Potential Crosstalk between the PACAP/VIP Neuropeptide System and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Relevance to Multiple Sclerosis Pathophysiology.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by focal demyelination and chronic inflammation of the central nervous system (CNS). Although the exact etiology is unclear, mounting evidence indicates that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress represents a key event in disease pathogenesis. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) are two structurally related neuropeptides that are abundant in the CNS and are known to exert neuroprotective and immune modulatory roles. Activation of this endogenous neuropeptide system may interfere with ER stress processes to promote glial cell survival and myelin self-repair. However, the potential crosstalk between the PACAP/VIP system and ER stress remains elusive. In this review, we aim to discuss how these peptides ameliorate ER stress in the CNS, with a focus on MS pathology. Our goal is to emphasize the importance of this potential interaction to aid in the identification of novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of MS and other demyelinating disorders.

The interaction of steroids with phospholipid bilayers and membranes.

Steroids are critical for various physiological processes and used to treat inflammatory conditions. Steroids act by two distinct pathways. The genomic pathway is initiated by the steroid binding to nuclear receptors while the non-genomic pathway involves plasma membrane receptors. It has been proposed that steroids might also act in a more indirect mechanism by altering biophysical properties of membranes. Yet, little is known about the effect of steroids on membranes, and steroid-membrane interactions are complex and challenging to characterise. The focus of this review is to outline what is currently known about the interactions of steroids with phospholipid bilayers and illustrate the complexity of these systems using cortisone and progesterone as the main examples. The combined findings from current work demonstrate that the hydrophobicity and planarity of the steroid core does not provide a consensus for steroid-membrane interactions. Even small differences in the substituents on the steroid core can result in significant changes in steroid-membrane interactions. Furthermore, steroid-induced changes in phospholipid bilayer properties are often dependent on steroid concentration and lipid composition. This complexity means that currently there is insufficient information to establish a reliable structure-activity relationship to describe the effect of steroids on membrane properties. Future work should address the challenge of connecting the findings from studying the effect of steroids on phospholipid bilayers to cell membranes. Insights from steroid-membrane interactions will benefit our understanding of normal physiology and assist drug development.