Enhancing Your Webside Manner: Optimizing Opportunities for Relationship-Centered Care in Virtual Visits.

In the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019, virtual visits have become the primary means of delivering efficient, high-quality, and safe health care while Americans are instructed to stay at home until the rapid transmission of the virus abates. An important variable in the quality of any patient-clinician interaction, including virtual visits, is how adroit the clinician is at forming a relationship. This article offers a review of the research that exists on forming a relationship in a virtual visit and the outcomes of a quality improvement project which resulted in the refinement of a "Communication Tip Sheet" that can be used with virtual visits. It also offers several communication strategies predicated on the R.E.D.E. to Communicate model that can be used when providing care virtually.

Physician Empathy Is Not Associated with Laboratory Outcomes in Diabetes: a Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: One widely cited study suggested a link between physician empathy and laboratory outcomes in patients with diabetes, but its findings have not been replicated. While empathy has a positive impact on patient experience, its impact on other outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between physician empathy and glycosylated hemoglobin (HgbA1c) as well as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels in patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with diabetes who received care at a large integrated health system in the USA between January 1, 2011, and May 31, 2014, and their primary care physicians. MAIN MEASURES: The main independent measure was physician empathy, as measured by the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE). The JSE is scored on a scale of 20-140, with higher scores indicating greater empathy. Dependent measures included patient HgbA1c and LDL. Mixed-effects linear regression models adjusting for patient sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity index, and physician characteristics were used to assess the association between physician JSE scores and their patients' HgbA1c and LDL. KEY RESULTS: The sample included 4176 primary care patients who received care with one of 51 primary care physicians. Mean physician JSE score was 118.4 (standard deviation (SD) = 12). Median patient HgbA1c was 6.7% (interquartile range (IQR) = 6.2-7.5) and median LDL concentration was 83 (IQR = 66-104). In adjusted analyses, there was no association between JSE scores and HgbA1c (ß = - 0.01, 95%CI = - 0.04, 0.02, p = 0.47) or LDL (ß = 0.41, 95%CI = - 0.47, 1.29, p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Physician empathy was not associated with HgbA1c or LDL. While interventions to increase physician empathy may result in more patient-centered care, they may not improve clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes.

Do HCAHPS Doctor Communication Scores Reflect the Communication Skills of the Attending on Record? A Cautionary Tale from a Tertiary-Care Medical Service.

BACKGROUND: Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores measure patient satisfaction with hospital care. It is not known if these reflect the communication skills of the attending physician on record. The Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS) is a validated instrument that measures bedside physician communication skills according to 4 habits, namely: investing in the beginning, eliciting the patient's perspective, demonstrating empathy, and investing in the end. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the 4HCS correlates with provider HCAHPS scores. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, consenting hospitalist physicians (n = 28), were observed on inpatient rounds during 3 separate encounters. We compared hospitalists' 4HCS scores with their doctor communication HCAHPS scores to assess the degree to which these correlated with inpatient physician communication skills. We performed sensitivity analysis excluding scores returned by patients cared for by more than 1 hospitalist. RESULTS: A total of 1003 HCAHPS survey responses were available. Pearson correlation between 4HCS and doctor communication scores was not significant, at 0.098 (-0.285, 0.455; P = 0.619). Also, no significant correlations were found between each habit and HCAHPS. When including only scores attributable to 1 hospitalist, Pearson correlation between the empathy habit and the HCAHPS respect score was 0.515 (0.176, 0.745; P = 0.005). Between empathy and overall doctor communication, it was 0.442 (0.082, 0.7; P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Attending-of-record HCAHPS scores do not correlate with 4HCS. After excluding patients cared for by more than 1 hospitalist, demonstrating empathy did correlate with the doctor communication and respect HCAHPS scores. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:421-427.

Associations Between Physician Empathy, Physician Characteristics, and Standardized Measures of Patient Experience.

