The seventh cervical vertebra is an appropriate landmark for thoracic kyphosis measures using distance from the wall.

Background: Hyperkyphosis is frequently found nowadays due to the change in current lifestyles and age-related system decline. A simple hyperkyphosis measurement can be made easily using the perpendicular distance from the landmark to the wall. However, the existing evidence applied two different landmarks [occiput and the seventh cervical vertebra (C7)] and the measurement using rulers was susceptible to error due to their misalignment. Objective: To assess an appropriate landmark for thoracic kyphosis measurement using distance from the wall (KMD), by comparing between occiput and C7, as measured using rulers and verified using data from a specially developed machine, the so-called infrared-gun kyphosis wall distance tool (IG-KypDisT), and the Cobb angles. Methods: Community-dwelling individuals with a risk of thoracic hyperkyphosis (age ≥10 years, n=43) were cross-sectionally assessed for their thoracic hyperkyphosis using the perpendicular distance from the landmarks, occiput and C7, to the wall using rulers and IG-KypDisT. Then the Cobb angles of these participants were measured within seven days. Results: The outcomes from both landmarks differed by approximately 0.8 cm (p= 0.084). The outcomes derived from C7 were more reliable (ICCs>0.93, p<0.001), with greater concurrent validity with the radiologic data (r= 0.738, p<0.001), with the overall variance predicted by the regression models for the Cobb angles being higher than that from the occiput (47-48% from C7 and 38-39% from occiput). The outcomes derived from rulers and IG-KypDisT showed no significant differences. Conclusion: The present findings support the reliability and validity of KMD assessments at C7 using rulers as a simple standard measure of thoracic hyperkyphosis that can be used in various clinical, community, and research settings.

Walking speed to determine walking performance of people with mobility limitations from a developing country.

BACKGROUND: The criteria to determine walking performance of people with mobility limitations from developed countries have been already reported. However, these criteria may not be suitable to be applied for people with mobility limitations from developing countries due to the differences in sociodemographic characteristics and environmental conditions. OBJECTIVE: To explore cutoff points of walking speed to determine walking performance of individuals with mobility limitations from a developing country. METHODS: Individuals with mobility limitations from a developing country (n = 136) were cross-sectionally interviewed and assessed for their demographics and walking performance. Then they were assessed for their walking speed using the 10-meter walk test. RESULTS: Walking speeds of ≥0.30 m/s, ≥ 0.40 m/s, and ≥0.65 m/s could optimally indicate the ability of outside-home walking, limited-community walking, and full-community walking, respectively (sensitivity = 78%-84%, specificity = 81%-93%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] > 0.90). Moreover, a walking speed of ≥0.35 m/s could suggest the ability of functional walking (sensitivity = 78%; specificity = 83%; and AUC = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: With the need of standard practical measure for early screening and monitoring of functional alteration over time, the present walking speed cutoff points may be clinically applied to suggest walking performance in daily living specifically for individuals with mobility limitations from a developing country.

The Use of a Single-Time Sit-To-Stand Test in Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury by Primary Health Care Providers.

Background: The uncertain health care situations, such as that created by the COVID-19 pandemic, has limited hospital access and facilitated a paradigm shift in health care toward an increased demand for standard home visits and community-based rehabilitation services, including by ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Objectives: This 6-month prospective study explored the validity and reliability of a single-time sit-to-stand (STSTS) test when used by primary health care (PHC) providers, including a village health volunteer, caregiver, individual with SCI, and health professional. Methods: Eighty-two participants were assessed for the STSTS using four arm placement conditions (arms on a walking device, arms on knees, arms free by the sides, and arms crossed over the chest) and standard measures, with prospective fall data follow-up over 6 months. Thirty participants involved in the reliability study were also assessed and reassessed for the ability to complete the STSTS conditions by PHC providers. Results: Outcomes of the STSTS test, except the condition with arms on a walking device, could significantly discriminate lower extremity muscle strength (LEMS) and mobility of the participants (rpb = -0.58 to 0.69) with moderate concurrent validity. Outcomes of the tests without using the arms also showed moderate to almost-perfect reliability (kappa = 0.754-1.000) when assessed by PHC raters. Conclusion: The findings suggest the use of an STSTS with arms free by the sides as a standard practical measure by PHC providers to reflect LEMS and mobility of ambulatory individuals with SCI in various clinical, community, and home-based settings.

Validity and feasibility of a seated push-up test to indicate skeletal muscle mass in well-functioning older adults.

