A mixed method study exploring gender differences in dementia caregiving.

Few studies have investigated the experience of male carers of people with dementia and fewer specifically examined whether male and female carers of people with dementia differ in their approach to the caring role. As such, this research set-out to investigate whether male carers of people with dementia approach the caring role differently to female carers. Data from 167 survey participants (24 males and 143 females) were analysed using a mixed research methodology. Participants' demographics and scores on standardised burden and coping scales were analysed using linear regression. Participants' written responses to open-ended questions were analysed using thematic analysis anchored in theories of hegemonic masculinity. No significant gender differences were identified in carers' coping strategies or self-reported carer burden. However, qualitative analysis revealed strong thematic gender differences like: gendered barriers to help-seeking; gendered service preference; gendered considerations about residential care; gendered expression of burden; and themes of the absent son and exhausted daughter. This research identified that male carers of people with dementia approach help-seeking differently to female carers, typically focusing on addressing functional tasks and refraining from showing emotions, this despite reporting similar carer burden. Rapport building with male carers should start with conversations around functional issues rather than assessing the emotional impact of the caring role. The findings reinforce the need for more qualitative research into the unmet needs of male carers of people with dementia, to inform the design of male-friendly interventions which could facilitate timely access to services by male carers.

Players', parents' and staffs' perceptions of injury prevention exercise programmes in youth rugby union.

Background and aim: Despite evidence of their efficacy, there is no widespread adoption of injury prevention exercise programmes (IPEPs) among young players and coaches in community rugby union. The purpose of this study was to (1) analyse the knowledge and perceptions of injury prevention and IPEPs among staff, parents and players in youth rugby union and (2) explore the facilitators and barriers to implementation of IPEPs. With this contextual information, tailored implementation strategies can be created. Methods: Participants completed an online survey addressing knowledge and perceptions of injury risk, injury prevention practices and a rugby-specific IPEP. Community rugby union players aged 14-18 years, their parents and staff were invited to participate, including school-based and development squads competing at a national level. Results: Surveys were completed by 18 staff members, 72 parents and 56 players. Staff, parents and players believe that the risk of injury in youth rugby union is high and that injury prevention is important. The perceived role in injury prevention and availability of allied health staff, particularly strength and conditioning coaches, was apparent in this sample. Reported barriers to completion of IPEPs related to time, resources, awareness of the programme and end-users' attitudes or motivations. Leadership, the use of role models and the structure and routine provided by an IPEP were considered facilitative. Conclusions: These findings inform future implementation strategies for IPEPs in this setting, including the need to provide practical solutions, education and considering the role of allied health staff in facilitating such programmes.

Optimizing the Care and Management of Older Offenders: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The rapid increase in the number of older offenders in many countries presents unique challenges to both correctional and health care systems. In the absence of strong empirical evidence on effective interventions, identifying best practices can help optimize the care and management of this segment of the prisoner population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of care models, prison programs, and different interventions designed to improve the care and management of older offenders. We searched 5 bibliographic databases and other data sources including OpenGrey, agency documents, and government reports published until December 2020. This review employed commonly used steps for conducting a scoping review and applied additional tools to enhance the methodology. RESULTS: After title and abstract screening and full-text review, a total of 34 studies were included in the analysis. Four themes emerged from the review: (a) institutional logics, (b) adaptations, (c) multidisciplinary teams, and (d) person-centered care and management. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Best practices identified in this review can help optimize the care and management of older offenders in mainstream prisons. Further action research is recommended to adapt and scale up the interventions.