PURPOSE: To identify correlates of physician empathy and determine whether physician empathy is related to standardized measures of patient experience. METHOD: Demographic, professional, and empathy data were collected during 2013-2015 from Cleveland Clinic Health System physicians prior to participation in mandatory communication skills training. Empathy was assessed using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy. Data were also collected for seven measures (six provider communication items and overall provider rating) from the visit-specific and 12-month Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) surveys. Associations between empathy and provider characteristics were assessed by linear regression, ANOVA, or a nonparametric equivalent. Significant predictors were included in a multivariable linear regression model. Correlations between empathy and CG-CAHPS scores were assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: In bivariable analysis (n = 847 physicians), female sex (P < .001), specialty (P < .01), outpatient practice setting (P < .05), and DO degree (P < .05) were associated with higher empathy scores. In multivariable analysis, female sex (P < .001) and four specialties (obstetrics-gynecology, pediatrics, psychiatry, and thoracic surgery; all P < .05) were significantly associated with higher empathy scores. Of the seven CG-CAHPS measures, scores on five for the 583 physicians with visit-specific data and on three for the 277 physicians with 12-month data were positively correlated with empathy. CONCLUSIONS: Specialty and sex were independently associated with physician empathy. Empathy was correlated with higher scores on multiple CG-CAHPS items, suggesting improving physician empathy might play a role in improving patient experience.

Communication Skills Training for Physicians Improves Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Skilled physician communication is a key component of patient experience. Large-scale studies of exposure to communication skills training and its impact on patient satisfaction have not been conducted. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the impact of experiential relationship-centered physician communication skills training on patient satisfaction and physician experience. DESIGN: This was an observational study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a large, multispecialty academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 1537 attending physicians who participated in, and 1951 physicians who did not participate in, communication skills training between 1 August 2013 and 30 April 2014. INTERVENTION: An 8-h block of interactive didactics, live or video skill demonstrations, and small group and large group skills practice sessions using a relationship-centered model. MAIN MEASURES: Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CGCAHPS), Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), self-efficacy, and post course satisfaction. KEY RESULTS: Following the course, adjusted overall CGCAHPS scores for physician communication were higher for intervention physicians than for controls (92.09 vs. 91.09, p < 0.03). No significant interactions were noted between physician specialty or baseline CGCAHPS and improvement following the course. Significant improvement in the post-course HCAHPS Respect domain adjusted mean was seen in intervention versus control groups (91.08 vs. 88.79, p = 0.02) and smaller, non-statistically significant improvements were also seen for adjusted HCAHPS communication scores (83.95 vs. 82.73, p = 0.22). Physicians reported high course satisfaction and showed significant improvement in empathy (116.4 ± 12.7 vs. 124 ± 11.9, p < 0.001) and burnout, including all measures of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Less depersonalization and greater personal accomplishment were sustained for at least 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: System-wide relationship-centered communication skills training improved patient satisfaction scores, improved physician empathy, self-efficacy, and reduced physician burnout. Further research is necessary to examine longer-term sustainability of such interventions.

The REDE Model of Healthcare Communication: Optimizing Relationship as a Therapeutic Agent.

The REDE model is a conceptual framework for teaching relationship-centered healthcare communication. Based on the premise that genuine relationships are a vital therapeutic agent, use of the framework has the potential to positively influence both patient and provider. The REDE model applies effective communication skills to optimize personal connections in three primary phases of Relationship: Establishment, Development and Engagement (REDE). This paper describes the REDE model and its application to a typical provider-patient interaction.

Use of the MMPI-2-RF suicidal/death ideation and substance abuse scales in screening bariatric surgery candidates.

Bariatric surgery patients are at increased risk for suicide and lifetime substance abuse problems, and these risks are surgical contraindications. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) has scales to screen for these risks factors, among others. We seek to evaluate the classification accuracy of the MMPI-2-RF Suicidal/Death Ideation (SUI) and Substance Abuse (SUB) scales to optimize their use in bariatric surgery settings. Data were collected from 1,311 (72.1% female; 65.5% Caucasian) bariatric surgery candidates from the Cleveland Clinic as well as 295 (94.1% female; 85.9% Caucasian) bariatric surgery candidates from a private practice in St. Paul, Minnesota. Classification accuracies were calculated at original and revised SUI and SUB interpretative cutoffs in the Cleveland Clinic sample and replicated in the St. Paul sample. Significant and meaningful classification accuracy gains were demonstrated by excluding a death ideation item from the SUI scale and lowering the interpretive cutoff on the SUB scale. Practical implications and study limitations are discussed.

