A Phase 1 Study To Evaluate Safety and Pharmacokinetics following Administration of Single and Multiple Doses of the Antistaphylococcal Lysin LSVT-1701 in Healthy Adult Subjects.

Thirty-two healthy male subjects (8 per cohort) were randomized 6:2 to active:placebo. LSVT-1701, an antistaphylococcal lysin, was administered intravenously as a 6-mg/kg single dose and as 1.5, 3, and 4.5 mg/kg twice daily for 4 days. LSVT-1701 exposure increased in a greater than dose proportional manner and did not accumulate. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were predominantly of mild intensity. The most common TEAEs were chills, pyrexia, headache, infusion site events, cough, rhinorrhea, and increases in C-reactive protein. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03446053.).

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between the antiretroviral agents fostemsavir and maraviroc: a single-sequence crossover study in healthy participants.

BACKGROUND: Fostemsavir is an oral prodrug of temsavir, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial HIV attachment and entry into host immune cells. OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic interaction was determined between temsavir and maraviroc, a CCR5 allosteric inhibitor indicated for CCR5-tropic HIV-1 that may be co-administered with fostemsavir as part of combination antiretroviral therapy in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection. METHODS: This was a Phase 1, open-label, single-sequence, 3-period crossover study evaluating the effect of fostemsavir on maraviroc pharmacokinetics and the effect of maraviroc on temsavir pharmacokinetics (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02480894). Fourteen healthy participants received fostemsavir 600 mg twice daily (BID) for 4 days in Period 1 (followed by a 3-day washout), maraviroc 300 mg BID for 5 days in Period 2, and fostemsavir 600 mg BID with maraviroc 300 mg BID for 7 days in Period 3. Study drugs were administered orally with a standard meal. RESULTS: Following fostemsavir and maraviroc co-administration, maraviroc area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) increased 25% (from 1914 to 2382 ng.h/mL) and maraviroc plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctrough) increased 37% (from 36.5 to 49.9 ng/mL), but there was no change in maximum observed concentration (Cmax). Following fostemsavir and maraviroc co-administration, temsavir AUCτ and Cmax increased 10-13% and Ctrough decreased 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of fostemsavir and maraviroc did not result in clinically relevant changes in maraviroc or temsavir exposure. Fostemsavir and maraviroc may be co-administered without dose adjustment of either antiretroviral agent.

Modeling and Simulation Support Eltrombopag Dosing in Pediatric Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia.

Our objective was to support initial eltrombopag doses and dose titration based on modeling and simulation of plasma exposure and platelet count response in pediatric patients aged 1-17 years with previously treated chronic immune thrombocytopenia enrolled in two clinical studies. Data from 168 pediatric patients were used to develop a life-span population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model including three pharmacokinetic and four pharmacodynamic compartments enabling simulation of platelet counts for various starting doses and dose titration schedules. This work supported initial eltrombopag doses of 50 mg once daily (q.d.) for non-Asian patients aged ≥ 6 years and 25 mg q.d. for Asian patients, regardless of age, and for all patients aged 1-5 years, regardless of ethnic origin. Doses were escalated at 2-week intervals or reduced as needed according to each patient's platelet counts to both minimize the time to achieve target platelet counts and mitigate thrombocytosis. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00908037, NCT01520909.

Modeling and simulation support eltrombopag dosing in thrombocytopenic patients with chronic HCV infection.

PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetics of eltrombopag and its stimulation of platelet production were characterized in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection to optimize an eltrombopag dosing regimen for treatment of HCV-related thrombocytopenia before and throughout peginterferon (pegIFN)-based antiviral therapy. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic analysis for eltrombopag included 663 individuals (healthy subjects, n = 28; patients with HCV, n = 635). Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis for platelet response involved patients with HCV only. Simulations were conducted using various dosing scenarios in the same patient population. RESULTS: Eltrombopag pharmacokinetics were described by a two-compartment model with dual sequential first-order absorption and elimination. Age, race, sex, and severity of hepatic impairment were predictors of eltrombopag clearance. The effect of eltrombopag on platelet counts was adequately described by a model with four transit compartments in which eltrombopag concentrations stimulated the production rate of platelet precursors in an Emax manner. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling and simulation results support once-daily eltrombopag 25 mg as an appropriate starting dosing regimen followed by biweekly dose escalation (in 25-mg increments) up to once-daily eltrombopag 100 mg to raise platelet counts sufficiently for initiation of pegIFN-based antiviral therapy in patients with HCV. Biweekly dose adjustment allows patients to stay on the lowest possible eltrombopag dose during antiviral therapy.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of amprenavir following fosamprenavir/ritonavir administration for dose optimization in HIV infected pediatric patients.

Fosamprenavir (FPV) is the phosphate ester prodrug of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor amprenavir (APV). A pediatric population pharmacokinetic model for APV was developed and simulation was used to identify dosing regimens for pediatric patients receiving FPV in combination with ritonavir (RTV) which resulted in concentrations similar to those in adults receiving FPV/RTV 700/100 mg BID. Pharmacokinetic data was obtained from HIV infected subjects aged 2 months to 18 years receiving either FPV or FPV/RTV. A two-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination was an appropriate structural model. Significant covariates in the model included RTV coadministration on clearance, fed status on bioavailability for the oral suspension, body weight on clearance and volume terms, black race on clearance, and age on clearance. The following FPV/RTV twice daily dosing regimens in pediatric patients delivered plasma APV exposure similar to adults: 45/7 mg/kg in patients weighing <11 kg, 30/3 mg/kg in patients weighing 11 to <15 kg, 23/3 mg/kg in patients weighing 15 to <20 kg, and 18/3 mg/kg in patients weighting ≥20 kg. Additionally children weighing ≥39 kg can receive the adult regimen.

Lack of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between the thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag and hepatitis C virus protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir.

Eltrombopag is an orally bioavailable thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia associated with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This study evaluated the potential drug-drug interactions between eltrombopag and the HCV protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir. In this open-label, 3-period, single-sequence, and crossover study, 56 healthy adult subjects were randomized 1:1 to cohort 1 (boceprevir) or 2 (telaprevir). The dosing was as follows: period 1, single 200-mg dose of eltrombopag; period 2, 800 mg boceprevir or 750 mg telaprevir every 8 hours (q8h) for 10 days; and period 3, single 200-mg dose of eltrombopag with either 800 mg boceprevir or 750 mg telaprevir q8h (3 doses). All doses were administered with food, and eltrombopag was administered specifically with low-calcium food. There was a 3-day washout between periods 1 and 2 and no washout between periods 2 and 3. Serial pharmacokinetic samples were collected for 72 h in periods 1 and 3 and for 8 h in period 2. The coadministration of eltrombopag increased the rate of boceprevir absorption, resulting in a 20% increase in the maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax), a 1-h-earlier time to Cmax (Tmax) for boceprevir, a 32% decrease in the concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cτ), and no change in the area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0-τ). The coadministration of eltrombopag did not alter telaprevir pharmacokinetics, and the coadministration of boceprevir or telaprevir did not alter eltrombopag pharmacokinetics. Dysgeusia, headache, and somnolence occurred in ≥2 subjects. One subject withdrew because of nausea, headache, dizziness, sinus pressure, and vomiting. There were no severe or serious adverse events. Dose adjustment is not required when eltrombopag is coadministered with boceprevir or telaprevir given the lack of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction.

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of eltrombopag in healthy volunteers and subjects with chronic liver disease.

