Childhood cancer: patterns of protocol participation in a national survey.

Cancer is still the chief cause of death by disease in children, ages one to 14. As improved survival rates have been reported for pediatric cancer patients who are treated on controlled clinical trials, it is important to understand the national utilization of such protocols. In 1993, a survey of childhood cancer was conducted by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons. Data regarding type of disease, protocol participation, age, sex, race, insurance, and geographical region were voluntarily submitted by more than 200 hospital cancer registries. Included in this study were 2,208 children and adolescents 21 years of age or younger who were diagnosed in 1987, and 2,293 who were diagnosed in 1992. Pediatric centers (i.e., members of the Pediatric Oncology Group or Children's Cancer Group) submitted 55.1% of the cases and other institutions, 44.9%. It was found that more patients treated at pediatric centers were on protocols (53.8%) than were those treated at other institutions (25.1%). In general, the younger the patient (five years of age or younger), the greater the chance of being on protocol (pediatric centers, 63.7%; others, 42.0%), with very poor adolescent protocol participation (pediatric centers, 34.8%; others, 12.1%). Nevertheless, overall protocol participation was still lower than expected, even in children younger than five years of age, and adolescent participation in controlled clinical trials was low and similar to adult figures. The percentage of childhood cancer cases seen at pediatric centers was smaller than in other series. It was concluded that pediatric cancer centers need to continue to encourage patient participation in controlled clinical trials, with special emphasis on adolescents.

Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Initial studies of sentinel lymphadenectomy for patients with breast carcinoma confirmed that the status of the sentinel lymph nodes was an accurate predictor of the presence of metastatic disease in the axillary lymph nodes. Sentinel lymphadenectomy, as an axillary staging procedure, has risks of morbidity that have yet to be defined. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a two-phase protocol that included concurrent data collection of patient characteristics and treatment variables. During the first (validation) phase, 72 patients underwent sentinel lymph node excision followed by a level I-II axillary dissection. After the technique had been established, the second phase commenced, during which only patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes underwent an axillary dissection. RESULTS: During the second phase, lymphedema was identified in 9 of 303 patients (3.0%) who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy alone and in 20 of 117 patients (17.1%) who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy combined with axillary dissection (P < 0.0001). Of 303 patients who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy alone, 8 of 155 patients (5.1%) with tumors located in the upper outer quadrant and 1 of 148 patients (0.7%) with tumors in other locations developed lymphedema (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing lymphedema after undergoing sentinel lymphadenectomy was measurable but significantly lower than after undergoing axillary dissection. Tumor location in the upper outer quadrant and postoperative trauma and/or infection were identifiable risk factors for lymphedema.

Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study.

BACKGROUND: Advances in surgical techniques and changes in our understanding of the biology of breast cancer have made immediate or early breast reconstruction a viable option for the majority of women with breast cancer. Little is known about national patterns of use of reconstruction. This study was undertaken to determine national patterns of care and factors that influence the use of breast reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: A large convenience sample reported to the National Cancer Data Base was studied. Patients coded as undergoing mastectomy between 1985 and 1990 (n = 155,463) and between 1994 and 1995 (n = 68,348) were evaluated. The use of reconstruction in the two time periods was compared, and patient and tumor factors influencing the use of the procedure were compared. RESULTS: Between 1985 and 1990, 3.4% of mastectomy patients had early or immediate reconstruction, increasing to 8.3% in 1994-5. Patient age, income, geographic location, type of hospital where treatment occurred, and tumor stage all influenced the use of reconstruction in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, patients age 50 or under had a 4.3-fold greater likelihood of having reconstruction than their older counterparts. Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ were twice as likely as those with invasive cancer to have reconstruction. Family income of $40,000 or more (Odds Ratio 2.0), ethnicity other than African-American (Odds Ratio 1.6), surgery in a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center (Odds Ratio 1.4), and surgery in a geographic region other than the Midwest or South (Odds Ratio 1.3) remained significant predictors of the use of reconstruction in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction is an underused option in breast cancer management. Predictors of the use of reconstruction do not reflect contraindications to the procedure, and indicate the need for both physician and patient education.

The diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast.

