Studying mucin secretion from human bronchial epithelial cell primary cultures.

Mucin secretion is regulated by extracellular signaling molecules emanating from local, neuronal, or endocrine sources. Quantifying the rate of this secretion is important to understanding how the exocytic process is regulated, and also how goblet/mucous cells synthesize and release mucins under control and pathological conditions. Consequently, measuring mucins in a quantitatively accurate manner is the key to many experiments addressing these issues. This paper describes procedures used to determine agonist-induced mucin secretion from goblet cells in human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cell cultures. It begins with primary epithelial cell culture, offers methods for purifying MUC5AC and MUC5B mucins for standards, and describes five different microtiter plate binding assays which use various probes for mucins. A polymeric mucin-specific antibody is used in standard and sandwich ELISA formats for two assays while the others target the extensive glycosylated domains of mucins with lectin, periodate oxidation, and antibody-based probes. Comparing the data derived from the different assays applied to the same set of samples of HBE cell cultures indicates a qualitative agreement between baseline and agonist stimulated mucin release; however, the polymeric mucin-specific assays yield substantially lower values than the assays using non-specific molecular reporters. These results indicate that the more nonspecific assays are suitable to assess overall secretory responses by goblet cells, but are likely unsuited for specific measurements of polymeric mucins, per se.

The receptor mechanism mediating the contractile response to adenosine on lung parenchymal strips from actively sensitised, allergen-challenged Brown Norway rats.

Parenchymal strips prepared from lungs removed from actively sensitised Brown Norway rats challenged with allergen show hyperresponsiveness to adenosine. The response is mast cell mediated and a preliminary pharmacological analysis suggested the involvement of a receptor (or receptors) that could not be classified as any of the known adenosine receptor subtypes. We present a further analysis of the response. Male Brown Norway (BN) rats, actively sensitised to ovalbumin (OA), were challenged intratracheally with OA and killed 3 h later to provide parenchymal strip preparations. The augmented contractile responses to adenosine were partially blocked by the 5-HT receptor antagonist, methysergide, or the A(1) receptor antagonist, DPCPX, and abolished in the presence of both antagonists. Responses to high concentrations of the A(1) receptor agonist, CPA were, like those to adenosine, augmented on tissues from allergen-challenged animals and blocked by a combination of methysergide and DPCPX. The A(3) receptor agonist, Cl-IB-MECA, did not contract the tissue, but partially blocked the response to adenosine. A combination of Cl-IB-MECA and methysergide induced a similar degree of blockade to that seen with either drug given alone. Combination of Cl-IB-MECA and/or methysergide with DPCPX abolished the response to adenosine. The effects of the A(3) receptor agonist, inosine, were augmented on tissues from allergen-challenged animals and markedly inhibited by disodium cromoglycate, methysergide or Cl-IB-MECA. Responses to adenosine were abolished when parenchymal strips were taken from rats pretreated 48 h previously with pertussis toxin. 8-SPT, CGS 15943, XAC, MRS 1754, DPCPX and theophylline, at concentrations which inhibit the A(1) A(2A) and/or A(2B) receptors but have negligible affinity for the rat A(3) receptor, inhibited responses to adenosine, but high concentrations were required and blockade was incomplete. MRS 1523 and MRS 1191, which are antagonists at the rat A(3) receptor, had no effect on the response to adenosine. The present results support and clarify our earlier conclusion that an atypical receptor mechanism mediates contraction of the parenchymal strip prepared from the lungs of actively sensitised BN rats challenged with allergen to adenosine. The response arises from a combined effect of adenosine on the A(1) receptor and a receptor with similarities to the A(3) receptor, but where Cl-IB-MECA behaves as an antagonist and MRS 1523 and MRS 1191 are inactive at concentrations that substantially exceed their affinities for the rat A(3) receptor.

Interaction between adenosine and allergen or compound 48/80 on lung parenchymal strips from actively sensitized Brown Norway rats.

We have investigated the effect of mast cell activation induced by immunological and non-immunological stimuli on the sensitivity to adenosine of parenchymal strips prepared from lungs removed from Brown Norway (BN) rats actively sensitized to ovalbumin. Strips responded to ovalbumin with a biphasic contractile response. Responses to adenosine were markedly increased 30 min after ovalbumin. The first phase of the response to ovalbumin was abolished by the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2 receptor antagonist, methysergide and unaffected by the cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, iralukast. The second phase was abolished by iralukast and unaffected by methysergide. The response to adenosine was markedly reduced by methysergide but not significantly altered by iralukast. Compound 48/80 (condensation product of N-methyl-p-methoxyphenylethylamine with formaldehyde) induced methysergide-sensitive contractions of the parenchymal strip and potentiated adenosine; the augmented response to adenosine was blocked by methysergide. Thus, activation of mast cells in the lung by either immunological or non-immunological stimuli results in augmentation of the mast cell-mediated contractile response to adenosine.

Antagonist pharmacology of adenosine A2B receptors from rat, guinea pig and dog.

We have sought evidence for species differences between adenosine A2B receptors by comparing the potencies of eight adenosine receptor antagonists, representing four different chemical classes, at the native adenosine A2B receptors which mediate relaxation of smooth muscle from rat colon, guinea pig aorta and dog saphenous vein. In all three assays, the antagonists caused parallel rightward shifts in the concentration-response curves to NECA and there was no depression of the maximum responses. There were highly significant correlations between the pKB values on each of the three receptors. However, the pKB values of 8-SPT (8-p-(sulphophenyl)theophylline), XAC (8-[-[[[[(2-aminoethyl)amino]-carbonyl]methyl]oxy]phenyl]-1,3-dipropylxanthine), CGS 15943 (9-chloro-2,2-(furanyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolin-5-amine) and CGH 2473 N-[4-(3,4-dichloro-phenyl)-5-pyridin-4-yl-thiazol-2-yl]-acetamide) for the dog receptor exceeded by at least 0.5 log units the pKB values at the rat and guinea pig sites. Our data indicate species differences between the rat and guinea pig adenosine A2B receptors on the one hand and the dog adenosine A2B receptor on the other with respect to antagonist pharmacology.