AIMS: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) of eltrombopag in chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS: The PK/PD model was developed using data from 79 CLD patients using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. RESULTS: The PK of eltrombopag were described by a two-compartment model with dual sequential first-order absorption. Gender, race and severity of CLD were predictors of the apparent clearance of eltrombopag. The PD of eltrombopag in CLD were adequately described by a four-compartment lifespan model, in which eltrombopag stimulated platelet precursor production rate. East Asian CLD patients were less sensitive to the stimulatory effect of eltrombopag. Following a daily dose regimen of 50 mg eltrombopag, the time to achieve peak platelet counts was longer for the CLD population compared with patients who had immune thrombocytopenic purpura, but was comparable to patients with hepatitis C. Likewise, it took a longer time for platelet counts to rebound back to baseline once eltrombopag treatment was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: The time course of the platelet response in CLD was different from that in immune thrombocytopenic purpura but comparable to that in hepatitis C.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of fosamprenavir/ritonavir-containing regimens in HIV-infected children aged 4 weeks to 2 years-48-week study data.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of fosamprenavir (FPV) with ritonavir (RTV) twice daily were evaluated in HIV-1-infected infants and children 4 weeks to <2 years over 48 weeks. METHODS: Results from intensive pharmacokinetic sampling of subjects enrolled in single dose visits was used to determine individualized dosing for the first 6-10 subjects in each of 2 cohorts (4 weeks to <6 months, 6 months to <2 years); steady state pharmacokinetic data were then used to select the dosage regimen for the remaining subjects recruited to the cohort. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at week 2 or 8; predose samples were collected every 4-12 weeks thereafter. Safety and plasma HIV-1 RNA were monitored every 4-12 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-nine subjects received study medication. FPV 45 mg/kg boosted with RTV 7 to 10 mg/kg BID achieved average plasma amprenavir area under curve(0-τ) values 26% to 28% lower and Cmax similar to historical adult data for FPV/RTV 700/100 mg BID; amprenavir Cτ values were lower in the subjects <6 months of age. At week 48, 35 of 54 (65%) subjects had achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL and 33 of 54 (61%) had plasma HIV-1 RNA values <50 copies/mL. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, gastroenteritis and otitis media. CONCLUSIONS: Final FPV/RTV dosing regimens achieved plasma amprenavir exposures comparable with those from regimens approved in adults, with the exception of trough exposures in the <6-month-old infants. The FPV/RTV regimens led to viral suppression in 61% of patients and were generally well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics and 48-week safety and antiviral activity of fosamprenavir-containing regimens in HIV-infected 2- to 18-year-old children.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of twice-daily fosamprenavir with or without ritonavir were evaluated in 2- to 18-year-old protease inhibitor-naïve and -experienced HIV-1-infected children. METHODS: Serial pharmacokinetic samples were collected at week 2 and predose samples every 4-12 weeks. Safety and plasma HIV-1 RNA were monitored every 4-12 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty protease inhibitor-naïve 2- to <6-year-old subjects received antiretroviral treatment including unboosted fosamprenavir twice-daily, whereas 89 protease inhibitor-naïve and -experienced 2- to 18-year-old subjects received fosamprenavir/ritonavir-containing therapy twice-daily. Median fosamprenavir exposure was 891 days (range 15-1805 days), with 88% exposed >48 weeks. Twice-daily doses of fosamprenavir/ritonavir 23/3 mg/kg in 2- to <6-year olds, 18/3 mg/kg in ≥6-year olds and 700/100 mg in adolescents achieved plasma amprenavir exposures comparable with or higher than 700/100 mg twice-daily in adults while fosamprenavir 30 mg/kg twice-daily in 2- to <6-year olds led to exposures higher than 1400 mg twice-daily in adults. The proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL at week 48 was 60% for fosamprenavir and 53-74% for fosamprenavir/ritonavir (intent-to-treat [exposed], snapshot analysis). Median increases in absolute and relative (percentage) CD4 counts from baseline to week 48 occurred in both the fosamprenavir (340 cells/mm; 8%) and fosamprenavir/ritonavir group (190 cells/mm; 8%). The most common adverse events were vomiting, cough, and diarrhea; 18 subjects experienced serious adverse events, including 9 with suspected abacavir hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Fosamprenavir regimens administered to HIV-1-infected children aged 2-18 years were generally well-tolerated and provided sustained antiviral activity over 48 weeks, with plasma amprenavir exposures comparable with or higher than adults.

