Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Healthy Class III Patients Treated With Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The study purpose was to assess whether mandibular setback surgery by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) induces obstructive apnea and hypopnea in healthy Class III patients without a history of respiratory dysfunction. We hypothesized that the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) would not exceed 5 events per hour after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. The sample was composed of healthy Class III patients without a history of obstructive sleep apnea treated with isolated mandibular setback surgery by the IVRO procedure at a university hospital. In-home respiratory sleep recordings (Nox T3; Nox Medical, Reykjavik, Iceland) and self-administered questionnaires were obtained before and at least 3 months after surgery. The AHI was the primary outcome variable. Other study variables were as follows: peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, oxygen desaturation index, snore index, body mass index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Oral Impact on Daily Performance index. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed, and the significance level was set at .05. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 8 patients. The mean age at surgery was 23.2 years (range, 18.2 to 33.4 years). The mean amount of surgical setback was 4.3 mm (range, 2.5 to 7.4 mm). The mean body mass index was 24.2 kg/m2 (standard error [SE], 1.3 kg/m2) and 23.9 kg/m2 (SE, 1.4 kg/m2) at the presurgical and postsurgical sleep recordings, respectively. The mean AHI was 1.3 events per hour (SE, 0.3; range, 0.1 to 2.5) before surgery and 1.8 events per hour (SE, 0.4; range, 0.3 to 3.3) after surgery. No statistically significant changes in AHI (P = .412), peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (P = .443), oxygen desaturation index (P = .194), snore index (P = .363), or Epworth Sleepiness Scale (P = .812) were observed. The patients' self-reported oral health-related quality of life was statistically significantly improved after surgery (P = .034). CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular setback surgery with the IVRO procedure in the range of 2.5 to 7.4 mm did not induce obstructive sleep apnea, measured as an AHI above 5 events per hour, in the 8 healthy, young adult Class III patients presented in this study. More studies including larger patient samples are needed.

Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: A retrospective evaluation was performed of dentoalveolar and skeletal stability 1 year after mandibular setback surgery using intraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy (IVSO) combined with intermaxillary fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (16 men, 12 women) with skeletal Angle Class III malocclusions were included. Mean age at start of treatment was 23.9 years. All patients underwent combined surgical and orthodontic treatment. Dental casts and cephalometric measurements were performed for each patient before orthodontic treatment and at 8 weeks and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Treatment changes from 8 weeks to 1 year after surgery were small but significant for the angular relationship between the maxilla and the mandible in the sagittal plane (ANB) (mean difference, -0.5 mm; P = .021), Wits appraisal (mean difference, -0.7 mm; P = .044), the inclination of the mandible in relation to the nasion-sella line (ML-NSL) (mean difference, -0.8 mm; P = .010), and the inclination of the lower incisors in relation to the nasion-point B line (Li-NB) (mean difference, -0.6 mm; P < .001). These findings for cephalometric values indicated a small skeletal relapse in sagittal and vertical relations. No significant dentoalveolar relapse occurred according to the dental cast evaluations. CONCLUSION: The results clearly show that orthodontic treatment combined with IVSO provides a stable dental and skeletal result 1 year after treatment.

Patients' perceptions of improvements after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery: 10 to 14 years of follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to determine reasons for orthodontic-surgical treatment, to quantify the perceptions of possible improvement 10 to 14 years after treatment, and to assess factors that affect treatment satisfaction and socio-dental impacts on quality of life. METHODS: The participation rate was 36 of 78 patients; their mean age was 45.7 years (SD, 10.7 years; range, 29-62 years). The presurgical anatomic occlusions were measured on dental casts. Visual analog scales allowed the participants to rate their perceived treatment outcome on 7 oral health-related items. A 3-point scale rated satisfaction with orthodontic-surgical treatment. The oral impact of daily performances index was included to assess socio-dental impacts on quality of life. RESULTS: Most responders reported improvements on the 7 items. The most significant change was reported for chewing. "Very satisfied" with the treatment was reported by 13 responders; 19 of 36 persons were "reasonably satisfied." Reporting "very satisfied with treatment" was 8 times more likely when peers had noticed a changed in the participant's appearance after surgery. Sex was significantly associated with quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently reported reason for treatment was to improve chewing, and the item that showed the most pronounced improvement was also chewing. Most responders were only reasonably satisfied with the treatment. Whether peers noticed a change in appearance after treatment was a significant factor affecting both treatment satisfaction and reporting a good quality of life.

Dental or skeletal relapse after sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery? Long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short- and long-term stability of mandibular advancement surgery with sagittal split osteotomy (SSO), and to investigate when relapse occurs and identify variables contributing to relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with Class II anomalies were included; the mean age at surgery was 33.0 years. All underwent SSO surgery and clinical and radiologic follow-up at 8 weeks, 1 year, and 13 years. Model analysis, cephalometric analysis, and clinical examinations were performed at each control. RESULTS: Mean overjet relapse from 8 weeks to 13 years was 2.3 mm (range, 0 to 7.0 mm). Between 8 weeks and 1 year, mean overjet relapse was 0.6 mm (range, -1.0 to 4.0 mm), and it was 1.7 mm (range, -1.0 to 6.0 mm) between 1 year and 13 years. Overjet relapse greater than 4 mm was found in 13.9% of the patients. Mean overjet 1 year after surgery was 2.6 mm and was significantly increased compared with 8 weeks (P = .006). Mean overjet 13 years after surgery was 4.3 mm and was significantly increased compared with 1 year (P < .001). Inferior incisor line to nasion-B-point was 29.0° at 8 weeks after surgery and 25.4° at 13 years (P = .001). Insignificant changes in the other cephalometric variables were found at follow-up. CONCLUSION: SSO advancement surgery is a relatively stable technique over time. Mean overjet relapse was found to be 2.3 mm after 13 years, following a continuous pattern over time. The cephalometric variables showed insignificant changes during follow-up, indicating that relapses are mainly of dental and not skeletal origin.

Changes in root length during orthodontic treatment: advantages for immature teeth.

The purpose of the study was to investigate root lengthening during orthodontic treatment in relation to the age of the patient, the developmental stage of the root, and the anticipated growth. Specifically, the potential benefit of treating young teeth was addressed. The sample consisted of 80 patients with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions, treated with extraction of at least two maxillary first premolars, and edgewise technique with 0.018-inch slot brackets. Additionally, a cross-sectional control group of 66 untreated individuals matched to gender, and pre- and post-treatment age of the experimental group was included. Crown and root lengths of the maxillary incisors were measured on peri-apical radiographs before and after treatment, and corrected for image distortion. The stage of root development before treatment was recorded. Root elongation during treatment was found for 50 out of the 280 examined teeth. Age at treatment start was significantly higher among the patients showing root shortening of the lateral incisors during treatment than among those showing root elongation (P < 0.05). The stage of root development was significantly related to the direction of root length change, i.e. shortening or elongation. Roots elongated during treatment did not differ in length from untreated teeth of similarly aged individuals. There was no significant difference in the extent of root lengthening between the roots elongated during treatment and the normal root lengthening in age-matched untreated individuals. Post-treatment root length was significantly related to pre-treatment age. Roots that were incompletely developed before treatment reached a significantly greater length than those that were fully developed at the start of treatment. The results of this study show a definite advantage for younger teeth with regard to post-treatment root length. This finding may influence treatment planning strategy.