Mindfulness in Pregnancy and Postpartum: Protocol of a Pilot Randomized Trial of Virtually Delivered Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy to Promote Well-Being during the Perinatal Period.

BACKGROUND: During the period from pregnancy through the first year postpartum, vulnerable individuals are at elevated risk for the onset or worsening of psychological distress, and accessible (e.g., virtually delivered) mental health interventions are needed. Research suggests that Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) can effectively mitigate psychological distress, although few studies have evaluated MBCT in the perinatal period, and samples have been clinically homogenous. Thus, we have designed and are conducting a pilot trial of virtually delivered MBCT with pregnant individuals experiencing a range of psychological symptoms to assess its feasibility and preliminarily explore its effectiveness. Here, we present the study protocol. METHODS: Eligible participants (target N = 70) are ≥18 years with pregnancies between 12 and 30 weeks of gestation. Participants complete a diagnostic interview, self-report symptom ratings, and a computerized cognitive battery assessing self-regulation at the baseline. Participants are then randomized to either MBCT or care as usual. The MBCT intervention involves eight weekly group sessions delivered virtually, with each session focusing on a mindfulness practice followed by group discussion and skill development. Participants in the intervention group are also encouraged to practice mindfulness skills between sessions. Participants in the control condition are provided with information about mindfulness and treatment resources. Baseline measures are repeated following the eight-week intervention period and at three months postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study is designed to evaluate the feasibility of virtually delivered MBCT and explore group differences in psychological symptoms during the perinatal period, and will lay the foundation for a larger clinical trial focused on optimizing this intervention to improve psychological functioning among diverse pregnant individuals.

Associations among parents' internalized weight bias, negative child-focused body talk, and feeding behaviors.

OBJECTIVE: Parents' negative body talk about children (negative weight/shape comments) and internalized weight bias (application of negative weight-based stereotypes to oneself) are associated with children's maladaptive eating behaviors, but mechanisms are poorly understood. Conceptually, parental behaviors and attitudes may translate to implicit and explicit concerns about their child's weight and influence parents' feeding practices. These associations are underexplored in the literature. METHOD: 242 parents (59.4% mothers) completed a one-time assessment that included measures of internalized weight bias, negative body talk, and feeding practices. Parents also completed assessments about one of their children, of any weight status (age range 5-15 years; 40% daughters). RESULTS: Parents' internalized weight bias was positively associated with concern about their child's weight and restriction of their child's diet. Parents' negative body talk towards their child was positively associated with concern about their child's weight and shape, restriction of their child's diet, and monitoring of their child's diet. Relative to internalized weight-bias, negative body talk had a stronger correlation with parents' concern about child weight and monitoring of child's diet. Correlations did not vary by child gender or weight category. DISCUSSION: Parents' internalized weight bias and negative body talk about their child were associated with their feeding practices across child gender and weight categories, with correlations in the small to medium range. Thus, children of all genders and weights may be vulnerable to enacted weight bias. Future studies should examine whether addressing parents' internalized weight bias and communication in family-focused interventions improves feeding practices and child well-being.