Assessment of the pharmacokinetic interaction between eltrombopag and lopinavir-ritonavir in healthy adult subjects.

Eltrombopag is an orally bioavailable thrombopoietin receptor agonist that is approved for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. It is being developed for other medical disorders that are associated with thrombocytopenia. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may suffer from thrombocytopenia as a result of their HIV disease or coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). HIV medications, particularly ritonavir (RTV)-boosted HIV protease inhibitors, are involved in many drug interactions. This study evaluated the potential drug-drug interaction between eltrombopag and lopinavir (LPV)/RTV. Forty healthy adult subjects enrolled in this open-label, three-period, single-sequence crossover study received a single 100-mg dose of eltrombopag (period 1), LPV/RTV at 400/100 mg twice daily (BID) for 14 days (period 2), and LPV/RTV at 400/100 mg BID (2 doses) with a single 100-mg dose of eltrombopag administered with the morning LPV/RTV dose (period 3). There was a 3-day washout between periods 1 and 2 and no washout between periods 2 and 3. Serial pharmacokinetic samples were collected during 72 h in periods 1 and 3 and during 12 h in period 2. The coadministration of 400/100 mg LPV/RTV BID with a single dose of 100 mg eltrombopag decreased the plasma eltrombopag area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) by 17%, on average, with no change in plasma LPV/RTV exposure. Adverse events (AEs) reported in period 2 were consistent with known LPV/RTV AEs, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, rash, and fatigue. No subjects withdrew due to AEs, and no serious AEs were reported. These study results suggest that platelet counts should be monitored and the eltrombopag dose adjusted accordingly if LPV/RTV therapy is initiated or discontinued.

A randomized, open-label, 5-period, balanced crossover study to evaluate the relative bioavailability of eltrombopag powder for oral suspension (PfOS) and tablet formulations and the effect of a high-calcium meal on eltrombopag pharmacokinetics when administered with or 2 hours before or after PfOS.

BACKGROUND: Bioavailability of the tablet formulation of eltrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist indicated for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia, is reduced by chelation of polyvalent cations (eg, calcium). A powder for oral suspension (PfOS) formulation has been developed for use in pediatrics. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the bioavailability of eltrombopag PfOS relative to the tablet formulation and the effect of a high-calcium meal on PfOS bioavailability. METHODS: In this single-dose, open-label, randomized-sequence, crossover study, healthy subjects received 25 mg eltrombopag orally as a tablet fasted and as PfOS fasted or with, 2 hours before, or 2 hours after a high-calcium meal. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from plasma concentration-time data collected over 72 hours post-dose. Tolerability was assessed by laboratory tests, physical examinations, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The 40 enrolled subjects included 22 males and 18 females of white/European (60%) or African-American/African (40%) heritage with mean (SD) (mininum, maximum) age of 34 (12) (19, 62) years, weight of 75 (12) (54, 101) kg, and body mass index of 25.8 (2.9) (19.7, 30) kg/m(2). Plasma eltrombopag AUC(0-∞) was higher for the PfOS than the tablet (geometric least-squares mean ratio [GMR]: 1.22; 90% CI: 1.08-1.38). Plasma eltrombopag AUC(0-∞) was reduced when the PfOS was administered with a high-calcium meal (GMR: 0.25; 90% CI: 0.224-0.287) or 2 hours after a meal (GMR: 0.53; 90% CI: 0.470-0.601), and, to a lesser extent, when administered 2 hours before a meal (GMR: 0.80; 90% CI: 0.711-0.908). The absorption lag time and t(½) did not differ between treatments; T(max) was delayed 1 hour when the PfOS was dosed with a high-calcium meal. AEs were not serious and mild or moderate in intensity. AEs reported in >1 subject included headache (11 subjects; 27.5%), presyncope (3 subjects, 7.5%), and vomiting (2 subjects, 5%). No clinically significant trends in laboratory tests or vital signs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a healthy adult volunteer population, bioavailability of eltrombopag PfOS was greater than the tablet and was reduced when administered with or 2 hours before or after a high-calcium meal; this effect was attenuated with PfOS dosing 2 hours before the meal. Eltrombopag was generally well tolerated.

