Do Individual Surgeon Preferences Affect Procedural Outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: Surgeon preferences such as instrument and suture selection and idiosyncratic approaches to individual procedure steps have been largely viewed as minor differences in the surgical workflow. We hypothesized that idiosyncratic approaches could be quantified and shown to have measurable effects on procedural outcomes. METHODS: At the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinical Congress, experienced surgeons volunteered to wear motion tracking sensors and be videotaped while evaluating a loop of porcine intestines to identify and repair 2 preconfigured, standardized enterotomies. Video annotation was used to identify individual surgeon preferences and motion data was used to quantify surgical actions. χ 2 analysis was used to determine whether surgical preferences were associated with procedure outcomes (bowel leak). RESULTS: Surgeons' (N=255) preferences were categorized into 4 technical decisions. Three out of the 4 technical decisions (repaired injuries together, double-layer closure, corner-stitches vs no corner-stitches) played a significant role in outcomes, P <0.05. Running versus interrupted did not affect outcomes. Motion analysis revealed significant differences in average operative times (leak: 6.67 min vs no leak: 8.88 min, P =0.0004) and work effort (leak-path length=36.86 cm vs no leak-path length=49.99 cm, P =0.001). Surgeons who took the riskiest path but did not leak had better bimanual dexterity (leak=0.21/1.0 vs no leak=0.33/1.0, P =0.047) and placed more sutures during the repair (leak=4.69 sutures vs no leak=6.09 sutures, P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that individual preferences affect technical decisions and play a significant role in procedural outcomes. Future analysis in more complex procedures may make major contributions to our understanding of contributors to procedure outcomes.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion in presidential leadership of academic medical and surgical societies.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to identify gender and racial disparities in presidential leadership for national medical and surgical organizations. METHODS: We located publicly sourced information on national medical organizations. Years between or since the first diverse presidents were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Mann Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Sixty-seven national medical and surgical organizations were surveyed. 70.8% (n = 34) diversified via gender first (White-female), whereas 26.1% (n = 14) had racial diversity first. Organizations with gender diversity first followed with an African American male president sooner than organizations who first diversified by race (14.7 ± 11.8 v. 27.6 ± 11.3 years, p = 0.018). No significant difference was observed for the third tier of diversification. CONCLUSIONS: Significant gender and racial leadership disparities in national medical organizations are still present. It is notable that organizations with female leaders had a shorter timeline to racial diversity. These findings help to inform strategies to promote and increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in national leadership.

Residents' surgical performance during the laboratory years: an analysis of rule-based errors.

BACKGROUND: Nearly one-third of surgical residents will enter into academic development during their surgical residency by dedicating time to a research fellowship for 1-3 y. Major interest lies in understanding how laboratory residents' surgical skills are affected by minimal clinical exposure during academic development. A widely held concern is that the time away from clinical exposure results in surgical skills decay. This study examines the impact of the academic development years on residents' operative performance. We hypothesize that the use of repeated, annual assessments may result in learning even without individual feedback on participants simulated performance. METHODS: Surgical performance data were collected from laboratory residents (postgraduate years 2-5) during the summers of 2014, 2015, and 2016. Residents had 15 min to complete a shortened, simulated laparoscopic ventral hernia repair procedure. Final hernia repair skins from all participants were scored using a previously validated checklist. An analysis of variance test compared the mean performance scores of repeat participants to those of first time participants. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (37% female) laboratory residents provided 2-year assessment data over the 3-year span of the study. Second time performance revealed improvement from a mean score of 14 (standard error = 1.0) in the first year to 17.2 (SD = 0.9) in the second year, (F[1, 52] = 5.6, P = 0.022). Detailed analysis demonstrated improvement in performance for 3 grading criteria that were considered to be rule-based errors. There was no improvement in operative strategy errors. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of longitudinal performance of laboratory residents shows higher scores for repeat participants in the category of rule-based errors. These findings suggest that laboratory residents can learn from rule-based mistakes when provided with annual performance-based assessments. This benefit was not seen with operative strategy errors and has important implications for using assessments not only for performance analysis but also as a learning experience.