The widespread utilization of screening mammography has produced a shift in the stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in the US: Currently, 12% to 15% of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases annually are ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). The diagnosis is made, in at least 90% of patients, with mammography. Only about 10% of patients will have a palpable mass. The accurate characterization and visualization of calcifications typically requires magnification of mammographic imaging. The morphology of the calcifications is generally considered to be the most important factor in differentiating benign from malignant formations. Round and uniform shapes are more likely to be benign, while linear and heterogeneous morphologies are associated with DCIS. Following a complete mammographic work-up, most suspicious lesions are potential candidates for a stereotactic core needle biopsy. Ten percent to 50% of patients initially diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia by needle biopsy have subsequently been surgically diagnosed with cancer near the biopsy site. Due to this relatively high incidence of co-existent carcinoma, a needle biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia necessitates subsequent surgical excision. The most important change in our thinking about DCIS was from a monolithic view, conceiving of DCIS as a single disease highly likely to invade if left untreated, to the realization that DCIS represents a non-obligate precursor with a variable risk of progression, depending on a combination of factors, such as histology, lesion, size, and margin status. In discussing treatment options, patients should understand that local recurrence following total mastectomy is rare and that this is the procedure of choice for disease that cannot be adequately encompassed with a breast-conserving approach. If the patient and her surgeon are in agreement about proceeding with a breast-conserving approach, there needs to be a clear understanding of the incidence and implications of local recurrence. In all such discussions with newly diagnosed patients, however, it is essential to emphasize the excellent prognosis with this disease, irrespective of the surgical approach.

Esophageal cancer: results of an American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation Study.

BACKGROUND: The last two decades have seen changes in the prevalence, histologic type, and management algorithms for patients with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presentation, stage distribution, and treatment of patients with esophageal cancer using the National Cancer Database of the American College of Surgeons. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutively accessed patients (n = 5,044) with esophageal cancer from 828 hospitals during 1994 were evaluated in 1997 for case mix, diagnostic tests, and treatment modalities. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 67.3 years with a male to female ratio of 3:1; non-Hispanic Caucasians made up most patients. Only 16.6% reported no tobacco use. Dysphagia (74%), weight loss (57.3%), gastrointestinal reflux (20.5%), odynophagia (16.6%), and dyspnea (12.1%) were the most common symptoms. Approximately 50% of patients had the tumor in the lower third of the esophagus. Of all patients, 51.6% had squamous cell histology and 41.9% had adenocarcinoma. Barrett's esophagus occurred in 777 patients, or 39% of those with adenocarcinoma. Of those patients that underwent surgery initially, pathology revealed stage I (13.3%), II (34.7%), III (35.7%), and IV (12.3%) disease. For patients with various stages of squamous cell cancer, radiation therapy plus chemotherapy were the most common treatment modalities (39.5%) compared with surgery plus adjuvant therapy (13.2%). For patients with adenocarcinoma, surgery plus adjuvant therapy were the most common treatment methods. Disease-specific overall survival at 1 year was 43%, ranging from 70% to 18% from stages I to IV. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer of the esophagus shows an increasing occurrence of adenocarcinoma in the lower third of the esophagus and is frequently associated with Barrett's esophagus. Choice of treatment was influenced by tumor histology and tumor site. Multimodality (neoadjuvant) therapy was the most common treatment method for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. The use of multimodality treatment did not appear to increase postoperative morbidity.

National Cancer Data Base survey of breast cancer management for patients from low income zip codes.