Metabolism and disposition of eltrombopag, an oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist, in healthy human subjects.

The metabolism and disposition of eltrombopag, the first-in-class small molecule human thrombopoietin receptor agonist, were studied in six healthy men after a single oral administration of a solution dose of [(14)C]eltrombopag (75 mg, 100 µCi). Eltrombopag was well tolerated. The drug was quickly absorbed and was the predominant circulating component in plasma (accounting for 63% of the total plasma radioactivity). A mono-oxygenation metabolite (M1) and acyl glucuronides (M2) of eltrombopag were minor circulating components. The predominant route of elimination of radioactivity was fecal (58.9%). Feces contained approximately 20% of dose as glutathione-related conjugates (M5, M6, and M7) and another 20% as unchanged eltrombopag. The glutathione conjugates were probably detoxification products of a p-imine methide intermediate formed by metabolism of M1, which arises through cytochrome P450-dependent processes. Low levels of covalently bound drug-related intermediates to plasma proteins, which could result from the reaction of the imine methide or acyl glucuronide conjugates with proteins, were detected. The bound material contributes to the longer plasma elimination half-life of radioactivity. Renal elimination of conjugates of hydrazine cleavage metabolites (mostly as M3 and M4) accounted for 31% of the radiodose, with no unchanged eltrombopag detected in urine.

Novel 4,4-disubstituted piperidine-based C-C chemokine receptor-5 inhibitors with high potency against human immunodeficiency virus-1 and an improved human ether-a-go-go related gene (hERG) profile.

We recently described ( J. Med. Chem. 2008 , 51 , 6538 - 6546 ) a novel class of CCR5 antagonists with strong anti-HIV potency. Herein, we detail SAR converting leads 1 and 2 to druglike molecules. The pivotal structural motif enabling this transition was the secondary sulfonamide substituent. Further fine-tuning of the substituent pattern in the sulfonamide paved the way to enhancing potency and bioavailability and minimizing hERG inhibition, resulting in discovery of clinical compound 122 (GSK163929).

Eltrombopag increases plasma rosuvastatin exposure in healthy volunteers.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: OATP1B1 is important for hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin and BCRP is important for rosuvastatin absorption and elimination. Eltrombopag inhibits OATP1B1 and BCRP in vitro at clinically relevant concentrations. Inhibition of these transporters could change cholesterol-lowering efficacy and increase the risk of exposure-dependent toxicities. To determine if co-administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin alters plasma rosuvastatin exposure, an open-label study was conducted in 42 healthy adult subjects. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Concomitant administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin was associated with increased rosuvastatin exposure via inhibition of drug transporters. The therapeutic index of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors may be reduced by the concomitant use of eltrombopag. In subjects taking eltrombopag, a reduced dose of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors may be needed. AIM: Eltrombopag, an oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist, inhibits the organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in vitro. OATP1B1 is important for hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin and inhibition of this transporter could reduce cholesterol-lowering efficacy and increase the risk of exposure-dependent toxicities. In contrast, BCRP is an efflux transporter and inhibition of this transporter could increase both hepatic and plasma rosuvastatin concentrations, resulting in increased efficacy and toxicity. To determine if co-administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin alters plasma rosuvastatin exposure, an open-label study was conducted in 42 healthy adult subjects. METHODS: Subjects received rosuvastatin and eltrombopag orally: day 1, rosuvastatin 10 mg single dose; days 6 to 9, eltrombopag 75 mg once daily; day 10, eltrombopag 75 mg once daily and rosuvastatin 10 mg single dose. Adverse event assessments were performed daily and at the follow-up visit. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected days 1 to 5 and days 10 to 14. RESULTS: Co-administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin increased geometric mean (90% confidence interval) plasma rosuvastatin AUC(0,∞) by 55% (42%, 69%) and C(max) by 103% (82%, 126%) in the overall study population, with a larger interaction in the non-Asian compared with Asian subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin was associated with increased rosuvastatin exposure. The therapeutic index of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors may be reduced by the concomitant use of eltrombopag. In subjects taking eltrombopag, a reduced dose of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors may be needed.

