Deep vein thrombosis assessment clinic: Evaluation of a new working practice.

Suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common reason for medical referral to hospital. We evaluated our new approach to assessment of DVT using combined automated strain gauge plethysmography and pretest probability score in comparison with venous ultrasonography in 100 consecutive patients with suspected DVT referred to the nurse-led clinic. The combined plethysmography and pretest probability score produced a negative predictive value of 99%, positive predictive value 53%, sensitivity 94% and specificity 83% for detection of a DVT. We conclude that our new working practice for DVT assessment is both safe and cost effective and can lead to a reduction in venous ultrasonography of approximately 70%.

Management of patients treated with aspirin or warfarin and evaluation of haemostasis prior to prostatic biopsy: a survey of current practice amongst radiologists and urologists.

AIM: To document current practice concerning the management of patients taking aspirin or warfarin and the evaluation of haemostatic function prior to prostatic biopsy. METHOD: A postal survey was performed with typed questionnaires being sent to 275 urology and 275 radiology centres. RESULTS: A high proportion of radiology departments in particular (83%) had protocols in place concerning the management of aspirin or warfarin prior to prostatic biopsy. A significant proportion of both radiologists and urologists have postponed biopsies due to patients unexpectedly taking these medications. Few of the respondents reported the use of pre-biopsy screening blood tests. Fifty-two percent of radiologists and 27% of urologists terminated aspirin prior to prostatic biopsy, although the urologists stopped aspirin for a long time period. Ninety-five percent of radiologists and 84% of urologists terminated warfarin prior to prostatic biopsy, although again the urologists stopped warfarin at an earlier stage. Most of those respondents who stopped warfarin prior to biopsy, also checked the INR. The urologists generally stated a higher threshold (INR) which would be considered too high to proceed. CONCLUSION: There are wide variations in practice both within and between the radiology and urology groups. This is unsurprising, since there is conflicting advice in the relevant literature.

Herniography in the investigation of groin pain in adults.

Herniography is a useful investigation in adults with unexplained groin pain in whom there is no clinical evidence of a hernia, thus ensuring appropriate surgery. The technique is described, normal anatomy and different types of hernias illustrated.

Evaluation of herniography in the diagnosis of an occult abdominal wall hernia in symptomatic adults.

Outpatient herniography as a means of confirming or refuting the presence of an occult abdominal wall hernia was performed in 50 symptomatic patients, including 13 who had previously undergone hernia repair. Altogether 30 occult hernias were detected in 27 patients, only one of which was considered to be unrelated to the presenting symptoms. On the basis of herniography, 17 patients were spared surgical exploration and, of these 17, 16 obtained a good result. One further patient with a clinically apparent hernia on one side but with contralateral symptoms was spared unnecessary surgery because the contralateral side was radiologically normal. There was one false negative and no false positive examinations. There were three minor complications: two cases of sigmoid colon puncture and one of abdominal wall haemorrhage (all managed conservatively). There were two technical failures. These results support the Scandinavian experience that herniography has a useful role in the management of patients who may have occult hernias as the underlying cause of abdominal wall symptoms.