Development and nationwide implementation of a postdischarge responsive parenting intervention program for very preterm born children: The TOP program.

A previous randomized controlled trial has suggested the effectiveness of a Dutch postdischarge responsive parenting program for very preterm (VPT) infants, indicating that nationwide implementation was justified. This paper describes the development and nationwide implementation of the intervention, known as the TOP program, which consisted of three phases. In the preparation phase (2006-2010), a theory of change and the structure of the TOP program were developed, and funding for phase two, based on a positive Business Case, was obtained. In the pilot implementation phase (2010-2014), intervention strategies were developed for a real-world setting, capacity and adoption were increased, systematic evaluations were incorporated, and sustained funding was obtained. In the full-implementation phase (2014-2019), all Dutch Healthcare Insurers reimbursed the TOP program, enabling VPT infants to participate in the program without charge. By 2018, the number of interventionists that provided the TOP program had increased from 37 to 91, and all level III hospitals and 65% of regional hospitals in the Netherlands referred VPT infants. Currently, the program reaches 70% of the Dutch target population and parental satisfaction with the TOP program is high. After a 12-year implementation period, the TOP program forms part of routine care in the Netherlands.

Un previo ensayo controlado al azar ha sugerido la eficacia de un programa holandés sobre la crianza sensible para infantes muy prematuros (VPT) posterior al momento en que se les dio de alta, indicando que la implementación a lo largo de toda la nación era justificada. Este artículo describe el desarrollo y la implementación a nivel de toda la nación de la intervención, conocida como el programa ToP, el cual consistía de tres fases. En la fase de preparación (2006-2010), se desarrollaron una teoría de cambio y la estructura del programa ToP, y se obtuvieron los fondos para la fase dos, con base en un Caso de Negocios (BC) positivo. En la fase piloto de implementación (2010-2014), se desarrollaron estrategias de intervención para un escenario del mundo real, se aumentaron la capacidad y la adopción, se incorporaron evaluaciones sistemáticas y se obtuvieron fondos para mantener el programa. En la fase de implementación completa (2014-2019), todas las Aseguradoras Holandesas del Sector Salud reembolsaron el costo del programa ToP, permitiéndoles a los infantes VPT participar en el programa sin costo alguno. Para 2018, el número de practicantes de la intervención que prestaban el servicio del programa ToP había aumentado de 37 a 91, y todos los hospitales del nivel III y 65% de los hospitales regionales en Holanda refirieron los infantes VPT al programa. Actualmente, el programa llega a 70% de la población holandesa para la cual está destinado y la satisfacción de los padres con el programa ToP es alta. Después de un período de implementación de 12 años, el programa ToP forma parte del cuidado de salud rutinario en Holanda.

Un essai contrôlé randomisé précédent a suggéré l'efficacité d'un programme hollandais de sensibilité de parentage après la sortie de l'hôpital pour les nourrissons grands prématurés (GP ici en français), indiquant qu'une mise en œuvre au niveau national était justifiée. Cet article décrit le développement et la mise en œuvre au niveau national de l'intervention, connue en tant que ToP program, qui a consisté en trois phases. Dans la phase de préparation (2006-2010), une théorie du changement et la structure du programme ToP a été développée, et le financement pour la phase deux, basée sur une Etude de Cas positive, a été sécurisé. Dans la phase pilote d'implémentation (2010-2014) des stratégies d'intervention ont été développées pour un contexte réel, la capacité et l'adoption ont été augmentées, les évaluations systématiques ont été incorporées, et un financement durable a été sécurisé. Dans la pleine phase de mise en œuvre (2014-1029), tous les Assurances Santé Hollandaises ont remboursé le programme ToP, permettant aux nourrissons GP de participer au programme sans coût. En 2018 le nombre de prestataires qui offraient le programme ToP a augmenté de 37 à 91, et tous les hôpitaux de niveau III ainsi que 65% des hôpitaux régionaux aux Pays Bas ont envoyé les nourrissons GP au programme. En ce moment le programme atteint 70% de la population cible hollandaise et la satisfaction parentale avec le programme ToP est élevée. Après une période de mise en œuvre de 12 ans le programme ToP fait partie des soins de routine aux Pays Bas.