Clinical pharmacokinetics, platelet response, and safety of eltrombopag at supratherapeutic doses of up to 200 mg once daily in healthy volunteers.

This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel, dose-escalation study to assess the pharmacokinetics, platelet response, safety, and tolerability of supratherapeutic doses of eltrombopag (100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg once daily) administered for 5 days to 33 healthy adult volunteers. Plasma eltrombopag concentrations accumulated between days 1 and 5, with average increases of 66% to 81% for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the 24-hour dosing interval (AUC(0-τ)) and 32% to 45% for maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) across doses. After 5 days of dosing, AUC(0-τ) was dose-proportional and C(max) was less than dose-proportional over eltrombopag 100 to 200 mg with slope estimates (90% confidence intervals) of 0.92 (0.45-1.39) and 0.76 (0.29-1.22), respectively. Platelet counts peaked at day 14, and maximum change from baseline platelet count increased dose-dependently, with mean platelet count increases of 14, 67, 107, and 150 Gi/L for placebo and eltrombopag 100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg, respectively. There was no notable difference in day 14 mean platelet aggregation between eltrombopag (59 to 74%) and placebo (67%), although this was not tested statistically. There was no notable difference in adverse event frequency across eltrombopag doses. Eltrombopag pharmacokinetics and platelet response were dose-dependent, and doses up to 200 mg/d were well tolerated, with safety profiles similar to placebo.

Population PK/PD modeling of eltrombopag in healthy volunteers and patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and optimization of response-guided dosing.

The relationship between plasma eltrombopag concentrations and increases in platelet counts (PLTC) was characterized in healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) using population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models. The semiphysiological model included 3 PK, 1 precursor production, 2 maturation, and 1 blood platelet compartments and assumed a linear increase in platelet production rate with eltrombopag concentrations. Thrombopoiesis was assumed to be the same in HVs and patients, whereas platelets degraded more rapidly in patients. A mixture model was used, with nonresponders accounting for 19% of the patients. The following covariates were predictive of higher PLTC in ITP patients based on PK or PD differences in descending order of magnitude: East Asian race, age 65 years or older, baseline PLTC greater than 15 Gi/L, female, and concurrent corticosteroid. Simulations support starting eltrombopag at a dose of 50 mg once daily, except in East Asian patients, for whom 25 mg once daily is warranted. Doses can be titrated at 2-week intervals (or longer) to achieve target PLTC.

Effect of hepatic or renal impairment on eltrombopag pharmacokinetics.

Eltrombopag, an oral, small-molecule, nonpeptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist for the treatment of thrombocytopenia, is highly protein bound and primarily eliminated via metabolism in the liver and gastrointestinal tract. Single-dose eltrombopag pharmacokinetics were evaluated in participants with hepatic or renal impairment given possible changes in systemic exposure due to reduced plasma protein binding or reduced metabolism. All participants received a single 50-mg dose of eltrombopag. The adverse event profile was similar across groups, with headache, nausea, and back pain most frequently reported. Compared with healthy participants, participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment had mean increases in AUC(0-∞) of 41%, 93%, and 80%, and participants with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment had mean decreases in AUC(0-∞) of 32%, 36%, and 60%. There was high pharmacokinetic variability and significant overlap in exposures between participants with hepatic or renal impairment and healthy participants. Results suggest that patients with renal impairment may initiate eltrombopag with the standard 50-mg once-daily starting regimen, whereas patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment should consider a lower 25-mg once-daily regimen. Patients with hepatic or renal impairment should be closely monitored for platelet response and safety, and eltrombopag doses should be adjusted accordingly.

