Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJU Int ; 114(5): 761-9, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24274826

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current practice patterns of vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR) management and screening among paediatric urologists and their relationship with the current American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines in managing and treating VUR. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A 17-question survey was sent out to 476 paediatric urologists who are members of the Society for Pediatric Urology (SPU). In all, 133 respondents answered the survey and results were included for all questions. RESULTS: Paediatric urologists who were surveyed were consistent with the 2010 AUA guidelines in the initial evaluation of children with VUR, continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for the child aged < or >1 year, and follow-up evaluation in children with VUR. Most paediatric urologists do not obtain a serum creatinine on initial screening of children with VUR. The new guidelines address screening of siblings of patients with VUR and most paediatric urologists were consistent with these recommendations. Almost one third of responders screened all neonates diagnosed with prenatal hydronephrosis regardless of clinical history or findings on imaging despite the recommendations of the new guidelines. CONCLUSION: We conclude that based on our present sample, most paediatric urologists follow the 2010 AUA guidelines on VUR management.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Pediatria/normas , Urologia/normas , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/diagnóstico , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/terapia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
2.
Fam Med ; 40(5): 345-51, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18465284

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies show that primary care providers may suboptimally diagnose, treat, or refer patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In addition, little is known about family physicians' knowledge and practices regarding chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or monitoring for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We used a cross-sectional mail survey of members of the New Jersey Academy of Family Physicians (n=217). Outcome measures were knowledge of risk factors, screening, counseling for chronic HCV and HBV, and screening for HCC. RESULTS: Mean knowledge score for risk factors was 79% (HBV) and 70% (HCV). Physicians who diagnosed >or= six cases per year had higher knowledge of HBV risk factors. Physicians in practice >20 years had lower knowledge of HCV risk factors. Mean knowledge score for counseling was 77%. About 25% screened for liver cancer. Screening for HCC in patients with HBV was related to years in practice, female physicians, and group practice. Physicians in academic settings were more likely to screen patients with HCV for HCC. Forty-two percent and 51% referred patients with chronic HBV and chronic HCV, respectively, to the specialist for total management. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians have insufficient knowledge about screening and counseling for chronic hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Competência Clínica , Hepatite B Crônica/diagnóstico , Hepatite C Crônica/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Médicos de Família , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Hepatite B Crônica/terapia , Hepatite C Crônica/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , New Jersey , Serviços Postais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...