Inhaled biopharmaceutical drug development: nonclinical considerations and case studies.

Biopharmaceuticals are complex molecules often manufactured from living systems and their specificity and novelty holds great promise for the treatment of chronic diseases for which there are currently no cures. The inhalation route of biopharmaceutical drug delivery is attractive because the large surface area of the lung, and close proximity of the alveolar and vascular systems, maximizes the potential for drug delivery to the lung and/or systemic circulation. In addition, costs of delivery to the patient are potentially much reduced, in comparison with parental administration, since inhalation is non-invasive and likely to promote patient compliance. However, in comparison with small molecule drug development, developing an inhaled biopharmaceutical that is effective and safe for human use is associated with many challenges. This review considers some general principles of drug delivery to lung and issues associated with the translation of proof of concept studies to toxicology safety studies (e.g. aerosol generation, species selection, exaggerated pharmacology, and immunogenicity). This review also presents a summary of nonclinical and clinical data from inhaled biopharmaceuticals which are either marketed for human use or in Phase II clinical trials (e.g. DNase, insulin, human growth hormone, vaccines, therapeutic plasmid DNA complexes).

Challenges in inhaled product development and opportunities for open innovation.

Dosimetry, safety and the efficacy of drugs in the lungs are critical factors in the development of inhaled medicines. This article considers the challenges in each of these areas with reference to current industry practices for developing inhaled products, and suggests collaborative scientific approaches to address these challenges. The portfolio of molecules requiring delivery by inhalation has expanded rapidly to include novel drugs for lung disease, combination therapies, biopharmaceuticals and candidates for systemic delivery via the lung. For these drugs to be developed as inhaled medicines, a better understanding of their fate in the lungs and how this might be modified is required. Harmonized approaches based on 'best practice' are advocated for dosimetry and safety studies; this would provide coherent data to help product developers and regulatory agencies differentiate new inhaled drug products. To date, there are limited reports describing full temporal relationships between pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) measurements. A better understanding of pulmonary PK and PK/PD relationships would help mitigate the risk of not engaging successfully or persistently with the drug target as well as identifying the potential for drug accumulation in the lung or excessive systemic exposure. Recommendations are made for (i) better industry-academia-regulatory co-operation, (ii) sharing of pre-competitive data, and (iii) open innovation through collaborative research in key topics such as lung deposition, drug solubility and dissolution in lung fluid, adaptive responses in safety studies, biomarker development and validation, the role of transporters in pulmonary drug disposition, target localisation within the lung and the determinants of local efficacy following inhaled drug administration.