Use of antidepressants and benzodiazepine-related hypnotics before and after initiation of TNF-α inhibitors or non-biological systemic treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are autoimmune disorders associated with an increased risk for depression, anxiety and sleeping problems. The objective of this study was to analyze use of antidepressants and benzodiazepine-related hypnotics (BRH) in Sweden before and after first time treatment with anti-TNF and non-biological systemic (NBS) treatments among patients with the above diagnoses, and to correlate such use with that of randomly selected population controls. METHODS: Patients and dispensed drugs were identified in nationwide Swedish healthcare registers. Proportions of subjects filling prescriptions of antidepressants and BRH from 2 years before start of treatment (index-date), and 2 years after index date were assessed. Using the period -6 months to index-date as reference, prevalence rate ratios were computed for 6 months' intervals before and after index. For up to ten randomly selected population controls per patient, the same measures were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 6256 patients started anti-TNF treatment, and 13,241 NBS treatment. The mean age at index was 52.0 for the anti-TNF group and 56.1 for NBS. Use of antidepressants and BRH was similar in both treatment groups (10.4-12.8%), significantly more common than in the controls (6.6 to 7.6%). For all patients, proportions filling prescriptions for antidepressants and BRH decreased directly or soon after the index; no such changes were seen in the controls, who all showed a slow but steady increase in use over time. Starters of anti-TNF treatment did not show clearer decreases in use of psychotropics than those initiating NBS. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased rates of dispensed psychotropic drugs after the time of anti-TNF and NBS treatment initiation were seen among patients with autoimmune disorders but not population controls. This may correspond to treatment effects of anti-TNF and NBS also on psychiatric symptoms among these patients.

Monotherapy vs. combination therapy for post mania maintenance treatment: A population based cohort study.

In recent years, the use of atypical antipsychotics and combination therapy for relapse prevention in bipolar disorder has increased substantially. However, real-world data on the comparative effectiveness of these treatment options are largely non-existent. We conducted a population-based cohort study, using data from Swedish national registers. All patients aged 18-75 years who were hospitalized for mania 2006-2014 and filled at least one prescription of lithium, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole or any combination of these drugs were included, and followed for up to one year after hospital discharge, generating follow-up data from 5 713 hospitalizations. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to study time to treatment failure for each individual drug and combination therapy, using lithium as comparator. Treatment failure was defined as treatment discontinuation, switch, or rehospitalization, and the results were adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic factors. We found that treatment failure occurred in 85% of cases and that the majority of combination therapies were associated with lower risks of treatment failure compared to monotherapies. Patients combining lithium + valproate + quetiapine had the lowest risk of treatment failure (adjusted HR [AHR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.54), followed by patients on lithium + valproate + olanzapine (AHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.68). In contrast, monotherapies with antipsychotics were associated with significantly higher risks of treatment failure compared to single use of lithium. In conclusion, our results support experimental findings, suggesting that combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy after a manic episode.

Mortality in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: A register-based cohort study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The impact of treatment resistant depression (TRD) on mortality is not established. METHODS: Using Swedish national registers, 118,774 patients between 18-69 years of age who had been prescribed an antidepressant and been diagnosed with depression in specialized care were identified. Patients with at least two additional treatment trials during the same depressive episode were classified as having TRD. Data on the covariates of sex, age, history of depression, self-harm, substance use disorders, and other psychiatric and somatic comorbidities was also used. Relative risks comparing TRD patients with other depressed patients were calculated as hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality and for external and non-external causes of death, as well as excess mortality rate ratios (EMRR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: In total 15,013 patients (13%) were classified with TRD. Adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was 1.35 (95% CI 1.21-1.50). Mortality from external causes (including suicides and accidents) was markedly higher in TRD patients than in other depressed patients (HR 1.97; 1.69-2.29), while mortality from non-external causes was similar. The adjusted EMRR was 1.52 (1.31-1.76), highest among patients 18-29 years old (EMRR 2.03; 1.31-1.76) and patients without somatic comorbidity (EMRR 1.99; 1.63-2.43). LIMITATIONS: Severity of depression and adherence to treatment were not available in the data. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TRD may have an increased all-cause mortality compared to other depressed patients, mainly for external causes of death. The relative mortality is highest among young and physically healthy patients.