Rethinking preventive post-discharge intervention programmes for very preterm infants and their parents.

Post-discharge preventive intervention programmes with involvement of the parent may support the resilience and developmental outcomes of infants born very preterm. Randomized controlled trials of home-based family-centred intervention programmes in very preterm infants that aimed to improve cognitive outcome, at least at age two, were selected and updated on the basis of a recent systematic review to compare their content and effect over time to form the basis of a narrative review. Six programmes were included in this narrative review. Four of the six programmes led to improved child cognitive and/or motor development. Two programmes, which focused primarily on responsive parenting and development, demonstrated improved cognitive outcome up till 5 years after completion of the programme. The programmes that also focused on maternal anxiety remediation led to improved maternal mental well-being, along with improved child behaviour, in one study - even at 3 years after completion of the programme. The magnitude of the effects was modest. Family-centred preventive intervention programmes that aim at improvement of child development should be continued after discharge home to improve the preterm child's resilience. Programmes may be most effective when they support the evolvement of a responsive parent-infant relationship over time, as well as the parent's well-being.

Maternal attachment representations after very preterm birth and the effect of early intervention.

OBJECTIVE: For very preterm infants the mother-infant relationship may be compromised. Maternal attachment representations 18 (corrected) months after very preterm birth and the effect of the post-discharge Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program (IBAIP) were studied. The IBAIP is designed to assist parents to support and enhance their infant's regulatory competence and development. The intervention consisted of 6-8 home visits during the first 8 months after birth. METHOD: Seventy-eight mothers of very preterm infants (< 32 weeks and/or < 1500 g) were interviewed, who participated in a randomized controlled trial: 41 from the intervention group and 37 from the control group. Maternal attachment representations were assessed with the Working Model of the Child Interview (WMCI). The interviews resulted in a classification of the attachment representations into balanced or non-balanced. RESULTS: 30% of the mothers had non-balanced attachment representations. Qualitative content analysis of the answers showed that negative feelings when first seeing their baby and negative or ambivalent feelings in the first weeks at home with their baby are related to non-balanced attachment representations. The WMCI revealed no differences between the intervention and control group. CONCLUSION: Early support for mothers of very preterm born infants to develop a healthy mother-infant relationship is recommended especially for mothers who report negative first experiences.

The effect of the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program on mother-infant interaction after very preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: Prematurity and perinatal insults lead to increased developmental vulnerability. The home-based Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program (IBAIP) was designed to improve development of preterm infants. In a multicenter randomized controlled trial the effect of IBAIP on mother-infant interaction was studied as a secondary outcome. METHOD: Mother-infant interaction was assessed during the Still-face procedure at 6 months corrected age. One hundred and twelve mother-infant dyads (57 intervention, 55 control) were studied. RESULTS: Findings partially supported our hypothesis that the intervention would increase maternal sensitivity in interaction with their preterm infants. No effects were found on infant self-regulatory behavior or positive interaction behavior. CONCLUSION: The family-centered and strength-based approach of IBAIP appears to be a promising intervention method to promote sensitive mother-infant interaction at home after discharge from hospital. However, no positive effects were found on infant interaction behavior.

A neurobehavioral intervention and assessment program in very low birth weight infants: outcome at 24 months.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program (IBAIP) improves development and behavior in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants at 24-month corrected age. STUDY DESIGN: In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial 86 infants received postdischarge intervention until 6-month corrected age. The intervention consisted of supporting infants' self-regulation and development, and facilitating sensitive parent-infant interactions; 90 control infants received regular care. At 6 months, positive intervention effects were found. At 24 months, development and behavior were evaluated with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) and the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL). RESULTS: Eighty-three intervention and 78 control infants were available for follow-up. After adjustment for differences in perinatal characteristics, an intervention effect of 6.4 points (+/- standard error, 2.4) on the Psychomotor Developmental Index favored the intervention infants. Groups did not differ on the Mental Developmental Index, the Behavioral Rating Scale of the BSID-II, or on the CBCL. Subgroup analyses revealed improved motor as well as improved mental outcomes in intervention infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and with combined biological and social risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The IBAIP shows sustained motor improvement in VLBW infants until 2-year corrected age.

The Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program for very low birth weight infants at 6 months corrected age.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program (IBAIP), designed to support and enhance infants' self-regulatory competence, improved developmental and neurobehavioral outcomes in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN: We randomized 86 infants to 1 intervention before discharge and to 6 to 8 home interventions until 6 months corrected age, and 90 control infants received standard care. Developmental and behavioral outcomes were evaluated at 6 months corrected age with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II). Neurobehavioral functioning was evaluated with the Infant Behavioral Assessment (IBA) at baseline and at 6 months corrected age. RESULTS: Despite randomization, some differences in neonatal characteristics were found between the intervention and control infants. After adjustment, intervention effects of 7.2 points (+/- standard error 3.1) on the Mental Developmental Index and 6.4 +/- 2.4 points on the Psychomotor Developmental Index favored the intervention infants. The Behavioral Rating Scale of the BSID-II (P = .000) and the IBA (more approach [P = .003] and less stress [P = .001] over time) also favored the intervention infants. CONCLUSIONS: The IBAIP improved the mental, motor, and behavioral outcomes of VLBW infants at 6 months corrected age.

The reproducibility and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in parents of children with disabilities.

OBJECTIVE: To study the reproducibility (inter-rater agreement), the construct and criterion validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in the parents of children with disabilities. DESIGN: The COPM was administered twice by two different occupational therapists. The inter-rater agreement of the content of the prioritized problems was explored. Data analysis of the reproducibility of the scores was based on the Bland and Altman method. Measures used: The construct validity was studied by comparing the results of the COPM with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, and a quality of life questionnaire. The criterion validity was verified with an open-ended question. SETTING: Occupational therapy departments of a university hospital and three rehabilitation institutes. SUBJECTS: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive parents of children referred for occupational therapy. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 80 children with a mean age of 3.7 years (range 1-7.5). Of the prioritized problems identified in the first interview, 80% were also prioritized in the second interview. The limits of agreement were - 2.4 to +2.3 for the mean performance score and - 2.3 to + 2.6 for the mean satisfaction score. Assumptions about the construct and criterion validity were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The inter-rater agreement of the prioritized problems is good enough for client-centred occupational therapy. The reproducibility of the performance and satisfaction scores is moderate. The results support the construct and criterion validity. The COPM identifies many child-unique problems that are not assessed with existing standardized measurement instruments or with a simple open-ended question.

The Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program to support preterm infants after hospital discharge: a pilot study.

In this pilot study we investigated the feasibility of The Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program (IBAIP) in a group of preterm infants. At the age of 6 months, the neurobehavioural organization and self-regulatory competence of an intervention group was compared with a control group who had received the standard follow-up care. The intervention group consisted of 13 males and seven females (mean gestational age [GA] 29.2 weeks, SD 1.3wks; mean birthweight 1232g, SD 320g). The control group consisted of 11 males and nine females (mean GA 29wks, SD 1.6wks; mean birthweight 1198g, SD 397g). Inclusion criteria were: a GA of 32 weeks and family residence in the district of Amsterdam. Exclusion criteria were: severe congenital abnormalities, intraventricular haemorrhage grade III or IV, periventricular leukomalacia grade III or IV, and infants whose mothers had a history of illicit drug use. The intervention infants received 6 to 8 IBAIP interventions at home, from discharge until 6 months of age. The Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale was administered at term; the Infant Behavioral Assessment (IBA) at term, 3, and 6 months of age; and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II at 3 and 6 months (corrected age). At 6 months, intervention infants showed less stress and more approach behaviours on the IBA compared with control infants. These promising results warrant further evaluation in a randomized controlled trial.