service the patient was using. Patient data systems are still organised around the impact on services and prevalence of disease at an individual level and not around the patient experience of disease. CONCLUSION: Nurses are making a major contribution to meeting the policy objectives for long term conditions. Primary care nurses and hospital nurse specialists do broadly similar roles. The scope of the nursing roles and services studied were idiosyncratic, opportunistic and reactive, rather than planned and commissioned on an analysis of local population need.

The nursing contribution to chronic disease management: a case of public expectation? Qualitative findings from a multiple case study design in England and Wales.

BACKGROUND: The global response to the rise in prevalence of chronic disease is a focus on the way services are managed and delivered, in which nurses are seen as central in shaping patient experience. However, there is relatively little known on how patients perceive the changes to service delivery envisaged by chronic care models. OBJECTIVES: The PEARLE project aimed to explore, identify and characterise the origins, processes and outcomes of effective chronic disease management models and the nursing contributions to the models. Design, settings and participants Case study design of seven sites in England and Wales ensuring a range of chronic disease management models. Participants included over ninety patients and family carers ranging in age from children to older people with conditions such as diabetes, respiratory disease, epilepsy, or coronary heart disease. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with patients and family carers. Focus groups were conducted with adolescents and children. A whole systems approach guided data collection and data were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Despite nurses' role and skill development and the shift away from the acute care model, the results suggested that patients had a persisting belief in the monopoly of expertise continuing to exist in the acute care setting. Patients were more satisfied if they saw the nurse as diagnostician, prescriber and medical manager of the condition. Patients were less satisfied when they had been transferred from an established doctor-led to nurse-led service. While nurses within the study were highly skilled, patient perception was guided by the familiar rather than most appropriate service delivery. Most patients saw chronic disease management as a medicalised approach and the nursing contribution was most valued when emulating it. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' preferences and expectations of chronic disease management were framed by a strongly biomedical discourse. Perceptions of nurse-led chronic disease management were often shaped by what was previously familiar to the patient. At a strategic level, autonomous nursing practice requires support and further promotion to wider society if there is to be a shift in societal expectation and trust in the nurse's role in chronic disease management.