Evaluation of the high definition field of view option of a large-bore computed tomography scanner for radiation therapy simulation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) scanning is the basis for radiation treatment planning, but the 50-cm standard scanning field of view (sFOV) may be too small for imaging larger patients. We evaluated the 65-cm high-definition (HD) FOV of a large-bore CT scanner for CT number accuracy, geometric distortion, image quality degradation, and dosimetric accuracy of photon treatment plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT number accuracy was tested by placing two 16-cm acrylic phantoms on either side of a 40-cm phantom to simulate a large patient extending beyond the 50-cm-diameter standard scanning FOV. Dosimetric accuracy was tested using anthropomorphic pelvis and thorax phantoms, with additional acrylic body parts on either side of the phantoms. Two volumetric modulated arc therapy beams (a 15-MV and a 6-MV) were used to cover the planning target volumes. Two-dimensional dose distributions were evaluated with GAFChromic film and point dose accuracy was checked with multiple thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) capsules placed in the phantoms. Image quality was tested by placing an American College of Radiology accreditation phantom inside the 40-cm phantom. RESULTS: The HD FOV showed substantial changes in CT numbers, with differences of 314 HU-725 HU at different density levels. The volume of the body parts extending into the HD FOV was distorted. However, TLD-reported doses for all PTVs agreed within ± 3%. Dose agreement in organs at risk were within the passing criteria, and the gamma index pass rate was >97%. Image quality was degraded. CONCLUSIONS: The HD FOV option is adequate for RT simulation and met accreditation standards, although care should be taken during contouring because of reduced image quality.

Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained popularity in radiation therapy simulation because it provides superior soft tissue contrast, which facilitates more accurate target delineation compared with computed tomography (CT) and does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation. However, image registration errors in commercial software have not been widely reported. Here we evaluated the accuracy of deformable image registration (DIR) by using a physical phantom for MRI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used the "Wuphantom" for end-to-end testing of DIR accuracy for MRI. This acrylic phantom is filled with water and includes several fillable inserts to simulate various tissue shapes and properties. Deformations and changes in anatomic locations are simulated by changing the rotations of the phantom and inserts. We used Varian Velocity DIR software (v4.0) and CT (head and neck protocol) and MR (T1- and T2-weighted head protocol) images to test DIR accuracy between image modalities (MRI vs CT) and within the same image modality (MRI vs MRI) in 11 rotation deformation scenarios. Large inserts filled with Mobil DTE oil were used to simulate fatty tissue, and small inserts filled with agarose gel were used to simulate tissues slightly denser than water (e.g., prostate). Contours of all inserts were generated before DIR to provide a baseline for contour size and shape. DIR was done with the MR Correctable Deformable DIR method, and all deformed contours were compared with the original contours. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) were used to quantitatively validate DIR accuracy. We also used large and small regions of interest (ROIs) during between-modality DIR tests to simulate validation of DIR accuracy for organs at risk (OARs) and propagation of individual clinical target volume (CTV) contours. RESULTS: No significant differences in DIR accuracy were found for T1:T1 and T2:T2 comparisons (P > 0.05). DIR was less accurate for between-modality comparisons than for same-modality comparisons, and was less accurate for T1 vs CT than for T2 vs CT (P < 0.001). For between-modality comparisons, use of a small ROI improved DIR accuracy for both T1 and T2 images. CONCLUSION: The simple design of the Wuphantom allows seamless testing of DIR; here we validated the accuracy of MRI DIR in end-to-end testing. T2 images had superior DIR accuracy compared with T1 images. Use of small ROIs improves DIR accuracy for target contour propagation.

Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom.

