Prostate cancer diagnosed in spinal cord-injured patients is more commonly advanced stage than in able-bodied patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and characteristics of prostate cancer in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Little is known about the characteristics of prostate cancer in men with SCI, because prostate cancer screening is not aggressively performed in this population. METHODS: In one fiscal year, 648 men with SCI older than age 50 years were actively enrolled with the SCI service, 20,949 able-bodied men older than age 50 years were actively enrolled in the outpatient clinic database, and 945 patients with prostate cancer were in the cancer registry at our facility. These three databases were cross-referenced for prostate cancer diagnosis and stage and compared with the presence of SCI. RESULTS: Of the 648 patients with SCI, 12 patients with a prostate cancer diagnosis that preceded their injury were excluded. Of the remaining 636 patients, 11 (1.7%) had been diagnosed with prostate cancer since their injury. In contrast, of the 20,949 able-bodied men older than age 50 years seen at our facility in fiscal year 1999, 919 (4.4%) had prostate cancer. Of the patients with SCI and prostate cancer, 7 (63.6%) had locally advanced (Stage T3) or metastatic prostate cancer compared with 267 (29.1%) in the able-bodied population (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Although the proportion of patients with a prostate cancer diagnosis was greater in the able-bodied patients, the prostate cancer detected in the patients with SCI tended to be of a more advanced stage and grade. The difference was likely a result of the decreased use of prostate cancer screening in this population.

Which stoma works better for colonic dysmotility in the spinal cord injured patient?

BACKGROUND: The formation of an intestinal stoma is very effective in the treatment of colonic dysmotility associated with spinal cord injury (SCI). Little is known about the difference in the long-term outcome among left-sided colostomies, right-sided colostomies, and ileostomies in this patient population. METHODS: The records of 45 SCI patients with intestinal stomas at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Operative details and preoperative colonic transit times (CTT) were recorded. Patients who were alive and available were interviewed using a questionnaire designed to assess the quality of life (QOL), health status, and time to bowel care before and after stoma formation. RESULTS: Between 1976 and 2002, 45 patients underwent a total of 48 intestinal stomas. A left-sided colostomy (LC) was formed in 21 patients, right-sided colostomy (RC) in 20, and ileostomy (IL) in 7. Three of the patients in the RC group ultimately underwent total abdominal colectomy and ileostomy. The indications for stoma formation and CTT were different in the three groups. Bloating, constipation, chronic abdominal pain, difficulty evacuation with prolonged CTT was the main indication in 95% of patients in the RC group, 43% of patients in the LC group, and 29% in the IL group. Management of complicated decubitus ulcers, perineal and pelvic wounds was the primary indication in 43% of patients in the LC group, 5% in the RC group, and none in the IL group. Preoperative total and right CTTs were longer in the RC group compared with the LC group: 127.5 versus 83.1 hours (P <0.05) and 53.7 versus 28.5 hours (P <0.05), respectively. Eighty-two percent of patients (37 of 45) were interviewed at a mean follow-up of 5.5 years after stoma formation. Most patients who were interviewed were satisfied with their stoma (RC, 88%; LC, 100%; IL, 83%) and the majority would have preferred to have the stoma earlier (RC, 63%; LC, 77%; and IL, 63%). The QOL index significantly improved in all groups (RC, 49 to 79, P <0.05; LC, 50 to 86, P <0.05; and IL, 60 to 82, P <0.05), as well as the health status index (RC, 58 to 83, P <0.05; LC, 63 to 92, P <0.05; IL, 61 to 88, P <0.05). The average daily time to bowel care was significantly shortened in all groups (RC, 102 to 11 minutes, P <0.05; LC, 123 to 18 minutes, P <0.05; and IL, 73 to 13 minutes, P <0.05.). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the type of stoma, most patients had functional improvement postoperatively. Patients who underwent RC had longer CTT and more chronic symptoms related to colonic dysmotility, reflecting the preoperative selection bias. The successful outcome noted in all groups suggests that preoperative symptoms and CTT studies may have been helpful in optimal choice of stoma site selection.