Assessing psychosocial functioning of bariatric surgery candidates with the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF).

BACKGROUND: Psychological comorbidity is common in bariatric surgery candidates. Many multidisciplinary teams incorporate psychometric testing to screen for psychological factors that, if left unattended, may negatively impact surgical results. Here, we report descriptive findings and empirical correlates of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales among of bariatric surgery candidates undergoing a pre-surgical psychological evaluation. METHODS: The sample consisted of male (n = 324) and female (n = 658) patients seeking bariatric surgery who were administered the MMPI-2-RF at their psychological evaluation. Psychosocial and medical variables were retrospectively coded from the patients' medical records. These criteria included history/current mental health diagnoses and treatments, maladaptive eating behaviors/diagnoses, past/current substance use, abuse history, sleep apnea, and denial of surgery. RESULTS: Descriptive analyses demonstrated similar findings for male and female candidates and replicated previous reports. MMPI-2-RF scales measuring emotional dysfunction were associated with maladaptive eating patterns, a history of Major Depressive Disorder, and previous suicide attempts. Scale scores measuring behavioral dysfunction were associated with current/past substance use and previous physical abuse. MMPI-2-RF scale scores measuring somatic problems were associated with a higher BMI at the time of surgery, sleep apnea diagnosis/adherence, physical/sexual abuse history, active mood disorder, previous mental health diagnoses, and maladaptive eating patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The MMPI-2-RF can aid in identifying a broad range of psychological comorbidity among bariatric surgery candidates. When used in conjunction with a pre-surgical psychological interview, it can aid in the assessment of psychological factors relevant to pre-surgical psychological assessment of bariatric surgery candidates.

Pilot evaluation of a substance abuse prevention group intervention for at-risk bariatric surgery candidates.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about an increased incidence of substance abuse after bariatric surgery. Alcohol use after surgery may be particularly problematic because of changes in pharmacokinetics leading to greater intoxication. The present study evaluated a substance abuse prevention group pilot intervention for at-risk bariatric surgery candidates. METHODS: Patients with a history of substance abuse/dependence or at-risk substance use applying for weight loss surgery (WLS; N = 86) were referred to a single-session 90-minute intervention (67.4% female; 65.1% Caucasian; mean age 46.2 years; mean body mass index 48.77 kg/m(2)). The session included education about the health effects of alcohol/substances on WLS outcomes, developing alternative coping strategies, identifying warning signs of misuse, and providing treatment resources. Patients completed a preintervention and postintervention questionnaire measuring knowledge of substance use health effects, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Items, and items on motivation for abstinence. RESULTS: Patients reported a significant increase in knowledge regarding the negative effects of substance abuse after surgery (t = 42.34; P<.001). Patients also reported more healthy alternative coping strategies after the intervention (t = 18.96; P<.001). In addition, a significant number of patients reported a lower intention of consuming alcohol after surgery (χ(2) = 16.18; P<.001) and were more likely to report health reasons as motivation to abstain (χ(2) = 102.89; P< .001). CONCLUSIONS: At-risk patients applying for weight loss surgery may benefit from a substance abuse prevention intervention. More research will be needed to see if such benefits can be sustained over time and if interventions affect postsurgical behaviors.

