Major Bleeding Postadministration of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase is a genetically engineered fibrinolytic with growing interest in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Compared to alteplase, tenecteplase is effective for neurologic improvement following ischemic stroke in patients with large vessel occlusions who are eligible for thrombectomy and for mild ischemic strokes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 0 to 5. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if safety outcomes are different in patients receiving tenecteplase and alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This retrospective cohort reviewed all patients who received alteplase or tenecteplase from January 2019 to December 2020. Patients admitted before April 28, 2020, received alteplase intravenous bolus over 1 minute followed by an infusion over 1 hour, for a total of 0.9 mg/kg. Patients admitted after this date received tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg as an intravenous bolus over 5 to 10 seconds. Any patient transferring from an outside facility was excluded. The primary outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in major bleeding between alteplase and tenecteplase (40 [18%] vs 21 [18.1%], P = 0.985). There was no significant difference in all-cause inpatient mortality for alteplase versus tenecteplase (10 [5%] vs 5 [4%], P = 0.934) or in adverse events between the groups (22 [9%] vs 14 [12%], P = 0.541) for alteplase and tenecteplase, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tenecteplase had similar rates of major bleeding versus alteplase and may be a reasonable alternative in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography Angiography: CINISter Study.

GOAL: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a well-tolerated, noninvasive study of the intracranial vascular circulation; however, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has been reported in 5%-7% of patients undergoing CTA. Limited studies have evaluated the risks of CIN in patients undergoing CTA. Our study was designed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for CIN in patients with ischemic stroke who receive a CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center, nested, case-control study of patients with ischemic stroke who received a CTA between June 18, 2012 and January 1, 2016. Patients were grouped based on development of CIN. FINDINGS: A total of 209 patients were included in the final analysis (178 controls, 31 cases). The prevalence of CIN during the time period studied was 14.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.2-20.2). A higher proportion of patients who developed CIN had a history of diabetes mellitus (37 [20.56%] versus 15 [48.39%]; P = .0009) and reported taking no medications prior to admission (35 [19.44%] versus 11 [35.48%]; P = .0458). However, a lower proportion of patients who developed CIN had a history of smoking (59 [32.78] versus 3 [9.68]; P = .0091). After statistical adjustment, only a history of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 4.15 [95% CI: 1.765, 9.754), taking no medications prior to admission (OR 3.56 [95% CI: 1.417, 8.941]) and a self-reported history of smoking (OR 0.204 [95% CI: 0.057, 0.721]) remained associated with the development of CIN. CONCLUSIONS: Those patients with a history of diabetes mellitus or not taking medications prior to admission should be monitored closely for the development of contrast-induced nephropathy CIN.

Thromboelastographic changes in patients experiencing an acute ischemic stroke and receiving alteplase.

BACKGROUND: Thromboelastography is a method of measuring whole-blood coagulation changes and has been used to guide therapy and monitor changes in a variety of disease states. However, few studies have investigated the thromboelastographic changes experienced in a patient who has received alteplase for an acute ischemic stroke. This pilot study sought to describe the effect of alteplase on the thromboelastogram tracings of patients experiencing an acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved prospective cohort study. Patients who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of acute ischemic stroke and received intravenous alteplase were evaluated for inclusion. Blood samples were obtained before alteplase administration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after alteplase administration. In addition, baseline variables collected included patient age, sex, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and the use of pretreatment anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. Patients were also followed throughout their hospital stay for development of intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, thromboelastogram parameters of all patients were within the normal range. The maximum inhibition of fibrin buildup was seen at 30 minutes after the start of alteplase infusion, and the lowest clot strength was observed at 60 minutes after initiation of alteplase. Most patients return to near baseline parameters within 150 minutes of alteplase initiation; however, 2 patients did not return to their baseline values within the 150-minute time frame. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that thromboelastogram (TEG) is a useful tool for determining changes in the coagulation system of patients whom have received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Further study is needed to determine if TEG can be used to predict those patients who may be at higher risk of adverse events because of rt-PA.