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a joint project of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society, is a cancer management and outcomes data base for health care organizations. It provides a comparative summary of patient care that is used by participating hospitals and communities for self-assessment. The most current (1995-1996) breast cancer data on patients from low income zip codes are described here. METHODS: Since 1989, eight Calls for Data have been issued, yielding a total of 191,714 reports of non-Hispanic white patients with breast cancer for the years analyzed, 1995-1996. A total of 1961 hospital cancer registries have participated in at least one of the Calls for Data. RESULTS: A diverse range of breast cancer cases was reported from a variety of geographic locations and medical care environments. There were general similarities in the treatment of patients from the different income groups; however, some differences were reported. Among patients from lower income zip codes, 60.7% were age 60 years or older, compared with 55.1% from other income zip code groups. The AJCC stage distribution was reported as less favorable for patients from low income zip codes than for other patients. The percentage of patients from low income zip codes diagnosed as Stage 0 or I was 51.2%, compared with 55.9% of patients from the other income zip codes. Of patients from lower income zip codes, 12.1% were reported to have Stage III or IV disease, compared with 10.0% of patients from other income zip codes. Patients from low income zip codes received less tissue-sparing surgery. Of patients from low income zip codes, 14.9% received partial mastectomy with or without radiation or systemic therapy, compared with 18.3% of patients from other income zip codes. The percentage of patients from low income zip codes who received a partial mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection was 23.3% for patients from other income zip codes, the percentage was 30.5%. Conversely, 49.8% of patients from lower income zip codes received a modified radical mastectomy, compared with 40.5% of patients from other income zip codes. CONCLUSIONS: Further improvements in the early diagnosis and surgical treatment of low income patients can probably be achieved. Programmatic activities that further explain or reduce the apparent nonpreferred treatment of some low income patients should be encouraged.

Management of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: a national patterns of care study of 17,151 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and axillary irradiation (AI) in patients with breast cancer and to identify the factors influencing them. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Routine performance of ALND in the treatment of breast cancer has become controversial. AI has been proposed as an alternative to ALND, and it has been suggested that AI in addition to ALND may decrease local failure in high-risk patients. METHODS: A joint study was conducted by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American College of Radiology. A total of 17,151 patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated at 819 institutions in 1994 were studied. RESULTS: A total of 15,992 patients underwent ALND (93%). The mean ages of patients who did and did not undergo ALND were 60.4 and 73.0 years. Univariate analysis demonstrated significantly decreased rates of ALND for women age 70 or older (86% vs. 97%), patients with clinical T1 a tumors (81% vs. 93%), grade I histology (90% vs. 95%), and patients with favorable tumor types (88% vs. 94%). The ALND rate did not vary between palpable and nonpalpable tumors. Multivariate analysis of variables affecting the rate of ALND identified type of surgery, age, tumor size, histology, and payer status as significant. A total of 889 patients received AI. Patients not undergoing ALND were more likely to receive AI (10% vs. 5%). A total of 1.6% of patients with no lymph node metastasis underwent AI, 8.9% of those with one to three positive nodes underwent AI, 24.0% of those with four to nine positive lymph nodes underwent AI, and 29.9% of those with > or = 10 positive lymph nodes underwent AI. Multivariate analysis of variables affecting the proportion of patients who received AI and had undergone ALND identified nodal status and type of surgery as significant. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary lymph node dissection continues to be routinely applied in the treatment of breast cancer, and AI remains underused in patients at high risk for local regional relapse.

Factors associated with axillary lymph node metastasis from breast carcinoma: descriptive and predictive analyses.

BACKGROUND: Although axillary lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic determinants of breast carcinoma prognoses, the reasons why tumors vary in their capability to produce for axillary metastases remain unclear. METHODS: The authors used data from the nationwide Patient Care Evaluation (PCE) survey of the American College of Surgeons to evaluate the correlations between patient/tumor characteristics and lymph node status, and to explore the use of these factors, which are all known prior to axillary dissection, in predicting lymph node status. The PCE data set contained 18,025 breast carcinoma cases diagnosed in 1990 after exclusion of women older than 79 years or with fewer than 6 lymph nodes examined. RESULTS: In a multivariate logistic regression model, larger tumor size, young age, African American or Hispanic race, outer half tumor location, poor or moderate differentiation, aneuploidy, and infiltrating ductal histology were independently associated with a higher likelihood of one or more positive lymph nodes. Contrary to expectation, cases negative for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) had a lower risk of positive lymph nodes when adjusted for other factors (odds ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.91) compared with cases positive for both receptors. This model accurately predicted lymph node status in 2 validation data sets (a 50% random sample of 1990 PCE data and 1992 data from the National Cancer Data Base), but was less accurate in a third, older data set (1983 PCE data). However, the percentage of cases (1990 validation set) with predicted probabilities less than 0.05 or greater than 0.95 were only 4.6% and <0.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that 1) most variation in axillary lymph node metastatic status can be explained by routinely available data, 2) ER and PR status may be involved in the mechanism of this behavior, and 3) the difficulty of using prediction models to avert axillary dissection should not be underestimated.

