Artificial Intelligence Autonomously Measures Cup Orientation, Corrects for Pelvis Orientation, and Identifies Retroversion From Antero-Posterior Pelvis Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Measuring cup orientation is time consuming and inaccurate, but orientation influences the risk of impingement and dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study designed an artificial intelligence (AI) program to autonomously determine cup orientation, correct for pelvis orientation, and identify cup retroversion from an antero-posterior pelvic radiographs. METHODS: There were 2,945 patients between 2012 and 2019 identified to have 504 computed tomographic (CT) scans of their THA. A 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was performed on all CTs, where cup orientation was measured relative to the anterior pelvic plane. Patients were randomly allocated to training (4,000 x-rays), validation (511 x-rays), and testing (690 x-rays) groups. Data augmentation was applied to the training set (n = 4,000,000) to increase model robustness. Statistical analyses were performed only on the test group in their accuracy with CT measurements. RESULTS: AI predictions averaged 0.22 ± 0.03 seconds to run on a given radiograph. Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.976 and 0.984 for AI measurements with CT, while hand measurements were 0.650 and 0.687 for anteversion and inclination, respectively. The AI measurements more closely represented CT scans when compared to hand measurements (P < .001). Measurements averaged 0.04 ± 2.21°, 0.14 ± 1.66°, -0.31 ± 8.35°, and 6.48° ± 7.43° from CT measurements for AI anteversion, AI inclination, hand anteversion, and hand inclination, respectively. AI predictions identified 17 radiographs as retroverted with 100.0% accuracy (total retroverted, n = 45). CONCLUSION: The AI algorithms may correct for pelvis orientation when measuring cup orientation on radiographs, outperform hand measurements, and may be implemented in a timely fashion. This is the first method to identify a retroverted cup from a single AP radiograph.

Effective Mentorship of Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Investigation.

Orthopaedic surgery is currently the least diverse medical specialty, and there is little research on the mentorship needs for women and underrepresented minorities (URMs) in orthopaedics. The purpose of this study was to examine the roles and functions of mentorship for women and URMs in orthopaedic surgery, to understand mentorship preferences, and to elucidate barriers to mentorship in orthopaedic surgery. Methods: Members of J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society and Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society were invited to participate. An email with an anonymous link to the survey was distributed; the survey was open for responses from September 2020 through February 2021. The survey contained free-response and quantitative items about mentorship and its impact on current activities, career path, and ways to improve mentorship. Descriptive statistics, 1-way analysis of variance, frequencies, and Fisher exact test were used to analyze survey data. Qualitative data were deidentified and analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. Results: A total of 155 participants responded to the survey, of those, 151 (98%) met criteria for analysis. Sixty-four percent of participants were women, 15% identified as Black, 4% identified as Hispanic, and 9% identified as multiracial. Eighty-five percent of respondents had a mentor in orthopaedic surgery. Mentorship was often cited as useful for exposure to role models and skills development. Medical students were most likely to consider gender concordance with their mentor important. URM respondents reported greater importance of sharing race/ethnicity with their mentor (p = 0.005). In qualitative responses, participants commented on identity-specific challenges to mentorship, lack of time and institutional support for mentorship, and the disproportionate burden of mentorship on women and URMs. Conclusions: Mentorship was highly valued among women and URMs in orthopaedic surgery across all career stages. Mentorship attracted students to orthopaedic surgery and allowed residents and surgeons to progress in the field. Sharing racial/ethnic identity in mentor-mentee relationships was important to both trainees and practicing surgeons.