Initiation and long-term use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Increasing evidence points to the harmful effects of long-term benzodiazepine treatment. Our objective was to study the incidence of, and predictors for, long-term use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in bipolar disorder. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study, using data from Swedish national registers. Swedish residents aged 18-75 years with a recorded diagnosis of bipolar disorder or mania between July 2006 and December 2012, and no history of benzodiazepine/Z-drug use in the past year, were included. Patients were followed for 1 year with regard to prescription fills of benzodiazepines/Z-drugs. Initiators were followed for another year during which continuous use for >6 months was defined as "long-term". Patient and prescription characteristics were investigated as potential predictors for long-term use in multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Out of the 21 883 patients included, 29% started benzodiazepine/Z-drug treatment, of whom one in five became long-term users. Patients who were prescribed clonazepam or alprazolam had high odds for subsequent long-term use (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] 3.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.24-6.38] and 2.03 [95% CI 1.30-3.18], respectively), compared to those prescribed diazepam. Polytherapy with benzodiazepines/Z-drugs also predicted long-term use (aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.79-3.38), as did age ≥60 years (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.46-2.53, compared to age <30 years), and concomitant treatment with psychostimulants (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.33-2.39). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of subsequent long-term use among bipolar benzodiazepine initiators is high. Patients on clonazepam, alprazolam or benzodiazepine/Z-drug polytherapy have the highest risk of becoming long-term users, suggesting that these treatments should be used restrictively.

Reducing the rehospitalization risk after a manic episode: A population based cohort study of lithium, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine and aripiprazole in monotherapy and combinations.

BACKGROUND: Data on real-world rehospitalization risks in patients using different drugs and combination therapies for relapse prevention after a manic episode is limited. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population based cohort study using data from Swedish national registers. Swedish residents aged 18-75 years who were hospitalized for a manic episode between July 1, 2006 and December 2, 2014 were included. Prescription fills of lithium, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine and aripiprazole were recorded throughout the first four weeks after hospital discharge, after which the patients were followed for up to one year. General and treatment specific rehospitalization risks were determined and results were adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: The study included follow-up data from 6 502 hospitalizations for mania. Pharmacologic relapse prevention was used after 78% of these hospitalizations. Monotherapies and combination therapies were equally common. The average one-year rehospitalization risk for patients who did versus did not initiate prophylactic treatment was 39% and 46%, respectively. The lowest rehospitalization risks were seen in patients on combination therapy with olanzapine and valproate or olanzapine and lithium, experiencing one year rehospitalization risks of 32% and 34% (adjusted hazard ratios 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.93) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.70-0.98), compared to lithium monotherapy). LIMITATIONS: Register data does not provide information on all clinical parameters affecting treatment choices. CONCLUSIONS: One-year rehospitalization rates after a manic episode are considerable also for patients who initiate prophylactic treatment. Combination therapies including olanzapine and a classic mood-stabilizer may be beneficial for reducing rehospitalization risks after a manic episode.

Risk of breast cancer in risperidone users: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Several antipsychotics, especially risperidone, are known to increase serum prolactin. Hyperprolactinemia has been linked to the development of mammary gland tumors in animal studies. We therefore investigated the risk of breast cancer in a nationwide cohort of women using risperidone or other antipsychotics. METHODS: All women, 18years or older, who initiated treatment with risperidone or any other antipsychotic between 2006 and 2012 were identified in Swedish nationwide registers. Patients with two consecutive dispensations of the same antipsychotic within 3months, no previous cancer diagnosis, and no previous dispensations of paliperidone were included. The final cohort consisted of 55976 women of whom 22908, 24524, and 8544 were exposed to risperidone, other atypical antipsychotics, and typical antipsychotics, respectively. A Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between antipsychotics and breast cancer. RESULTS: Patients were followed prospectively, the mean follow-up time ranging from 2.4 to 2.8years between treatment groups. After adjusting for age, there was no increased risk for breast cancer among risperidone users compared to patients exposed to another atypical antipsychotic (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72-1.22) or a typical antipsychotic (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.94-1.66). Analyses stratified by tumor stage, using active treatment follow-up time, or including only treatment naïve patients did not reveal any noteworthy change in the results. CONCLUSION: Risperidone use does not confer an increased short-term risk of breast cancer compared to other antipsychotic agents.