Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Knee ; 24(5): 965-976, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28684171

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a surgery for acute and chronic dislocating patella. Several surgical techniques have been described. No biomechanical study has compared suture anchors, interference screws, and suspensory cortical fixation for MPFL reconstruction using human gracilis allograft. METHODS: Twelve human cadaver knees were used for the analysis of five MPFL reconstruction techniques on the femur (F) and patella (P): suspensory cortical (SC), interference screw (IS) and suture anchor (SA) fixation (SC-F/SC-P, SC-F/IS-P, SC-F/SA-P, IS-F/SC-P, IS-F/IS-P). Each method was examined six times, each using a new human gracilis allograft. The force necessary for 50% patellar displacement and 100% patellar displacement were recorded for each method. Additionally, we examined the peak force to fixation failure for all methods. Patella dislocation or loss of fixation was considered failure. RESULTS: SC-F/SC-P, IS-F/SC-P, and SC-F/IS-P required force to failure greater than that of the native MPFL. The SC-F/IS-P required the largest force to failure. The SC-F/SA-P fixation technique required significantly less force to failure (P<0.05) than the native MPFL and significantly less force to failure (P<0.05) than all four other fixation techniques. All methods of fixation employing an interference screw failed secondary to graft pullout at the interference screw-bone interface. Methods employing suture anchors and two suspensory cortical fixations failed at the graft-suture anastomosis. CONCLUSION: SC-F/SC-P, IS-F/SC-P, and SC-F/IS-P fixations were found to be stronger than the native MPFL, with the strongest being SC-F/IS-P.


Assuntos
Ligamentos Articulares/cirurgia , Luxação Patelar/cirurgia , Articulação Patelofemoral/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Parafusos Ósseos , Cadáver , Músculo Grácil/fisiologia , Músculo Grácil/transplante , Humanos , Ligamentos Articulares/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Luxação Patelar/fisiopatologia , Articulação Patelofemoral/lesões , Articulação Patelofemoral/fisiopatologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/instrumentação , Âncoras de Sutura , Técnicas de Sutura , Resistência à Tração , Transplante Homólogo
2.
Am J Sports Med ; 45(7): 1622-1626, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28297604

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple techniques for patellar fixation with classic solid suture anchors (SAs) in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction have been described. Fixation of the graft to the patella with all-soft suture anchors (ASAs) has not been studied. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate the biomechanical performance of 2 different MPFL patellar fixation techniques: ASA fixation and SA fixation. We hypothesized that the ASA group would show no statistical difference in the ultimate failure load and stiffness compared with the SA group. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Reconstruction of the MPFL with gracilis autografts was performed in 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (mean age, 52.6 ± 9.0 years). The specimens were randomly assigned to 2 groups of 8 specimens each based on the method used to fix the graft to the medial patella: ASA or SA fixation. Patellar fixation with ASAs was completed with 2 parallel 1.8-mm anchors (Q-Fix, Smith & Nephew). Fixation with SAs was completed with 2 parallel 2.9-mm anchors (Osteoraptor, Smith & Nephew). The reconstructions were cyclically loaded for 10 cycles to 25 N and then loaded in tension at 6 mm/s until failure. Ultimate failure load (N), displacement (mm), stiffness (N/mm), and mode of failure were recorded for each specimen. RESULTS: Load to failure testing showed an ultimate failure load of 228.5 ± 53.1 N in the ASA group. In the SA group, the ultimate failure load was 156.2 ± 84.9 N. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant ( P = .064). Stiffness values between the ASA and SA groups were not significantly different (21.3 ± 4.1 N/mm vs 20.9 ± 9.3 N/mm, respectively, P = .905). The most common mode of failure in both groups was anchor pullout (8 of 8 in the ASA group; 6 of 8 in the SA group). CONCLUSION: This experimental study showed no statistically significant differences in biomechanical performance between 1.8-mm ASAs and 2.9-mm SAs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patellar fixation with 2 parallel ASAs may provide adequate patellar fixation for MPFL reconstruction, while their smaller diameter could potentially decrease the risks for patella fracture and violation of the articular surface in the cadaver model.


Assuntos
Ligamentos Articulares/fisiologia , Ligamentos Articulares/cirurgia , Articulação Patelofemoral/fisiologia , Articulação Patelofemoral/cirurgia , Âncoras de Sutura , Tendões/transplante , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Cadáver , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patela/cirurgia , Distribuição Aleatória , Transplante Autólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...