INTRODUCTION: Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is a major component of the human body (> 30% of the body-weight) and plays crucial role in many bodily functions. However, SMM assessments require a complex and costly machine, which delays the ability to detect abnormalities related to SMM decline and, subsequently, reduces the effectiveness of the clinical management of older adults. PURPOSE: This study aimed to: 1) assess the correlation between upper limb loading during a seated push-up test (ULL-SPUT) and SMM (concurrent validity); 2) compare the SMM of participants who passed and failed a seated push-up test (SPUT; discriminant validity); and 3) explore the ability of a failed SPUT to identify older individuals with low SMM. METHODS: Participants (n = 40, age approximately 73 years) were cross-sectionally assessed for their SMM using a portable bioelectrical impedance analysis, and SPUTs were evaluated using digital push-up loading devices that were the size of clinical push-up boards, in three starting positions: 1) high; 2) ring, and 3) long sitting positions. RESULTS: The ULL-SPUT, especially in a ring sitting position, was significantly correlated to SMM (rs = 0.457-0.608, p < .005). The SMM and ULL-SPUT were significantly different between participants who passed and failed the SPUT (p < .05). Failure to complete the SPUT - that is, being unable to lift the body up from the floor during the test - showed an excellent ability to indicate participants with an SMM of < 28% of their body-weight (sensitivity > 83%, specificity > 82%, area under the curve = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The inability to lift the body up from the floor during sitting using the upper limbs can be used as a screening tool to indicate those with low SMM. Such a simple screening measure may enhance the distribution of healthcare services across various community- and home-based settings, particularly during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, when hospital services are limited for many individuals, including older adults.

Reference Values and Cutoff Scores of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III to Determine Independence for Wheelchair Users and Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the reference values and optimal cutoff scores of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Version III (SCIM III) to indicate independence of wheelchair users (WU) and ambulatory (AM) individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary rehabilitation center and communities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 309 (168 WU and 141 AM) participants with SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): SCIM III scores. RESULTS: Participants with greater levels of independence had significantly higher SCIM III scores, both total and subitem scores (P<.05). The SCIM III scores of ≥55 and ≥75 were optimal indicators of modified independence in WU and AM individuals, respectively (sensitivity and specificity >93%, AUC>.95). In addition, scores of 90 were proved to be excellent indicators for independence of AM individuals (sensitivity 94%, specificity 100%, AUC=.99). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings provide the reference values of SCIM III scores covering WU and AM individuals with SCI at various levels of independence as well as optimal cutoff scores to indicate independence of these individuals. These data can be used as standard criteria for data comparison with patients' ability, and target functional values for individuals with SCI in clinical-, community-, and home-based settings.

Ability to detect history of falls among individuals with spinal cord injury using upper limb loading during a seated push-up test.

BACKGROUND: A history of falls is an important risk factor for future falls, including for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who often experience falls and subsequent injuries. This may be even more pronounced during the current COVID-19 pandemic because of the extreme shortage of hospital admission and restricted access to important services. Therefore, the ability of detecting a history of falls that can be applied to wheelchair users and ambulatory individuals with SCI in various settings are essential. AIM: To investigate the discriminative ability of three clinical measures-the handgrip (HG) test, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III and Upper Limb Loading During a Seated Push-Up Test (ULL-SPUT)-in discriminating individuals with SCI with and without a history of falls over the past six months. DESIGN: A 6-month retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient tertiary rehabilitation center. POPULATION: One hundred and fourteen wheelchair users and ambulatory individuals with SCI. METHODS: The participants were interviewed and assessed for their demographics, SCI characteristics and fall data over the past six months, with data confirmation from related events, their caregivers and medical records. Subsequently, they were assessed using the HG test, SCIM III, and ULL-SPUT. RESULTS: In total, 29 participants (25%) fell during the past six months (with the number of falls ranging from 1-20, with minor consequences after the falls). Among the three clinical measures assessed in this study, the ULL-SPUT data of faller participants were significantly higher than those of non-fallers (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The limited rehabilitation length and increased staying home and social isolation prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced the fall rates of the participants. The findings suggest a higher likelihood of falls among wheelchair users and ambulatory individuals with SCI who have good mobility as determined using ULL-SPUT data. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Apart from being an important rehabilitation strategy, the present findings suggest an additional benefit of ULL-SPUT to identify individuals with SCI with a likelihood of future falls. The measurement can be done easily using digital bathroom scales placing over a flat and smooth surface. Therefore, it would enable the timely initiation of fall prevention strategies in various clinical, community, home and research settings; particularly in this COVID-19 pandemic of limited beds and hospital services for these individuals.

