Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 29(4): 329-340, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31776197

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we used human factors (HF) methods and principles to design a clinical decision support (CDS) that provides cognitive support to the pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnostic decision-making process in the emergency department. We hypothesised that the application of HF methods and principles will produce a more usable CDS that improves PE diagnostic decision-making, in particular decision about appropriate clinical pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a scenario-based simulation study to compare a HF-based CDS (the so-called CDS for PE diagnosis (PE-Dx CDS)) with a web-based CDS (MDCalc); 32 emergency physicians performed various tasks using both CDS. PE-Dx integrated HF design principles such as automating information acquisition and analysis, and minimising workload. We assessed all three dimensions of usability using both objective and subjective measures: effectiveness (eg, appropriate decision regarding the PE diagnostic pathway), efficiency (eg, time spent, perceived workload) and satisfaction (perceived usability of CDS). RESULTS: Emergency physicians made more appropriate diagnostic decisions (94% with PE-Dx; 84% with web-based CDS; p<0.01) and performed experimental tasks faster with the PE-Dx CDS (on average 96 s per scenario with PE-Dx; 117 s with web-based CDS; p<0.001). They also reported lower workload (p<0.001) and higher satisfaction (p<0.001) with PE-Dx. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation study shows that HF methods and principles can improve usability of CDS and diagnostic decision-making. Aspects of the HF-based CDS that provided cognitive support to emergency physicians and improved diagnostic performance included automation of information acquisition (eg, auto-populating risk scoring algorithms), minimisation of workload and support of decision selection (eg, recommending a clinical pathway). These HF design principles can be applied to the design of other CDS technologies to improve diagnostic safety.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Simulação por Computador , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Médicos/psicologia , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Design Centrado no Usuário , Adulto , Eficiência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação Pessoal , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 74(2): 285-296, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30611639

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: As electronic health records evolve, integration of computerized clinical decision support offers the promise of sorting, collecting, and presenting this information to improve patient care. We conducted a systematic review to examine the scope and influence of electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support technologies implemented in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A literature search was conducted in 4 databases from their inception through January 18, 2018: PubMed, Scopus, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, and Cochrane Central. Studies were included if they examined the effect of a decision support intervention that was implemented in a comprehensive electronic health record in the ED setting. Standardized data collection forms were developed and used to abstract study information and assess risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 2,558 potential studies were identified after removal of duplicates. Of these, 42 met inclusion criteria. Common targets for clinical decision support intervention included medication and radiology ordering practices, as well as more comprehensive systems supporting diagnosis and treatment for specific disease entities. The majority of studies (83%) reported positive effects on outcomes studied. Most studies (76%) used a pre-post experimental design, with only 3 (7%) randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSION: Numerous studies suggest that clinical decision support interventions are effective in changing physician practice with respect to process outcomes such as guideline adherence; however, many studies are small and poorly controlled. Future studies should consider the inclusion of more specific information in regard to design choices, attempt to improve on uncontrolled before-after designs, and focus on clinically relevant outcomes wherever possible.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência ao Paciente/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...