The role of the donor liaison officer at PlusLife (Perth Bone and Tissue Bank Inc.), Western Australia.

Femoral head donation at the time of hip replacement surgery provides a much needed resource of bone allograft to orthopaedic surgeons. Prior to 2005, potential femoral head donors were identified and consented in the hospital setting on the day of surgery. This resulted in over 40 % of donations failing post operatively suggesting that more effort could be given to pre-operative screening resulting in substantial savings in the cost associated with collection and testing of donors who were subsequently failed. The Donor Liaison role was implemented in 2005 to coordinate a Femoral Head Donation program maximising the number of successful donations through pre-operative screening. This study reviews the effectiveness of pre-operative screening of potential femoral head donors at PlusLife from 2002-2012. A retrospective audit of the database was undertaken 2002-2012 and medical/social reasons for pre-operative and postoperative failures were collated into 4 main categories to enable comparison: malignancy, autoimmune conditions, variant Creutzfeldt Jakob disease risk and general medical/social reasons. The number of femoral heads failed post operatively has decreased significantly from 26 % in 2003 to 6 % in 2012. A cost of $121,000 was expended on femoral heads failed post operatively in 2004, as compared to $20,350 in 2012. Donors excluded due to the 4 main categories (medical/social history) were identified pre-operatively in over 80 % of all cases. Preoperative screening of femoral head donors through a coordinated Femoral Head Donation Program is a safe and cost effective method.

Musculoskeletal tissue banking in Western Australia: review of the first ten years.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal tissue allotransplantation has been used as a standard approach for reconstructive surgery. The present study has reviewed the banking of musculoskeletal tissue at the Perth Bone and Tissue Bank (PBTB) and provided evidence of quality assurance on musculoskeletal tissue allotransplantation. METHODS: All donor tissues were processed in accordance with the Therapeutic Goods Administration's relevant codes of good manufacturing practices. Microbiological monitoring at each step of manufacture and postoperative surveying of the musculoskeletal allotransplantations were both conducted. The possible contribution of contaminants in allografts to postoperative infections was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 5276 donors obtained over the last 10 years, 1672 were rejected, giving an overall donor rejection rate of 32%. Milled femoral heads were the most frequently implanted allografts, followed by whole femoral heads. In the postoperative survey an infection rate of 4.9% was found (113/2321 recipients). The infectious agents were identified in 65 cases but for 60 of these there were no correlations with the positive culture test results for the allografts. The organism most commonly identified in postoperative infections was Staphylococcus species. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows evidence that musculoskeletal tissue allotransplantation is a safe procedure when accompanied by high standards of quality assurance.