Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US.

This paper presents a comparison of horizontal equity in health care utilization in 10 European countries and the US. It does not only extend previous work by using more recent data from a larger set of countries, but also uses new methods and presents disaggregated results by various types of care. In all countries, the lower-income groups are more intensive users of the health care system. But after indirect standardization for need differences, there is little or no evidence of significant inequity in the delivery of health care overall, though in half of the countries, significant pro-rich inequity emerges for physician contacts. This seems to be due mainly to a higher use of medical specialist services by higher-income groups and a higher use of GP care among lower-income groups. These findings appear to be fairly general and emerge in countries with very diverse characteristics regarding access and provider incentives.

Equity in the finance of health care: some further international comparisons.

This paper presents further international comparisons of progressivity of health care financing systems. The paper builds on the work of Wagstaff et al. [Wagstaff, A., van Doorslaer E., et al., 1992. Equity in the finance of health care: some international comparisons, Journal of Health Economics 11, pp. 361-387] but extends it in a number of directions: we modify the methodology used there and achieve a higher degree of cross-country comparability in variable definitions; we update and extend the cross-section of countries; and we present evidence on trends in financing mixes and progressivity.

The redistributive effect of health care finance in twelve OECD countries.

The OECD countries finance their health care through a mixture of taxes, social insurance contributions, private insurance premiums and out-of-pocket payments. The various payment sources have very different implications for both vertical and horizontal equity and on redistributive effect which is a function of both. This paper presents results on the income redistribution consequences of the health care financing mixes adopted in twelve OECD countries by decomposing the overall income redistributive effect into a progressivity, horizontal inequity and reranking component. The general finding of this study is that the vertical effect is much more important than horizontal inequity and reranking in determining the overall redistributive effect but that their relative importance varies by source of payment. Public finance sources tend to have small positive redistributive effects and less differential treatment while private financing sources generally have (larger) negative redistributive effects which are to a substantial degree caused by differential treatment.

[Income, health, and health services utilization in Germany 1992]. / Einkommen, Gesundheit und Inanspruchnahme des Gesundheitswesens in Deutschland 1992.

Data from the 1992 wave of the Socioeconomic Panel were used to analyse the relation between incomes, need for and utilisation of health care in East- and West Germany employing methods coming from the economic measurement of income distributions. "Self assessed health" and "restricted activities of daily living" were employed as need indicators. Utilisation was measured by the number of "visits to physicians" and "days in hospital". Data was available for 6435 individuals (west) and 3928 individuals (east). Income was defined as equivalent net household income with an equivalence scale derived from the german social assistance program. Compared to the concentration of income all variables in the scope of this study were only marginally concentrated (i.e. equally distributed). A slight concentration of need amongst the lower income was overcompensated by utilisation. Thus a very small impact of the German health care system favouring lower income individuals was measured. The study shows methodological problems when combining data from regions with strongly different income levels instead of analysing them separately. A combined analysis tends to underestimate concentration.

Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons.

This paper presents evidence on income-related inequalities in self-assessed health in nine industrialized countries. Health interview survey data were used to construct concentration curves of self-assessed health, measured as a latent variable. Inequalities in health favoured the higher income groups and were statistically significant in all countries. Inequalities were particularly high in the United States and the United Kingdom. Amongst other European countries, Sweden, Finland and the former East Germany had the lowest inequality. Across countries, a strong association was found between inequalities in health and inequalities in income.