Psychological risk may influence drop-out prior to bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Factors necessitating a delay before psychological clearance for bariatric surgery have been previously identified; however, research has not examined why patients who begin the preoperative evaluation fail to complete surgery or drop-out of bariatric programs. This study sought to explore the potential psychosocial reasons for a failure to reach bariatric surgery. The setting was an academic medical center. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 129 patients psychologically evaluated for bariatric surgery who had failed to reach surgery after 15 months. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, body mass index, and psychiatric variables. RESULTS: The most common reasons for not reaching surgery included withdrawal from the program, outstanding program requirements, self-canceled surgery, moving out of the area, insurance denial, switching to non-surgical weight management, or death. Patients with outstanding program requirements were psychosocially different from patients who had not achieved surgery for other reasons. They were significantly more likely to be involved in outpatient behavioral health treatment (chi-square = 12.90, P < .05), to be taking psychotropic medications (chi-square = 15.17, P < .05), and to have met the criteria for current or past alcohol abuse/dependence (chi-square = 23.70, P < .01), and there was a trend for previous inpatient hospitalizations (chi-square = 11.59, P < .07). CONCLUSION: Patients who failed to complete outstanding program requirements often had significant psychiatric and/or substance abuse/dependence issues that required additional treatment. It is possible that these patients drop-out of the program due to unwillingness to complete psychiatric treatment recommendations. Continued screening of high-risk patients and the education of patients on the importance of managing these risks is indicated. However, patients may choose to leave programs once education has been provided or treatment mandated.

Psychosocial correlates of pelvic floor disorders in women seeking bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Women who struggle with obesity are at a significant risk for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), defined as urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and/or fecal incontinence. The association between PFDs and reduced quality of life has been demonstrated; however, the psychosocial correlates of PFDs in women undergoing bariatric surgery have yet to be examined. The present study explored the potential psychosocial correlates of PFD. The setting was an academic medical center. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 421 female patients evaluated for bariatric surgery. Based upon a screening questionnaire, participants were dichotomized as women with PFDs (n = 121) and women without PFDs (n = 300). Patients completed the "Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, 2nd ed., Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF)," and medical records were reviewed for demographic data, body mass index, substance abuse/dependence history, history of physical and/or sexual abuse, psychiatric medication usage, and psychiatric diagnoses. MMPI-2-RF scales measuring depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, and social support were examined. RESULTS: Women with PFDs were significantly older (F(1,420) = 3.87, P < .05) and more likely to evidence a history of substance abuse/dependence (chi-square = 4.53, P < .05) and depression (chi-square = 4.31, P < .05) than women without PFDs. There also was a trend for previous inpatient hospitalization (chi-square = 2.93, P < .09), outpatient behavioral health treatment (chi-square = 2.89, P < .09), and psychotropic medication usage (chi-square = 3.32, P < .07). No differences were found in the objective psychological testing. CONCLUSION: Women with PFDs may be more psychiatrically vulnerable than other bariatric surgery candidates. Additional research on the association among PFDs, substance abuse, and depression is warranted. Future research should consider whether this potential relationship changes postoperative bariatric surgery.

Older bariatric surgery candidates: is there greater psychological risk than for young and midlife candidates?

BACKGROUND: Although severe obesity is dramatically increasing in older adults, many bariatric programs use age cutoffs due to concerns about greater perioperative morbidity and mortality risks. More recently, surgical outcomes have been reported in older adults. However, a paucity of data is available on the psychological risks of older bariatric candidates. Our objective is to examine psychiatric risk factors and weight loss outcomes in older (≥65 yr) versus midlife (40-55 yr) versus young adult (18-29 yr) patients. METHODS: Older, midlife, and young adults (n = 608) who underwent weight loss surgery (74.6% women, 75.6% white, mean body mass index 48.07 ± 9.61 kg/m2) at the Cleveland Clinic Bariatric and Metabolic Institute completed a psychiatric diagnostic interview, and the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2-restructured form, binge eating scale, and Cleveland Clinic behavioral rating scale before surgery. The data gathered from follow-up visits and weight loss outcomes at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after surgery were measured. RESULTS: Young adults had a greater reduction in excess body mass index than those at midlife in the first 6 months but no age differences were noted in the following year. Older patients were less likely to have a suicide history but the groups were equivalent on other psychiatric variables and self-report measures. Psychologist evaluators rated older adults less favorably on the capacity to consent and realistic nature of expectations. CONCLUSION: Although medical risks may cause concern, older adults do not demonstrate any increased psychological risk factors compared with midlife or young adult surgical candidates and evidenced equivalent weight loss. However, concerns with lower ratings on consent and expectations warrant additional research.