Spectrum of mammographically detected breast cancers.

Mammographic screening of women at both ends of the age spectrum presents a number of challenges. The purpose of this study was to characterize experience with mammographic detection of breast cancer. The two goals were 1) to establish the cancer detection rate of screening mammography and 2) to compare the tumor size of cancers found by mammography, physical examination, or both modalities. From January 1994 through June 1997, data on 609 consecutive female primary breast cancer patients were collected concurrent with definitive surgical therapy. The method of detection was determined by the surgeon, after reviewing mammogram and physical examination. Screening ultrasound was not used. For the 184 patients under 50 years of age, 53 (29%) cancers were detected by mammography only and 48 (26%) by physical examination only. Women under 50 years of age had fewer cancers detected by mammography only (P < 0.001) and more cancers detected by physical examination only (P = 0.0014) than those over 50. With increasing age, the proportion of women with ductal carcinoma in situ decreased (P = 0.004), and the proportion with T1c or T2 tumors increased (P = 0.006). We conclude that 1) when examining women under 50 years of age, the surgeon must be clearly focused on the double-edged sword of screening mammography in this age group, and 2) community cancer programs should encourage annual screening of women over 40 years of age but focus on those over 70, without an arbitrary upper age limit.

Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985-1995, using the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Database is an electronic registry system sponsored jointly by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1985 to 1995 were analyzed for trends in stage of disease, treatment patterns, and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Seven annual requests for data were issued by the National Cancer Database from 1989 through 1995. Data on 100,313 patients were voluntarily submitted using a standardized reporting format. RESULTS: The anatomic site distribution was: head, 78%; body, 11%; and tail, 11%. The ratios of limited to advanced disease (Stage I/Stage IV) were 0.70 for tumors in the head, 0.24 for body tumors, and 0.10 for tail tumors. Of all patients, 83% did not have a surgical procedure and 58% did not have cancer-directed treatment. Resection was done for 9,044 (9%) patients, including 22% of those with Stage I disease. The overall 5-year survival rate was 23.4% for patients who had pancreatectomy, compared with 5.2% for those who had no cancer-directed treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival rates for pancreatic cancer have not changed in 2 decades. A small minority of patients presented with limited, resectable disease, but the best survival rates per stage were achieved after surgical resection. Five-year survival rates after resection reported herein corroborated the improved survival rates of more recent large, single institution studies.

Axillary dissection in breast-conserving surgery for stage I and II breast cancer: a National Cancer Data Base study of patterns of omission and implications for survival.

BACKGROUND: Breast conservation (partial mastectomy, axillary node dissection or sampling, and radiotherapy) is the current standard of care for eligible patients with Stages I and II breast cancer. Because axillary node dissection (AND) has a low yield, some have argued for its omission. The present study was undertaken to determine factors that correlated with omission of AND, and the impact of the decision to omit AND on 10-year relative survival. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data for 547,847 women with Stage I and Stage II breast cancer treated in US hospitals from 1985 to 1995 was undertaken. A subset of 47,944 Stage I and 23,283 Stage II women treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was identified. Cross-tab analysis was used to compare patterns of surgical care within this subset. Relative survival was calculated as the ratio of observed survival to the expected survival for women of the same age and racial/ethnic background. RESULTS: The rate of BCS with and without AND increased steadily from 17.6% and 6.4% of patients from 1985-1989, to 36.6% and 10.6% of patients from 1993-1995 respectively. AND was more likely to be omitted in women with Stage I than women with Stage II disease (14.5% versus 5.5%). Similarly, AND was omitted more frequently in women with Grade 1 than women with higher grades (Grade 1, 14.9%; Grade 2, 10.1%; Grade 3, 7.1%; Grade 4, 7%). Although the rate of BCS with AND varied considerably according to location in the breast, the overall rate of BCS without AND appeared independent of site of lesion. Women over the age of 70 years were more than twice as likely to have AND omitted from BCS than their younger counterparts. Women with lower incomes, women treated in the Northeast, or at hospitals with annual caseloads <150 were all less likely to undergo AND than their corresponding counterparts. Ten-year relative survival for Stage I women treated with partial mastectomy and AND was 85% (n = 1242) versus 66% (n = 1684) for comparable women in whom AND was omitted. BCS with AND followed by radiation therapy for Stage I disease resulted in 94% (n = 5469) 10-year relative survival, compared with 85% (n = 1284) without AND. Addition of both radiation and chemotherapy to BCS with AND for Stage I disease resulted in 86% (n = 2800) versus 58% (n = 512) without AND. In contrast, Stage II women treated with BCS with AND followed by radiation and chemotherapy experienced a 72% 10-year relative survival. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of women with Stage I breast cancer do not undergo AND as part of BCS. The trend is most pronounced for the elderly, but significant fractions of women of all ages are also being undertreated by current standards. Ten-year survival is significantly worse when AND is omitted. This adverse survival effect is not solely from understaging.

Sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer: experience with 180 consecutive patients: efficacy of filtered technetium 99m sulphur colloid with overnight migration time.

BACKGROUND: Axillary node status remains the most important prognostic indicator of survival in breast cancer patients. Only 25% to 35% of patients having standard level I/II axillary dissection have involved nodes, yet all accept the potential for morbidity after the operation. This study was conducted to assess whether status of the sentinel node(s) was an accurate predictor of the presence of metastatic disease in axillary or internal mammary nodes. STUDY DESIGN: In 180 patients, technetium 99m sulphur colloid was injected in a 4-quadrant peritumoral distribution. During the first phase of the study, 72 patients had sentinel node excision followed by a level I/II axillary dissection. During the second phase of the study, 108 patients had sentinel node excision and only those with positive nodes had completion axillary dissection. Nodes were examined after formalin fixation by taking 10 sections at 20-microm intervals and staining with hematoxylin-eosin. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were found in 162 (90%) of 180 patients. The mean number of sentinel nodes examined was 3.1. Of the 162 patients with successful lymphatic mapping, positive sentinel nodes were found in 44 (27%). In 23 (66%) of 35 patients with positive sentinel nodes who had a completion level I/II axillary dissection, the sentinel nodes were the only positive nodes. The concurrent negative predictive value was 4% in the first 72 patients who had completion axillary dissection after sentinel node excision, and 2% for the entire series. With evolution of technique, identification of sentinel nodes with radiolabeled colloid was successful in 97% of the last 100 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Because the concurrent negative predictive value was low, sentinel node excision appeared to accurately identify node status, potentially avoiding the need for standard level I/II axillary dissection in sentinel node-negative patients.

Estrogen replacement therapy and breast cancer: analysis of age of onset and tumor characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The use of exogenous estrogen has been scrutinized as a risk factor for breast cancer formation. This prospective study addresses the relationship between the use of estrogen replacement therapy and the age of onset of breast cancer. In addition, an analysis of differences in pathological features of breast cancer between estrogen users and non-estrogen-users was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 425 women (age, > or = 50 years) were evaluated during a 4-year period (1994-1997). Data, including the age at diagnosis, method of detection, family history, use of estrogen therapy, and tumor ploidy, S-phase fraction, histological category, estrogen receptor positivity, and grade, were prospectively collected. Data from a control group of 657 women without a diagnosis of breast cancer were obtained from the Evanston Northwestern division of the Women's Health Initiative. Significant associations between the use of estrogen and pathological parameters were determined using the chi2 test and t-test (P < .05). RESULTS: At the time of breast cancer diagnosis, 140 patients were currently receiving estrogen and 202 patients had no history of estrogen use. Eighty-three patients were excluded from analysis (76 patients had a history of previous but not current use of estrogen therapy, four women used only progesterone, and three patients provided incomplete information). There was no difference between patients with breast cancer using estrogen at the time of diagnosis and those with no history of estrogen use with respect to tumor size, age of menopause, family history, mammographic sensitivity, axillary lymph node status, and histological features. Women using estrogen at the time of diagnosis were younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, by an average of 5.1 years (61.3 years vs. 66.4 years, P < .001). Women without a history of breast cancer who were receiving estrogen therapy were an average of 2.4 years younger (63.3 years vs. 65.7 years, P < .001) than women without a history of breast cancer who were not receiving estrogen therapy. Patients with breast cancer receiving estrogen also tended to have more grade II tumors (45.9% vs. 36.5%, P = .045) and fewer grade III tumors (25.6% vs. 37.0%, P = .015), compared with women not receiving estrogen therapy at the time of their diagnoses. Estrogen receptor positivity was noted to be more frequent for estrogen users presenting with lobular carcinoma (85% vs. 76%, P = .042) and less frequent for estrogen users presenting with ductal carcinoma (72% vs. 85%, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly earlier age of diagnosis for women receiving estrogen therapy suggests that exogenous estrogen may accelerate the pathogenesis of postmenopausal breast cancer. Estrogen therapy may also play a role in altering the grade and estrogen receptor positivity for certain histological types of breast cancer.

The Society of Surgical Oncology and the Commission on Cancer: progress through synergism.

The 1998 Presidential Address highlights the history of The Society of Surgical Oncology and the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons, cites specific examples of progress through synergism, and discusses some of the many challenges facing surgical oncologists in the future. These include the necessity to synergize in clinical trials, to accelerate the diffusion of knowledge into the practicing community, and to redefine surgical oncology and its relation to general surgery and the American Board of Surgery.

The National Cancer Data Base 10-year survey of breast carcinoma treatment at hospitals in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a joint project of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society, is a cancer management and outcome data base for health care organizations. It provides a comparative summary of patient care that is used by participating hospitals and communities for self-assessment. The most current (1995) data are described herein. METHODS: Since 1989, seven calls for data have been issued, yielding reports on a total of 240,031 breast carcinoma patients for the years included in this analysis. A total of 1849 hospital cancer registries responded to at least 1 of the calls for data. RESULTS: A continuous improvement in care was reported. By 1995, 45.8% (nearly one-half) of breast carcinoma patients were diagnosed early as Stage 0 or I, and early stage patients (Stage 0 or I) were most often treated with partial mastectomy (in 58% of cases). Favorable 10-year relative survival rates for Stage 0 (95%) and Stage I (88%) breast carcinoma patients were reported. Patients who were presumed to be Stage I and were not selected for axillary dissection had poorer survival. Survival differences were reported for different treatment groups within individual stage strata. Over the 10-year observation period, fewer patients from lower-income neighborhoods were diagnosed with early stage breast carcinoma. In general, the annual relative survival rate remained constant over the 10-year observation period (with no plateau after 5 years) within each stage and for all stages combined. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in diagnosis and treatment during the period 1985-1995 were demonstrated by these data. The NCDB breast carcinoma data are appropriate norms for formal quality assurance purposes, such as those specified by the Standards of the Commission on Cancer published by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Cancer committees and other clinicians working within the hospital setting should assess and compare stage distribution, stage specific treatment patterns, and the correlations between the outcomes of patients and both disease stage and treatment.

Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998.

The National Cancer Data Base is a community-oriented cancer management and outcomes database that is the joint project of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. This article provides a first look at highlights from the 1998 summary.

A comparative analysis of lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast: presentation, treatment, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Compared with invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast is considered by many to be a more indistinct and multicentric form of cancer that is detected later and is treated less optimally by breast-preservation techniques. This study analyzed the presentation, treatment trends, and survival rates of women who had invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. The objective was to determine the utility of breast-preservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma by analysis of historic data on tumor features and survival. STUDY DESIGN: Data on 291,273 women diagnosed with invasive carcinoma between 1985 and 1993 were obtained from the National Cancer Data Base. Analysis included the patient's age at diagnosis; tumor histology, anatomic site, diameter, grade, and stage; treatment; and disease status 5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: The mean patient age at diagnosis was 61.0 years for invasive ductal carcinoma, 63.0 years for invasive lobular carcinoma, and 60.6 years for tumors with combined histology. The anatomic location, tumor diameter, and tumor grade were similar for each histotype. Breast-preservation therapy was less frequent for invasive lobular carcinoma. The 5-year overall survival and local disease-free survival rates for women treated with breast preservation were similar for invasive ductal carcinoma (84% overall survival; 97% disease-free survival) and invasive lobular carcinoma (87% overall survival; 98% disease-free survival). CONCLUSIONS: Invasive lobular carcinoma presents with a similar age distribution, anatomic subsite, diameter, and grade as invasive ductal carcinoma. Breast preservation is selected less commonly for women who have invasive lobular carcinoma, but this choice of therapy does not compromise the disease-free or overall survival status of this group of patients.