Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 50(9): 506-8, 1984 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6476614

RESUMO

Infants with respiratory distress demand prompt action and thorough evaluation for possible causes. An urgent but infrequent source of upper airway obstruction is a duplication cyst of the cervical esophagus. Standard references omit this diagnosis in the consideration of both respiratory distress and neck masses in infants. Two patients were admitted with respiratory distress and delayed recognition of a neck mass. Contrast and sonographic studies revealed a cystic mass displacing the trachea in each case. Careful excision promptly relieved symptoms, and histopathologic evaluation confirmed the diagnosis. Duplication of the esophagus can compromise the normal airway, thereby presenting with respiratory difficulty prior to recognition of a neck mass. X-ray studies demonstrating displacement of the trachea or esophagus due to a soft-tissue mass and documentation of a cyst by ultrasound will aid in establishing the diagnosis. Surgical principles include aspiration and excision of the mucosal lining, with preservation of the muscular coat and mucosal septum. Duplication of the cervical esophagus should be considered in the differential diagnosis of both respiratory distress and an enlarging neck mass in infants.


Assuntos
Esôfago/anormalidades , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Drenagem , Cisto Esofágico/complicações , Cisto Esofágico/diagnóstico , Cisto Esofágico/etiologia , Cisto Esofágico/cirurgia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pescoço/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia
2.
Arch Surg ; 118(5): 651-5, 1983 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6404238

RESUMO

A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study was performed to determine the efficacy of perioperative systemic antibiotics in preventing infection after appendectomy for acute nonperforating appendicitis. One hundred three patients received three doses of either placebo (saline, n = 52) or cefoxitin sodium (n = 51). The two groups were similar with regard to age distribution, sex ratio, duration of operation, pathologic condition of appendix, and hospital stay. Postoperative wound infections were detected in 9.6% of the placebo-treated patients, whereas none occurred in the cefoxitin group. All but one infection appeared after discharge. Cost analysis identified a net savings of $ 84 per patient with the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Septic morbidity after appendectomy for nonperforating appendicitis is significantly reduced by systemic antibiotics, and brief administration of a single broad-spectrum agent (cefoxitin) is effective prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Cefoxitina/administração & dosagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Infecção dos Ferimentos/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Apendicite/complicações , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Distribuição Aleatória
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...