Similar virologic and immunologic efficacy with fosamprenavir boosted with 100 mg or 200 mg of ritonavir in HIV-infected patients: results of the LESS trial.

PURPOSE: ritonavir (RTV) effectively boosts most protease inhibitors but is associated with significant dose-dependent adverse events (AEs). In an effort to better manage toxicities through a reduced dose of RTV, this study compared fosamprenavir (FPV) boosted with RTV 100 mg (FPV/r100) or with RTV 200 mg (FPV/r200) daily. METHODS: this 24-week, open-label study enrolled patients taking a FPV/r 200-containing regimen who had HIV RNA <400 copies/mL and randomized them 1:2 to continue that regimen or simplify to FPV/r100 once daily. Other medications were not altered. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients without suspected or confirmed virologic failure (HIV RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL) through week 24 by a missing/discontinuation equals failure (M/D=F) analysis. Noninferiority criteria were demonstrated if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the primary endpoint rates between groups was greater than -12. RESULTS: the 2 regimens met prespecified noninferiority criteria (FPV/r100, 92%; FPV/r 200, 94%; 95% CI, -9.36 to 5.12). At week 24, the percentage of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL by M/ D=F was 83% in the FPV/r100 group and 85% in the FPV/r 200 group. Drug-related grade 2-4 AEs were uncommon (FPV/r100, 4%; FPV/r 200, 7%). Median changes in lipids were similar in both groups, with the exception of triglycerides (FPV/r100, -21 mg/dL; FPV/r 200, -2 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS: this 24-week study demonstrated that among previously suppressed patients, once-daily FPV/r100 was similar to FPV/r 200 in virologic and immunologic effects but was associated with greater decreases from baseline in triglyceride levels.

Eltrombopag does not affect cardiac repolarization: results from a definitive QTc study in healthy subjects.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Some non-anti-arrhythmic drugs delay cardiac repolarization, which can be measured as an increase in the QT interval. Delays in cardiac repolarization create an electrophysiological environment that favours the development of cardiac arrhythmias, which may lead to torsade de pointes, which can be fatal. As part of the clinical development of eltrombopag, a thorough QT(c) study was conducted to evaluate the effects of eltrombopag on cardiac repolarization at both therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses and to characterize the relationship between plasma eltrombopag concentrations and change in QT(c). WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study found no clinically significant QT prolongation for eltrombopag when administered as 50 mg or 150 mg every day for 5 days. There were no safety or tolerability signals of clinical concern. A small incidence of ventricular premature beats was observed, but this was consistent with previously reported incidences in healthy volunteers without apparent heart disease. AIM: To evaluate the effect of eltrombopag on cardiac repolarization and to characterize the relationship between plasma eltrombopag concentrations and change in QT(c). METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, randomized, balanced four-period, crossover study in healthy men and women. Subjects were randomized to receive eltrombopag 50 mg and 150 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control) and placebo in one of four sequences. RESULTS: Eighty-seven subjects entered the study and 48 completed. There was no prolongation of QT(c) (Fridericia) following eltrombopag treatment, as the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the time-matched change from baseline in QT(c)F between drug and placebo (ddQT(c)F) did not exceed 10 ms for eltrombopag at either dose. Maximum observed mean treatment difference was 2.29 ms (90% CI 0.34, 4.24) for eltrombopag 150 mg at 1 h post-dose and 11.64 ms (90% CI 9.64, 13.64) for moxifloxacin 400 mg at 4 h. Eltrombopag C(max) and AUC(0,24 h) increased in a dose proportional manner between 50 mg and 150 mg after 5 days' dosing. Proportions of subjects with adverse events were similar across treatments (52-66% of subjects). Most withdrawals (26/39 subjects) were due to elevated platelets. Three subjects were withdrawn for ventricular premature beats (one following each active treatment) reported as related to the study drug. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically significant QT(c) prolongation was observed for eltrombopag at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses.