Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(9): 1673-1682, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386750

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Locoregional recurrence of colon cancer (LRCC) following curative resection is an underreported clinical entity, especially regarding isolated LRCC which is amenable for surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on incidence of LRCC and surgical treatment with corresponding outcome, and to describe an institutional experience with curative-intent surgery, whether or not as part of a multimodality approach. METHODS: The PubMed and Medline literature databases 1978-2017 were searched and retrieved articles were assessed for eligibility. Based on a prospectively maintained database since 2010 at a tertiary referral center, original patient files were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Systematic literature review resulted in 11 studies reporting on incidence of LRCC, which ranged from 3.1% to 19.0% before 2010, and from 4.4% to 6.7% in three most recent studies. Twelve identified studies reported on outcome of surgically treated LRCC, with a median survival of 30 and 33 months in the two largest studies. The institutional database entailed 17 patients who underwent resection of isolated LRCC between 2010 and 2018. Median time to recurrence was 19 months. After a median follow-up after resection of LRCC of 20 months, 7 patients had died, 9 patients were alive without evidence of disease and 1 patient with evidence of disease; Median DFS was 36 months and 3-year OS was 65%. CONCLUSION: Locoregional recurrence of colon cancer occurs in about 5% in most recent series, of whom selected patients are eligible for surgical treatment, with a fair chance of long-term disease control.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Mesocolo/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
Tech Coloproctol ; 23(8): 723-728, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31432336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During creation of a pedicled omentoplasty, blood flow to segments of the omentum might become compromised. If unrecognized, this can lead to omental necrosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential added intra-operative value of the use of fluorescence angiography (FA) with indocyanine green (ICG) to assess omental perfusion. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing a pedicled omentoplasty in a 6-month period (April 1 2018-October 1 2018) in a University hospital were included. The primary outcome was change in management due to FA. Secondary outcomes included the amount of additionally resected omentum, added surgical time, and quantitative fluorescent values (time to fluorescent enhancement, contrast quantification). RESULTS: Fifteen patients had pelvic surgery with omentoplasty and FA. Change in management occurred in 12 patients (80%) and consisted of resecting a median of 44 g (range 12-198 g) of poorly perfused omental areas that were not visible by conventional white light. The median added surgical time for the use of FA and subsequent management was 8 min (range 3-39 min). The first fluorescent signal in the omental tissue appeared after a median of 20 s (range 9-37 s) after injection of ICG. The median signal-to-baseline ratio was 23.7 (interquartile range 12.2-29.7) in well perfused and 2.5 (interquartile range 1.7-4.0) in poorly perfused tissue. CONCLUSIONS: FA of a pedicled omentoplasty allows a real-time assessment of omental perfusion and leads to change in management in 80% of the cases in this pilot study. These findings support the conduct of larger studies to determine the impact on patient outcome in this setting.


Assuntos
Angiofluoresceinografia/métodos , Raios Infravermelhos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Omento/irrigação sanguínea , Doenças Peritoneais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Corantes , Feminino , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Omento/diagnóstico por imagem , Omento/cirurgia , Pelve/cirurgia , Doenças Peritoneais/diagnóstico por imagem , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Br J Surg ; 105(6): 637-644, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29493785

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ileostomy construction is a common procedure but can be associated with morbidity. The stoma is commonly secured to the skin using transcutaneous sutures. It is hypothesized that intracutaneous sutures result in a tighter adherence of the peristomal skin to the stoma plate to prevent faecal leakage. The study aimed to compare the effect of intracutaneous versus transcutaneous suturing of ileostomies on faecal leakage and quality of life. METHODS: This randomized trial was undertaken in 11 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients scheduled to receive an ileostomy for any reason were randomized to intracutaneous or transcutaneous suturing (IC and TC groups respectively). The primary outcome was faecal leakage. Secondary outcomes were stoma-related quality of life and costs of stoma-related materials and reinterventions. RESULTS: Between April 2011 and February 2016, 339 patients were randomized to the IC (170) or TC (169) group. Leakage rates were higher in the IC than in the TC group (52·4 versus 41·4 per cent respectively; risk difference 11·0 (95 per cent c.i. 0·3 to 21·2) per cent). Skin irritation rates were high (78·2 versus 72·2 per cent), but did not differ significantly between the groups (risk difference 6·1 (95 per cent c.i. -3·2 to 15·10) per cent). There were no significant differences in quality of life or costs between the groups. CONCLUSION: Intracutaneous suturing of an ileostomy is associated with more peristomal leakage than transcutaneous suturing. Overall stoma-related complications did not differ between the two techniques. Registration number: NTR2369 ( http://www.trialregister.nl).


Assuntos
Ileostomia/métodos , Estomas Cirúrgicos , Técnicas de Sutura , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos , Feminino , Humanos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estomas Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...