Validity and reliability of the block method for measuring thoracic hyperkyphosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity of the block method as compared with the gold standard (Cobb's method). An additional aim was to examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of expert and novice assessors using the block method. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we enrolled 62 participants with hyperkyphosis aged ≥10 years, with hyperkyphosis defined as one or more blocks. The participants were stratified by age (<60 years and ≥60 years). To determine concurrent validity, and kyphosis was assessed in all the participants using the block method and Cobb's method. Finally, 15 participants were included in a reliability study. To determine intra- and inter-rater reliability, each participant was assessed twice, 7 days apart, by one expert and one novice using the block method. RESULTS: The concurrent validity of the block method and gold standard method showed moderate correlation (rs = 0.53, P < .001). However, after stratifying the participants by age (<60 years and ≥60 years), there was small to moderate correlation (rs = 0.42, P = .006, and rs = 0.64, P = .002, respectively). The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the expert and novice assessors was excellent (ICC3,1 = 0.82-0.97, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed small correlation in those <60 and moderate correlation in those ≥60 years, and reported excellent reliability. The block method can be used by novices with strong reliability. This method is a practical technique for early screening hyperkyphosis in the elderly.

The use of simple muscle strength tests to reflect body compositions among individuals with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between simple muscle strength tests (including handgrip test and upper limb loading during a seated push-up test [ULL-SPUT]) and body compositions among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: A tertiary rehabilitation center. METHODS: Twenty-four participants with SCI (average age of 40 years) were cross-sectionally assessed using handgrip test, ULL-SPUT, and body compositions (including skeletal muscle mass, bone mineral content, and fat mass) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. RESULTS: The handgrip data had low-to-moderate correlation to body compositions of the arms (rs = 0.474-0.515, p < 0.05), while the ULL-SPUT data were low-to-excellently correlated to all body compositions of the arms, legs, and trunk (rs, r = 0.467-0.921, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings extend clinical benefit of a SPUT apart from being a rehabilitation strategy to promote mobility of individuals with SCI. Simple measurement of the ULL-SPUT, which can be done using digital bathroom scales placed on a hard and even surface, appears to be strongly correlated with body compositions in a small sample of predominantly middle age, normal weight, men with paraplegia. More research is required to understand whether this test can be used clinically to assess body compositions in a more diverse SCI population, and whether it is responsive to changes in body compositions over time.

Is the occiput-wall distance valid and reliable to determine the presence of thoracic hyperkyphosis?

BACKGROUND: Hyperkyphosis may be frequently found nowadays due to the change in current lifestyles of sustained flexion postures and age-related system decline. The occiput-wall distance (OWD) is a practical measure that is commonly used to screen and monitor thoracic hyperkyphosis in epidemiologic studies. However, there was no clear evidence to support the clinical utility of the tool as compared to the data from direct standard measures. OBJECTIVES: To investigate psychometric properties-including validity, reliability, and appropriate cut-off point-of the OWD to determine the presence of thoracic hyperkyphosis, as compared to a standard Cobb's method. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: This study was conducted in ninety-nine participants, aged 10 years and above who had different degrees of thoracic hyperkyphosis from several communities. All participants were assessed for their severity of thoracic hyperkyphosis using the OWD, and 14 participants were involved in a reliability study. Within 7 days later, all participants were at a hospital to complete a radiographic examination. RESULTS: Outcomes from OWD had good concurrent validity with the Cobb angles (r = 0.683, P < 0.001) and excellent rater reliability when assessed by well-trained health professionals (ICCs > 0.9, P < 0.001). The OWD of at least 6.5 cm had the best diagnostic properties to determine the presence of thoracic hyperkyphosis (sensitivity = 71.4%, specificity = 76.6%, and area under the curve = 0.846). CONCLUSION: The findings support validity and reliability of OWD, and offer a clear cut-off point to determine the presence of thoracic hyperkyphosis for clinical utility in various settings.

Reliability of novice physiotherapists for measuring Cobb angle using a digital method.

BACKGROUND: The Cobb's method is the most accurate and reliable method for kyphosis measurement. Conventionally, a sagittal Cobb angle was commonly derived from a lateral plain film. With computer technology, a digital method is widely used in common clinical settings, but the existing reliability data involved only experienced raters. OBJECTIVES: To assess the interrater and intrarater reliability of a digital Cobb's method using novice physiotherapists. METHODS: Fifteen participants, with an occiput wall distance of more than 0 cm, were interviewed and assessed for their demographics. Then they were filmed for lateral spinal radiography over the area of thoracic spine in a standing position, and the Cobb angle was analyzed by four raters, including an expert physician and three novice physiotherapists, using a SurgimapSpine programme. RESULTS: The average Cobb angles among the four raters showed no significant difference (p = 0.984). Outcomes of their measurements had excellent intrarater and interrater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,3) = 0.995-0.997] with a small range of standard errors of the measurement (<1°). CONCLUSION: A digital Cobb's method had excellent reliability when used by a novice health professional rater. The findings confirm the ease of using this method to detect and monitor kyphosis in general hospitals, clinics, or research facilities.