Emergent transesophageal echocardiography in hemodynamically unstable obstetric patients.

BACKGROUND: The obstetric population has an increasing incidence of comorbid conditions. These, coupled with the possibility of acute embolic events involving air, amniotic fluid, and thrombus, increase the likelihood of hemodynamic instability. Although the utility of transesophageal echocardiography to guide management in cardiac and high-risk, non-cardiac surgical populations has been well established, the emergent use in critically-ill parturients has not been comprehensively evaluated. METHODS: Using our departmental transesophageal echocardiography database of 28 293 examinations, parturients were identified who underwent emergent transesophageal echocardiography for evaluation of hemodynamic instability, including cardiac arrest, between January 1999 and March 2014. Transesophageal echocardiography findings and their impact on patient management were analyzed. RESULTS: Ten peripartum patients were evaluated. Six patients became unstable during dilation and evacuation procedures; one after a forceps delivery; one during and one after cesarean delivery; and one during a postpartum laparotomy. Six patients proceeded to cardiac arrest; however, all women survived their initial operation and resuscitation. Transesophageal echocardiography was instrumental in determining the etiology and guiding resuscitation in all 10 patients including emergent cardiac surgical intervention with cardiopulmonary bypass (n=2). Seven patients survived to hospital discharge, but three died after experiencing neurologic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Severe hemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest can occur in previously healthy parturients in pregnancy. Our data suggest that emergent transesophageal echocardiography is a valuable tool in determining the etiology and directing therapy of refractory hypotension or cardiac arrest in obstetric patients.

Blood volume measurement by hemodilution: association with valve disease and re-evaluation of the Allen Formula.

BACKGROUND: Total blood volume (TBV) assessment is central to the management of cardiac surgical patients with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The widely accepted Allen Formula lacks accuracy in estimating TBV in these patients. Moreover, the impact of commonly encountered cardiac disease states on TBV has not been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to determine TBV by hemodilution (TBVHD) for patients with valve disease, compare TBVHD to algorithms frequently used during cardiac surgery and to modify the Allen Formula to better fit today's patient population. METHODS: TBVHD was prospectively measured upon initiation of CPB. Ninety-six patients were grouped into 4 cohorts by preoperative diagnosis and compared to Allen and weight-based formulae in a univariate analysis: mitral regurgitation (MR), coronary artery disease requiring bypass surgery (CABG) and aortic stenosis (AS) ± CABG. The independent effects of height and weight on TBV were correlated to the original Allen Formula by multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Patients with MR had significantly larger TBVHD compared to patients with AS, CABG or both. The smallest TBVHD was found in the patients with AS and CABG. The modified Allen Formula had an excellent model fit (R(2) = 0.88 and R(2) = 0.95 for males and females, respectively; p<0.001) while the classic formula overestimated TBV by 30% in males and females. For males, height impacted TBV calculations the most whereas weight was the predominant determinant in females. CONCLUSION: Blood volume assessment via the Allen Formula or bodyweight overestimated TBV in cardiac surgical patients, with potential implications on their management. The assumption that MR frequently presents with increased intravascular volume was confirmed whereas AS patients with coronary disease had a relatively smaller TBV. Lastly, a modified Allen Formula to better reflect today's patient population was derived to reproducibly improve accuracy in mathematical estimates of TBV.