Grinding damage assessment on four high-strength ceramics.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess surface and subsurface damage on 4 CAD-CAM high-strength ceramics after grinding with diamond disks of 75 µm, 54 µm and 18 µm and to estimate strength losses based on damage crack sizes. METHODS: The materials tested were: 3Y-TZP (Lava), dense Al2O3 (In-Ceram AL), alumina glass-infiltrated (In-Ceram ALUMINA) and alumina-zirconia glass-infiltrated (In-Ceram ZIRCONIA). Rectangular specimens with 2 mirror polished orthogonal sides were bonded pairwise together prior to degrading the top polished surface with diamond disks of either 75 µm, 54 µm or 18 µm. The induced chip damage was evaluated on the bonded interface using SEM for chip depth measurements. Fracture mechanics were used to estimate fracture stresses based on average and maximum chip depths considering these as critical flaws subjected to tension and to calculate possible losses in strength compared to manufacturer's data. RESULTS: 3Y-TZP was hardly affected by grinding chip damage viewed on the bonded interface. Average chip depths were of 12.7±5.2 µm when grinding with 75 µm diamond inducing an estimated loss of 12% in strength compared to manufacturer's reported flexural strength values of 1100 MPa. Dense alumina showed elongated chip cracks and was suffering damage of an average chip depth of 48.2±16.3 µm after 75 µm grinding, representing an estimated loss in strength of 49%. Grinding with 54 µm was creating chips of 32.2±9.1 µm in average, representing a loss in strength of 23%. Alumina glass-infiltrated ceramic was exposed to chipping after 75 µm (mean chip size=62.4±19.3 µm) and 54 µm grinding (mean chip size=42.8±16.6 µm), with respectively 38% and 25% estimated loss in strength. Alumina-zirconia glass-infiltrated ceramic was mainly affected by 75 µm grinding damage with a chip average size of 56.8±15.1 µm, representing an estimated loss in strength of 34%. All four ceramics were not exposed to critical chipping at 18 µm diamond grinding. CONCLUSIONS: Reshaping a ceramic framework post sintering should be avoided with final diamond grits of 75 µm as a general rule. For alumina and the glass-infiltrated alumina, using a 54 µm diamond still induces chip damage which may affect strength. Removal of such damage from a reshaped framework is mandatory by using sequentially finer diamonds prior to the application of veneering ceramics especially in critical areas such as margins, connectors and inner surfaces.

Modulation of osteoblast behavior on TiNxOy coatings by altering the N/O stoichiometry while maintaining a high thrombogenic potential.

INTRODUCTION: Titanium nitride oxide (TiNxOy) coatings are known to stimulate osteoblast proliferation and osseointegration when compared to microrough titanium implants. The objectives of the present study were to determine whether the beneficial effects of TiNxOy coatings observed with implant osseointegration are dependent on N/O stoichiometry, with the final goal of optimizing these benefits. MMS: TiNxOy coatings with various N/O compositions were deposited on microrough titanium plates (Ti-SLA, 11 × 11 mm). Human primary osteoblast (hOBs) proliferation and gene expression were analyzed for a time course of three weeks, with or without additional stimulation by 1.25 (OH)2 vitamin D3 100 nM. Platelet adhesion/activation and thrombin generation were also assessed. RESULTS: hOBs proliferation gradually increased with the amount of oxygen contained in the coatings. The effect was observed from day 7 to reach a maximum at day 10, with a 1.8 fold increase for the best coating as compared to Ti-SLA. SEM views indicated that cells adhered, spread and elongated faster on oxygen-rich TiNxOy films, while the differentiation process as well as the thombogenic potential was not affected. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of TiNxOy coatings on osteoblast is dependent on their chemical composition; it increases with the amount of oxygen. TiNxOy coatings may act as a catalyst for cell-adhesion and proliferation early after seeding. In contrast, thrombogenicity of Ti-SLA surface is not affected by TiNxOy application.

Monotonic flexure and fatigue strength of composites for provisional and definitive restorations.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Ordinarily, the mechanical strength of composites is characterized by their flexural strength. Information as to the material's fatigue strength is seldom provided. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the flexural strength and the resistance to fatigue loading of composites and an acrylic resin for provisional and definitive restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Artglass, Colombus, and Targis (composites) and Jet, Protemp II, Protemp Garant, and Provipont DC (provisional restorations) were subjected to mechanical tests. Fatigue tests (MPa) (n = 30 specimens/group) were conducted with the rotating-bending cantilever design. Monotonic flexural strength (MPa) (n = 10) was determined in 3-point bending tests. Fatigue resistance was analyzed via the staircase procedure, and flexural strength was examined by use of the 2-parameter Weibull distribution (confidence intervals at 95%). RESULTS: The mean fatigue resistances (S(50)) in MPa +/- SD were: Targis, 62.1 +/- 7.0; Artglass, 58.5 +/- 3.7; Colombus, 54.6 +/- 6.2; Provipont DC, 29.5 +/- 3.2; Protemp II, 23.1 +/- 5.3; Jet, 22.8 +/- 8.3; Protemp Garant, 19.6 +/- 4.6. The flexure strengths (Weibull's S(0)) in MPa and their shape parameters (m) were: Colombus, 145.2 (13.1); Targis, 110.3 (7.8); Artglass, 5.9 (5.4); Jet, 150.9 (17.3); Provipont DC, 97.3 (23.8); Protemp II, 57.9 (6.4); Protemp Garant, 54.2 (12.8). The S(50) of Targis was significantly higher than that of Colombus but not different from Artglass. In flexion, the S(0) of Colombus was significantly higher than that of Artglass and Targis. The S(50) ranged between 40% and 60% of the S(0) for the composites and between 15% and 30% for the provisional restorative materials. CONCLUSIONS: Correlations between monotonic flexure strength and resistance to fatigue loading were weak. Because fatigue tests are considered more pertinent than monotonic tests as to their predictive value, it is concluded that flexure strength data alone may not provide relevant information for long-term clinical performance. The material's resistance to fatigue loading should also be determined.