PURPOSE: Kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used for patient alignment, contour propagation, and adaptive treatment planning in radiation therapy. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of deformable image registration (DIR) for CBCT under various imaging protocols with different noise and patient dose levels. METHODS: A physical phantom previously developed to facilitate end-to-end testing of the DIR accuracy was used with Varian Velocity v4.0 software to evaluate the performance of image registration from CT to CT, CBCT to CT, and CBCT to CBCT. The phantom is acrylic and includes several inserts that simulate different tissue shapes and properties. Deformations and anatomic changes were simulated by changing the rotations of both the phantom and the inserts. CT images (from a head and neck protocol) and CBCT images (from pelvis, head and "Image Gently" protocols) were obtained with different image noise and dose levels. Large inserts were filled with Mobil DTE oil to simulate soft tissue, and small inserts were filled with bone materials. All inserts were contoured before the DIR process to provide a ground truth contour size and shape for comparison. After the DIR process, all deformed contours were compared with the originals using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA). Both large and small volume of interests (VOIs) for DIR volume selection were tested by simulating a DIR process that included whole patient image volume and clinical target volumes (CTV) only (for CTVs propagation). RESULTS: For cross-modality DIR registration (CT to CBCT), the DSC were >0.8 and the MDA were <3 mm for CBCT pelvis, and CBCT head protocols. For CBCT to CBCT and CT to CT, the DIR accuracy was improved relative to the cross-modality tests. For smaller VOIs, the DSC were >0.8 and MDA <2 mm for all modalities. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of DIR depends on the quality of the CBCT image at different dose and noise levels.

Characterization of a new physical phantom for testing rigid and deformable image registration.

The purpose of this study was to describe a new user-friendly, low-cost phantom that was developed to test the accuracy of rigid and deformable image registration (DIR) systems and to demonstrate the functional efficacy of the new phantom. The phantom was constructed out of acrylic and includes a variety of inserts that simulate different tissue shapes and properties. It can simulate deformations and location changes in patient anatomy by changing the rotations of both the phantom and the inserts. CT scans of this phantom were obtained and used to test the rigid and deformable registration accuracy of the Velocity software. Eight rotation and translation scenarios were used to test the rigid registration accuracy, and 11 deformation scenarios were used to test the DIR accuracy. The mean rotation accuracies in the X-Y (axial) and X-Z (coronal) planes were 0.50° and 0.13°, respectively. The mean translation accuracy was 1 mm in both the X and Y direction and was tested in soft tissue and bone. The DIR accuracies for soft tissue and bone were 0.93 (mean Dice similarity coefficient), 8.3 and 4.5 mm (mean Hausdouff distance), 0.95 and 0.79 mm (mean distance), and 1.13 and 1.12 (mean volume ratio) for soft tissue content (DTE oil) and bone, respectively. The new phantom has a simple design and can be constructed at a low cost. This phantom will allow DIR systems to be effectively and efficiently verified to ensure system performance.

Is there a clinical benefit with a smooth compensator design compared with a plunged compensator design for passive scattered protons?

In proton therapy, passive scattered proton plans use compensators to conform the dose to the distal surface of the planning volume. These devices are custom made from acrylic or wax for each treatment field using either a plunge-drilled or smooth-milled compensator design. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there is a clinical benefit of generating passive scattered proton radiation treatment plans with the smooth compensator design. We generated 4 plans with different techniques using the smooth compensators. We chose 5 sites and 5 patients for each site for the range of dosimetric effects to show adequate sample. The plans were compared and evaluated using multicriteria (MCA) plan quality metrics for plan assessment and comparison using the Quality Reports [EMR] technology by Canis Lupus LLC. The average absolute difference for dosimetric metrics from the plunged-depth plan ranged from -4.7 to +3.0 and the average absolute performance results ranged from -6.6% to +3%. The manually edited smooth compensator plan yielded the best dosimetric metric, +3.0, and performance, + 3.0% compared to the plunged-depth plan. It was also superior to the other smooth compensator plans. Our results indicate that there are multiple approaches to achieve plans with smooth compensators similar to the plunged-depth plans. The smooth compensators with manual compensator edits yielded equal or better target coverage and normal tissue (NT) doses compared with the other smooth compensator techniques. Further studies are under investigation to evaluate the robustness of the smooth compensator design.

Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta? Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of shear stress (SS) in plaque regression. BACKGROUND: A condition favorable to the development of atherosclerotic lesions is low oscillating SS. In the descending thoracic aorta, the relationship between plaque distribution and SS has never been characterized. The regression of plaque as the result of lipid-lowering therapy is associated with reverse atherogenic mechanisms. Therefore, we investigated the role of SS in plaque regression. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a unique opportunity to noninvasively study morphology and hemodynamics. METHODS: Cross-sectional images of atherosclerotic plaques in the descending thoracic aorta of 10 asymptomatic, hypercholesteremic patients were acquired at baseline and 24 months after starting lipid-lowering therapy by using a black-blood sequence on a 1.5-T clinical MRI system (5 mm x 780 microm x 780 microm). Average wall thickness (WT) was derived per quadrant. The aorta was subdivided in segments 2 cm in length starting 1 cm from the aortic arch. RESULTS: Average WT decreased with increasing distance from the arch (3.0 +/- 0.7 mm vs. 2.5 +/- 0.3 mm; p < 0.05) and showed a helical pattern from the proximal to distal segments. Phase-contrast MRI was performed in the thoracic aorta of eight healthy volunteers to derive typical average SS distribution. Shear stress predicted the location of WT (r(2) = 0.29, p < 0.05) but did not predict plaque regression. The best predictor of plaque regression was baseline WT. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showing an association between WT and average low SS locations support the role of local hemodynamics in the development of atherosclerotic lesions in descending thoracic aorta. Furthermore, SS does not seem to be the major predictor for plaque regression by lipid-lowering interventions. Therefore, our data suggest that other mechanisms are involved in the lipid-reversal mechanism.

The importance of end-systole for optimal reconstruction protocol of coronary angiography with 16-slice multidetector computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: Multidetector-row computed tomography coronary images are usually analyzed in mid-diastole (MD). Because of slow coronary motion also in end-systole (ES), we evaluated the impact on image quality of including ES images and defined an efficient reconstruction protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 50 coronary multidetector-row computed tomography studies, 9 reconstructions (at 10% increments of the RR interval) were graded for image quality. Multiple combinations of reconstructions were compared. RESULTS: MD (60-70% of the RR interval) offered the best image quality. In 44% patients, the best reconstruction for >or=1 coronary was found in ES (20-30%). Their heart rate was higher (68.2+/-9.9 bpm vs. 59.2+/-8.8 bpm, P=0.0014). Combining ES and MD consistently offered superior image quality and less nonevaluable vessels than even larger numbers of diastolic reconstructions alone. A combination of 2-3 reconstructions was most efficient. Adding more reconstructions did not significantly improve results. CONCLUSIONS: Combining ES and MD reconstructions reduces nonevaluable coronary arteries, particularly with higher heart rates. A protocol including 2-3 reconstructions is the most efficient.

Parallel and nonparallel simultaneous multislice black-blood double inversion recovery techniques for vessel wall imaging.

PURPOSE: To reduce long examination times of black-blood vessel wall imaging by acquiring multiple slices simultaneously and by using parallel acquisition techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DIR-rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) techniques imaging up to 10 simultaneous slices per acquisition with single and multiple 180 degrees -reinversion pulses were developed. A slab-selective reinversion multislice DIR-RARE sequence incorporating generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) imaging was implemented. Four-channel and eight-channel carotid coils were built to test these sequences. A total of 11 subjects were studied. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency factor (SEF, SNR/unit time/slice) were measured from aortic images of three healthy subjects to determine optimal MR parameters. The DIR-RARE-GRAPPA sequence was run on aortas and carotid arteries of the five remaining healthy subjects and three atherosclerotic patients with optimal parameters (acquisition times 12-21 seconds). RESULTS: SEFs of slab-selective protocols were significantly higher than those of slice-selective protocols, and SEFs of DIR-RARE-GRAPPA protocols were significantly higher than corresponding non-GRAPPA protocols (P < 0.05). CNR was not significantly different for all imaging protocols. The DIR-RARE-GRAPPA multislice sequence showed 8.35-fold time improvement vs. single-slice DIR-2RARE sequence. CONCLUSION: Future MRI atherosclerotic plaque studies can be performed in substantially shorter times using these methods.