Weighing the evidence for an association between obesity and suicide risk.

Chronic illness is an important risk factor for suicidal behavior. Obesity is perhaps the most prevalent chronic disease at present, although the contribution of obesity to fatal and nonfatal suicide is controversial. Several large population-based studies have shown that obesity is independently linked to an increased risk of suicide. However, this association has been challenged by reports demonstrating a paradoxical relationship between an increasing body mass index and suicide. Recently, it has also been suggested that bariatric surgery patients are at increased risk of death by suicide postoperatively. We reviewed the heterogeneous data concerning the relationship between obesity and suicide. We also critically examined recent reports describing the incidence of fatal suicide events after bariatric surgery. From the present review, it appears that a positive association between obesity and suicide has been observed more frequently than a negative or absent association. This implies that obese individuals are indeed at an increased risk of suicide. This risk seems to persist despite treatment of obesity with bariatric surgery.

Positive response to binge eating intervention enhances postoperative weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Binge eating disorder has been suggested as a predictor of negative outcomes, including weight regain and poorer weight loss, particularly if the symptoms (e.g., loss of control eating) remain after surgery. Binge eating disorder has been viewed by some as a contraindication for weight loss surgery, and preoperative treatment has been recommended to help reduce binge eating behaviors. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether the response to a preoperative binge eating intervention related to differential postoperative weight loss at an academic medical center. METHODS: A total of 128 bariatric surgery candidates completed a brief cognitive behavioral group treatment for binge eating behaviors. The patients were categorized as positive responders or nonresponders according to the postintervention outcomes, including binge eating symptoms and episodes. The percentage of excess body weight loss (%EBWL) was measured at 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Across all bariatric procedures, the positive responders to the brief binge eating intervention had lost significantly more weight at 6 months (46% EBWL versus 38% EBWL) and 12 months (59% EBWL versus 50% EBWL) postoperatively. The results for a subsample of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients (n = 89) were also significant, with 53% EBWL for the responders and 42% EBWL for the nonresponders at 6 months and 68% EBWL versus 54% EBWL at 12 months postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSION: The response to binge eating treatment could be an important predictor of postoperative weight loss. The results from the present study provide support for patients who respond to preoperative binge eating treatment having enhanced surgical outcomes.

Prevalence and psychosocial correlates of self-reported past suicide attempts among bariatric surgery candidates.

BACKGROUND: Although research has been limited, suicidal behavior has commonly been identified as a contraindication for bariatric surgery. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of past suicide attempts in a bariatric surgery population at an academic medical center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review, including the demographic and psychosocial variables, was conducted of 1020 consecutive bariatric surgery candidates presenting during a 32-month period. RESULTS: Of the 1020 patients, 115 (11.2%) self-reported ≥ 1 previous suicide attempt. The patients with a positive suicide history were significantly younger (mean 42.9 ± 11.0 years), less educated (mean 13.4 ± 2.4 years), had a greater body mass index (mean 52.3 ± 11.6 kg/m(2)), and were more predominantly single (32.2% versus 20.9%), female (90.4% versus 74.8%), and receiving disability (45.2% versus 21.8%) compared with patients without a suicide history. A positive suicide history was also significantly associated with a history of psychiatric hospitalization, outpatient psychotherapy and/or psychotropic medication, sexual abuse, and substance abuse. CONCLUSION: Assessing suicide history is an important aspect of the bariatric preoperative assessment. Additional research is needed to evaluate the effects of suicide history on the postoperative outcomes and adherence.

Internal consistency and validity assessment of SCL-90-R for bariatric surgery candidates.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative bariatric psychological evaluations often use both a clinical interview and psychometric testing. Given concerns regarding the psychometric properties of some measures, the present study explored the internal consistency reliability and validity of the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised (SCL-90-R) and has provided a preliminary set of norms for the instrument within a bariatric population. Although the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery has included the SCL-90-R as a suggested measure for the assessment of personality and psychopathology, no known studies have reported on the reliability or validity of the SCL-90-R within bariatric samples. METHODS: The present study was completed at a large Midwestern medical center in the United States. SCL-90-R inventories were completed by 322 preoperative bariatric patients as a part of their psychological evaluation. Most patients were women (75.5%), with a mean age of 46.7 ± 10.8 years and a mean body mass index of 50.4 ± 10.9 kg/m(2). RESULTS: The internal consistency coefficients for the 9 subscales were .76-.90. Convergent validity was demonstrated by scale correlations with the data gathered in the clinical interview. CONCLUSION: Compared with other recently studied measures, including the Millon Behavioral Medicine Diagnostic, the SCL-90-R demonstrated good internal consistency and preliminary validity data for bariatric patients. Providers might want to consider the SCL-90-R as a screening measure for bariatric surgery patients.

Mood disorders in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients: does it affect early weight loss?

BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients with a lifetime history of a mood disorder have a lower percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) compared with patients without this lifetime history. No studies have examined the effect of psychiatric history on postoperative outcomes among laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) patients. The objectives of the present study were to determine whether mood disorders relate to the first year of weight loss for patients undergoing LSG at an academic medical center. METHODS: A total of 104 patients (78.6% white and 71.2% women), with a median body mass index of 60.35 kg/m(2) (range 31.37-129.14) underwent LSG. The patients were prospectively followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The semistructured preoperative psychiatric evaluations demonstrated that 43.1% had a current, and 62.5% a lifetime, diagnosis of a mood disorder. RESULTS: LSG patients with current mood disorders had a significantly lower %EWL than patients without a psychiatric diagnosis at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up visits. LSG patients with a lifetime history of a mood disorder had a significantly lower %EWL than patients without psychiatric diagnosis at the 1-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up examinations. However, after removing patients with bipolar disorder from the analyses, no significant differences were found in the %EWL between patients with and without a lifetime history of depressive disorders. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass findings, a lifetime history of mood disorders appears to be associated with significantly less weight loss in LSG patients. These findings highlight the importance of the psychiatric assessment in bariatric patients. Additionally, patients with a current or lifetime history of mood disorders might need additional pre- and postoperative care to improve their outcomes.

Moving beyond dichotomous psychological evaluation: the Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System for weight loss surgery.

BACKGROUND: Most bariatric programs require a preoperative psychological evaluation. The criteria for such decision-making and acceptance rates have been well described in published reports. Most programs have made categorical distinctions of accept, reject, or delay, although this limits utility. METHODS: Bariatric surgery candidates (n = 389; 77.1% women; 74.3% white; mean +/- SD BMI 49.84 +/- 11.51 kg/m(2)) were evaluated using the CCBRS across 8 domains of interest in the psychological bariatric literature. Each domain was graded using a 5-point scale (poor, guarded, fair, good, excellent). A summary assessment was also given. The in-patient length of stay and preoperative, 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month BMI changes were assessed in the subset (n = 241) who had undergone surgery. RESULTS: The CCBRS had excellent internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha = .88) and good consistency across providers (test-retest for overall determination r = .82). Most candidates were deemed acceptable, but 25.7% were initially considered guarded or poor candidates. Only 2.6% of the sample was unable to achieve the goals to improve their candidacy and undergo surgery. Hierarchical regression analyses on the overall CCBRS score demonstrated that unemployment, less education, greater BMI, smoking, and psychiatric medication use were associated with lower assessment scores. Guarded candidates spent significantly longer in the hospital and fair candidates had less preoperative BMI change than guarded or good candidates, although no significant postoperative BMI changes were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that the CCBRS is an internally consistent and useful tool for multidimensional psychological assessment of preoperative bariatric candidates.